"Want to become one of the top 100 most influential or powerful people in the world ... then launch and develop a popular, well used and well liked website that becomes one of the top 100 used websites in the world ,,, just like people such as Jimmy Wales who founded Wikipedia, who is reported to be in the top 100 most influential people on Planet Earth ...  not forgetting Mark Zuckerberg, who founded FaceBook who is one of those near the top of the list .... Walter Davis of INL News

SCIENTOLOGY & THE CIA
FEBRUARY 27, 2016 MARK HACKARD 

https://espionagehistoryarchive.com/2016/02/27/scientology-the-cia/  

Also see:

http://www.awn.bz/Scientology_createdbyMI6.html


http://www.awn.bz/Ron_Hubbard_GroomedByMI6.html


http://www.awn.bz/Scientology_MI6_RootsP1.html


http://www.awn.bz/Ron_Hubbard_MI6_Agent_P2.html


This presentation was read by Aleksandr Leonidovich Dvorkin, president of the Irinaeus of Lyons Center for Religious Research Studies, on January 26th, 2016, at a conference run by the Orthodox St. Tikhon University for the Humanities. (Translator’s note: While we wouldn’t claim that the Church of Scientology is an integral element of the US Intelligence Community, Dvorkin’s lecture is an excellent expose of the nexus between the Western power structure, its intelligence apparatus and dangerous cults).

The topic of Scientology’s connection to the CIA became commonplace long ago. It’s mentioned in a mass of articles, interviews, and television programs. But when I referred to this in passing during a conversation with one journalist several months ago, he took interest: do I have irrefutable evidence of or clues to this connection? Could I, so to say, point to a “smoking gun?”

The question interested me, and I decided to try and collect materials on this topic. So can we bring irrefutable evidence?

It’s understandable that if I could point to a “smoking gun,” my name would be Edward Snowden, and I would be hunted by US intelligence services, who (like any intelligence services) never disclose the names of organizations that cooperate with them, and for obvious reasons. However, open information on when the US government began to openly and publicly lobby the interests of Scientology (this occurred in 1993) could compose an entire arsenal of smoking guns. It knew full well about the cult’s activity in legally and illegally collecting information on various people and organizations.

From documents published today, we know that already in 1957 the CIA began investigating the activities of L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology. But the collated data that was the result of the investigation has still not been published up to this time. I don’t think we should expect the publication of these materials in the near future.

All his life, Hubbard himself was quite actively and constantly fascinated with two things: occultism and intelligence activities. For example, as a still wholly young man he entered the Rosicrucian order, undertook occult seances, and experienced certain otherworldly meetings.

Already as head of the Scientology cult, with pride he called Aleister Crowley, the most famous Satanist of the twentieth century, his “very good friend.” We can bring a multitude of other facts, but that wouldn’t fit into the parameters of the current presentation. I’ll remind you that John Atack’s excellent article “Hubbard and Occultism” was published in my Russian translation. [1]

Scientology’s official biography of the cult’s founder furiously denies Hubbard’s ties to occultism, but then it exaggerates his special relationship with the intelligence services on a cosmic scale. And so with pride the Scientologists inform us that during the war Hubbard worked in the US Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), where he heroically proved himself in “catching foreign spies and rendering aid to US forces surrounded by the enemy on the island of Bataan.” As a matter of fact, we know that while working in ONI, Hubbard was just a rank-and-file clerk in the mail department, where he mainly censored the correspondence of servicemen – there’s certainly nothing heroic in that. Not once during the entire war did he take part in combat action.

Scientologists also invented the legend justifying Hubbard’s postwar time in the Pasadena lodge of the Satanic Ordo Templi Orientis (the “Order of the Eastern Temple” headed by Crowley) and his fascination with sex magic rituals, which he conducted together with lodge head Jack Parsons. According to the cult’s legend, Hubbard, you see, was sent into the Satanic cult by a certain intelligence agency as a mole and destroyed it from within. There is no need to speak about this version not withstanding factual criticism.

Hubbard’s enthusiasm for occultism also left its mark in the symbols of Scientology he and his followers developed.

Here, for example, is a Scientology flyer published during Hubbard’s life, called

“The Golden Dawn” (so was called the occult lodge whence came Aleister Crowley).

Here is a contemporary audio and video publication of Hubbard’s works, also called “The Golden Dawn.”


And here’s what a speech by the current head of Scientology, David Miscavige, looks like. The occult symbology of a previously thought-out stage interior doesn’t need any clarification. Temple columns, the theme of “Golden Dawn and the Moon” (an extremely widespread occult symbol) over the “high priest.”

Here is the Scientology cross well-known to all, borrowed from the deck of Tarot cards developed by Crowley. I’ll remind you that this is in fact a crossed-out cross. Also pay attention to another detail: the eight-pointed star, on which is set the image of the cross. We’ll come back to it again.

[Scientology Aleister Crowley Tarot Card] The rose-and-cross Tarot card developed by Satanist Aleister Crowley. Note the likeness with the Scientology cross.

Now we will note that there is something in common between Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard and the US Intelligence Community – a passion for occultism.

For a start, here are a few facts:

In 1989 in London former CIA officer Miles Copeland’s memoirs, The Game Player, were released, in which he told of a scheme set into action during the early-mid 1950s by his colleague Bob Mandelstam. The scheme was called “Occultism in High Places.” Its idea was simple: since some leaders and heads of governments had the habit of consulting with astrologers and other occult advisors, American intelligence officers were to “work with” these occultists and make them conduits of their agency’s influence.

This scheme worked, for example, when a “clairvoyant” sent by the agents convinced Ghana’s President Kwame Nkrumah to make a visit to China, during which a coup inspired by the CIA overthrew the absent leader. In Copeland’s words, the US intelligence community influenced Indonesian President Sukarno “quite solidly” through occult “seers” and “fortune tellers.”

Mandelstam also used the spiritual-political movement “Moral Rearmament,” which, according to Copeland, gave agents the opportunity to influence not only African and Asian political figures through secret channels, but also European leaders. It is there that Copeland also mentions a special agreement, which, in his words, the CIA concluded with Scientology, although he is silent about what was contained therein. Inasmuch as I was able to find out, no one aside from the chatty Copeland mentions this agreement (clearly established in the 1960’s) in open sources.

Copeland tells of another interesting case:

We sent into the Scientology cult our agent, who under the direction of Ron Hubbard himself became “clear,” but then he demanded and started to receive ever more “monetary compensation for operational expenditures,” which together with his savings he gave over to Dianetics.

So we will hardly find out who was ultimately manipulating whom: the CIA Scientology, or Scientology the CIA.

In the same way the work of US intelligence officers with a variety of occultists hasn’t gone unnoticed: we can presume that influence disseminated to both sides, and someone among the intelligence officers began practicing occultism. The set of images used by the secret services gives certain bases for making such presumptions concrete.

We see the same eight-pointed star, just like the one placed on the Scientology cross. Let’s return to the image of the Scientology cross. Its crossing out can also be viewed as the union of four daggers. And so the daggers cross out the symbol of Christianity. But the dagger is a famous symbol of intelligence, and precisely the star of the Intelligence Community is composed of them.

In the center of the Intelligence Community’s star is a rose with five petals. But this – the five-petaled rose – is the symbol of the Rosicrucian order. Is that a coincidence? Hardly: after all, even the image of the sharp leaflets between the petals is repeated.

And then there’s the most interesting thing: we’ll read the description of the seal that is found on the official site of the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The eight points of the polar star symbolize the six departments and two independent agencies of the Intelligence Community. They are combined with the 15 stars around the circumference [sic] represent the elements of other agencies that are also part of the Intelligence Community [3].

The problem is that there aren’t 15 stars. There are 16. Count them yourself. So what then is the unnamed sixteenth organization, an element of which is part of the US Intelligence Community? Can we build suppositions?

Now we will finally bring some circumstantial evidence that can easily be found in open sources.

At the beginning of the 1990’s, the Greek police executed raids in the Athens Scientology office and confiscated a multitude of the cult’s internal documents, a part of which were published. In some of them are contained references to assistance that the CIA rendered to Scientology’s foreign branches.

[Scientology Greece Document] Scientology internal document on CIA cooperation, confiscated by Greek police.

Already in 2001 in the magazine Le Monde Diplomatique was published an article by the famous journalist Bruno Fuscero “Cults: a US Trojan Horse for Europe” [4], in which he quite reasonably wrote on the use of a whole set of cults, including Scientology, by US intelligence and diplomacy. Despite the sensational character of the article, no lawsuits followed after it.

Hardly anyone can deny that the US State Department lobbies the interests of Scientology in various countries: France; Germany; Italy; Greece; Russia; Hungary, etc. Even among the published Wikileaks documents, a report slipped by that after US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright’s arrival in Germany, German Scientologists were invited to the US Embassy for a briefing. Inasmuch as I know, no other cult enjoys such attention and such privileges from the United States government. I also understand that nothing is given for free in this world. So what can Scientology offer the US government that the latter would so actively lobby the interests of a comparatively not large cult with far from the most spotless reputation, and whose secret doctrine the whole world laughs at?

One of Scientology’s main objectives is the collection and storage of a large mass of information, so that with its help it can compromise and establish control over whomever: from a simple member of the cult who has gone astray to the powerful of this world, control of whom would give unlimited possibilities. 25 years ago the former head of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office said that Scientology “has one of the most effective intelligence services, which can even compete with the FBI.” From that time the cult’s capital has increased several times over, if not exponentially. It can afford to hire many more lawyers and private detectives, which significantly raises the cult’s potential for carrying out complex special operations.

Now a little history. In 1993, after a 25-year war it waged against Scientology, the US Internal Revenue Service de factosurrendered: having conducted secret negotiations with cult head David Miscavige, it signed an agreement with the group, according to which it recognized Scientology and all related organizations a religion and totally freed them from taxes. Namely after this agreement the State Department began to lobby Scientology’s interests in all the world’s countries. Moreover, a secret protocol was attached to the agreement (a new one, not the one mentioned by Copeland), and it hasn’t been published to this day. What could the content be?

Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk (who many years ago, as director of Aval Bank in Kiev, possibly underwent several Scientology courses) is an example of a man about whom personal information would be extremely interesting not only to Scientology, but also to the US Intelligence Community. I think that we could continue a list of people occupying high posts in various countries, people who are of interest to US intelligence, for a sufficiently long time. And if Scientology has such information and is ready to share it, then why wouldn’t an intelligence service use such an opportunity?

Yet in what way can the cult obtain such data? Scientology’s information collection is generated through several methods.

The first of them is auditing, presented by the cult as a kind of confession. But during this “confession,” everything that a person – in a state of light hypnotic trance – might report over a three-to-four hour session is picked up on audio and video and kept forever (I’ll remind you that this is conducted with the help of the so-called “E-Meter,” i.e. a primitive lie detector). Those who conduct the auditing are not obliged to keep the secrets of this “confession.” Rather, they collect the most intimate information about a person in order to turn him into an obedient slave. Let’s recall that during a raid of the Taganskaya Scientology “Ideal Org” by Moscow law enforcement, spy equipment for audio and video recording was found built into the walls of the auditing room. By the standards of the cult, such equipment should be present in all auditing facilities.

The second method is the “targeted” collection of information on a person who interests the cult. Specialists are hired for this, and specially instructed cult members help them. Either compromising materials are found, or they are fabricated. Among those who interest the cult could be famous personalities; figures in show business; law enforcement; officers of the security services; political figures; and of course, enemies of the cult.

We can and must emphasize that both methods of collecting and using information are flagrantly amoral. The cult uses the obtained data for self-advancement and self-expansion. I wonder, has it ever crossed the minds of American intelligence officers that receiving such information from the cult and using it is deeply amoral? Scientologists themselves think that the opportunity to control people in such a way serves a higher goal that brings the cult’s victory closer, meaning the victory of “good” in all the world. But if US intelligence, in no way believing in Scientology’s good and progressivism, finds it necessary and permissible to use this information, then we need to honestly admit that it considers getting information acquired by a quite dubious organization through deceit, bribery, theft, torture, and confidential confessions normal.

Finally, even if we believe that Scientology has absolutely no ties with any of the agencies of the US Intelligence Community, it could still absolutely and unmistakably be called a foreign intelligence organization active in the Russian Federation. And this intelligence organization sends personal and deeply confidential data on Russian citizens to its headquarters in the United States. That means we must approach such an organization in corresponding fashion.

But of course, it seems to me that we can claim with an enormous degree of confidence that Scientology has a multitude of connections with the US Intelligence Community. The evidence I’ve brought forth in this presentation, quite weighty if circumstantial, indicates precisely that. Almost two years ago, US President Barack Obama publicly announced that international religious freedom (read: its American version) is a vital factor of US national security [5]. I this that this announcement, striking in its cynical frankness, just admitted what had been an obvious fact for years. And we can probably suppose which organization hides behind the unnamed sixteenth star on the US Intelligence Community’s coat of arms.


P.S. Thank you to my friend Gerry Armstrong for help in gathering materials for this article. 

[1] http://iriney.ru/knigi/kapkan-bezgranichnoj-svobodyi.-sbornik-statej-o-sajentologii,-dianetike-i-l.-r.-xabbarde/xabbard-i-okkultizm.html

[2] Miles Copeland. Confessions of the CIA Original Political Operative, London, 1989.

[3] http://www.dni.gov/index.php/intelligence-community/seal

[4] Русский перевод см. тут: http://www.entheta.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2780. Мой сокращенный перевод: http://iriney.ru/sektyi-i-kultyi/sektovedenie/novosti-sektovedeniya/evropa-soprotivlyaetsya-amerikanskim-religioznyim-sektam.html

[5] http://www.voanews.com/content/president-obama-religious-freedom-matters-to-national-security/1845717.html


Translated by Mark Hackard.

In 1937, Aldous Huxley moved to Hollywood. He earned a substantial income as a Hollywood screenwriter. 52
Aldous Huxley says he was friends with Ron Hubbard. That friendship obviously began in Hollywood in 1937, when both writers were serving under William Wiseman in Hollywood. Huxley and Hubbard were MI 6 agents.
Huxley had written a book promoting World Government. Later in time, Huxley headed a covert operation to subvert America’s youth with hallucinogenic drugs. When Huxley wrote a book promoting hallucinogenic drugs, Hubbard recommended that Scientologists should read it.

Frank Olson, American bacteriologist
Frank Rudolph Olson was an American bacteriologist, biological warfare scientist, and Central Intelligence Agency employee who worked at Camp Detrick in Maryland

Death by Medicine a film by Gary Null    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwCUDCQMLwY 
The Progressive Radio Network  Published on Oct 23, 2015
Death By Medicine takes a hard examination at the dominant medical paradigm contributing to America’s health crisis. Based on Gary Null’s ground breaking book on the hundreds of thousands of injuries and deaths caused by conventional medicine, the documentary looks at the medical industrial complex, the pharmaceutical industry’s usurpation of the nation’s medical schools, research, falsified drug clinical trials, peer reviewed scientific journals, and the complicity of federal health agencies to permit this to happen. The result is a medical system unfounded on sound science. Why is there a lack of oversight by government regulatory agencies and private interest lobbyists call the shots for national healthcare? From FDA and FBI raids on cherry and dairy farmers to the halls of Congress, we witness the hostile attack on the natural health industry. We witness what happens when a mercenary healthcare system and the failures of a just and fair healthcare policy leaves the US as the 37th healthcare system in the world. The result is the American medical system is broken and corrupted by money rather than scientific fact, and the answer is to create a new medical paradigm that addresses the health of people rather than raising of stock prices, careers and reputations. Don't let anyone fool you, so tune on http://prn.fm/ Run Time 1 Hr 33 Min Written and Directed by Gary Null Co-Directed by Valerie Van Cleve Produced by Valerie Van Cleve, Richard Gale Associate Producer Rachael Spratt Editor Bill DesJardins, Richie Williamson 3-D Graphics Corey Hanson, Donald Pearsall

United States Ship Ulysses S. Grant

 Shelly Miscavige - Wife of Scientology Head David  Miscavige 

Shelly Miscavige and her husband David Shelly Miscavige who is the head of Scientology

Vincent Astor and Franklin Roosevelt

Mr. Biden and Mr. Obama in June 2015 at Beau Biden’s funeral. The president delivered the eulogy.CreditDoug Mills/The New York Time

India could be at the heart of future global growth by forging economic links with Indian Ocean rim countries
https://thetypicalindian.org/news/india-could-be-at-the-heart-of-future-global-growth-by-forging-economic-links-with-indian-ocean-rim-countries​
For arena addresses and all his many foreign visits, Narendra Modi still lacks a defining international economic project
ytima   May 2017


For arena addresses and all his many foreign visits, Narendra Modi still lacks a defining international economic project

Read more:  Create News | The Typical Indian™ 
http://thetypicalindian.com#ixzz4MybgsHXt

Follow us: 
@typical_tti on Twitter
 thetypicali on Facebook


The recent strike in Uri scuppered one candidate, specifically shoving against greater economic integration across South Asia. But it has brought the Indian Ocean: another into view, and the thought of putting the broader region at the heart of a new neighborhood policy for India itself.
September’s terrorist attack has created an existential catastrophe for the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc), pushing the eight-nation body to cancel its meeting next month in Islamabad. Saarc is commonly viewed as ineffectual. Many observers are now asking whether its position is now untenable. Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe questioned whether the group could endure, musing that it should be replaced by a body focused on the Indian Ocean earlier this month.
This chimes with notions about India’s neighborhood floated by allies of Modi. The India Foundation, a think tank with links to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, and both ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, held an Indian Ocean summit in Singapore last month which aimed to increase India’s profile as a power with interests across Asia.
Parts of the event’s program had a gentler focus—on ethnic ties based on Hinduism and Buddhism. But there was a harder edge too, with India placed as a counterweight. International Secretary S. Jaishankar argued in favor of “reviving the Indian Ocean as a geopolitical notion,” in a speech that seemed designed to lay down a mark against Chinese encroachment in the Bay of Bengal.
Modi has also talked up the importance of the “Indian Ocean region,” seeing with a quartet of East African countries before this season, alongside excursions to Mauritius, the Seychelles, and Sri Lanka. But these Indian Ocean aspirations risk being diverted vague geopolitical worries about China, and by narrow ethnic dilemmas on the one hand on another. Instead, India should be focused squarely on the potential economic gains from regional trade that was greater.

Here the chance is large, in theory at least.

But in the east or southern Africa ’s six fastest growing economies over that same period, four may also be of the world, including Kenya and Tanzania. A host of other nations likely to grow comparably fast, not least Indonesia and Myanmar, are part of the wider region also.

With African marketplaces being targeted by groups like Tata and Mahindra this potential growth is attracting corporate India. If Modi’s Make In India export drive will be to succeed, goods produced in domestic factories must seek buyers around eastern Africa and South-East Asia.
The difficulty is that while these countries are set to grow individually, the connections between them are often lame. South Asia is certainly one of the world’s least integrated areas. But the Indian Ocean, which stretches to East Africa and encompasses about 40 nations, is barely any better connected. Estimates indicate a third of global bulk cargo and two-thirds of oil shipments cross the Indian Ocean.
How might India improve this scenario? The idea of creating a new regional body, or expanding an old one, is one approach being discussed. In his speech, Jaishankar floated the idea of enlarging the Indian Ocean Rim Association, a low-profile group of 21 nations. It has clear drawbacks, although this is better than nothing. If Saarc’s flaw is that it’s ruled excessively by India, an expanded Indian Ocean newsgroup will endure the opposite problem, bringing together a group that is diffuse with little in common.
The record of previous attempts to shove on alternative regional bodies can also be hardly encouraging, not least the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation, whose six other participants Modi has invited to meet alongside this week’s Brics summit in Goa. Meanwhile, there's little evidence that regional bodies do much to enhance trade flows.
A better approach would see India making a bigger, unilateral drive to improve regional connectivity, including greater financial support for infrastructure investment that is new, and a brand new drive to reduce trade barriers, beginning with its own.
Grand One Belt, One Road initiative shows that actual projects between states are usually the best foundation for new economic co-operation across areas are ’sed by the success of China. Here, India has work to do, be it driving on projects like the mooted Myanmar-Bangladesh-India gas pipeline, or supplying greater development funding support to poorer neighbors.
This fact alone should warrant much greater emphasis being placed by Modi on it. But if India is to issue at the center of a new regional order, it needs to open its wallet first.


 L. Ron Hubbard] L. Ron Hubbard.  Claims that Ron Hubbard started Scientology as a front for MI6/MI5 and the CIA

Lou Dobbs on the set of his CNN show, “Lou Dobbs Tonight,” in 2005. (Mark Hill/AP)

Free Speech and Shutting Down the Vaccine Debat
Truthstream Media
Please help support us on Patreon, read our goals here: https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia Truthstream Can Be Found Here: Our Film: TheMindsofMen.net Site: http://TruthstreamMedia.com Twitter: @TruthstreamNews Backup Vimeo: Vimeo.com/truthstreammedia DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF

[Aleister Crowley] Aleister Crowley, head of the Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO) and the most well-known Satanist of the twentieth century. Crowley was also a British intelligence asset.

 L. Ron Hubbard who fronted for MI5/MI6/CIA to establish what is now known as the Church of Scientology
Ron Hubbard told Scientologists to support the British New World Order. He advocated the worst sociopaths in the world having direct control over the life of every individual person. MI5/MI6/CIA groomed Hubbard to be the front man for their subjects of Dianetics and Scientology. You can read about that in Scientology Roots Chapter Seven – The First Scientologists and Their Masters.

​The same year that Andrews started the idea of Scientology, the Cecil family took up the idea. In 1871, Arthur Balfour and his in-laws form a private group to study paranormal phenomena. Psychiatrist Josef Breuer was treating Bertha Pappenheim in the summer of 1880.
He found that when she recalled a series of memories back to a traumatic memory, one of her many symptoms would disappear. Breuer drew two important conclusions from his work with Bertha: that her symptoms were the result of thoughts that were buried in her unconscious and that when these thoughts were spoken and became conscious, the symptoms disappeared. Breuer called this catharsis therapy. It was also called abreactive therapy and talking therapy. Catharsis or abreactive therapy – The process of bringing repressed ideas and feelings into consciousness. It is the reliving of past traumatic incidents buried in the subconscious. Sigmund Freud began using this cathartic treatment under Breuer’s guidance. In 1882, Arthur Balfour created the Society for Psychical Research. They conducted scientific research into mental and spiritual phenomena. They developed the subjects of Dianetics and Scientology. All the basic mental, spiritual, and religious ideas in Dianetics and Scientology were developed by the SPR, before L. Ron Hubbard was even born. That includes the therapy used. Sigmund Freud was a member of the Society for Psychical Research. The SPR also conducted extensive research into catharsis therapy. The subjects of Dianetics and Scientology were tied together from the beginning and both subjects were underneath the Cecil family, which means underneath British intelligence. When Ron Hubbard was a teenager he was recruited by British intelligence. Thereafter he executed one intelligence assignment after the other for his entire life.

The Myth of the Unbiased Search Engine
Truthstream Media
Please help support us on Patreon, read our goals here: https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia Truthstream Can Be Found Here: Our Film: TheMindsofMen.net Site: http://TruthstreamMedia.com Twitter: @TruthstreamNews Backup Vimeo: Vimeo.com/truthstreammedia DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX

Lou Dobbs of Fox Business Network speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 2017. (Alex Brandon/AP)

William Wiseman

[Scientology Greece Document] Scientology internal document on CIA cooperation, confiscated by Greek police.

JOHN RAWLINGS REES – TAVISTOCK. John Rawlings Rees was one of the psychiatrists who worked for British intelligence.

Mr. Biden walking to the Rose Garden to announce his decision not to run in the 2016 presidential race.CreditCarlos Barria/Reuters

Theodore Roosevelt Jr

​​​​​Hard-line views made Lou Dobbs a Fox powerhouse. Now he’s shaping Trump’s border policy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/hardline-views-made-lou-dobbs-a-fox-powerhouse-now-hes-shaping-trumps-border-policy/2019/04/26/cb8ebd6c-5fa4-11e9-bfad-36a7eb36cb60_story.html?utm_term=.b66664dcab98

Lou Dobbs and President Trump: A new kind of relationship
Lou Dobbs is an outspoken proponent of border security and cracking down on illegal immigration—and he has a president who listens to him. (Erin Patrick O'Connor/The Washington Post)

By Manuel Roig-Franzia and  Robert Costa   April 27 -    Email Bio Follow

One day in mid-March, President Trump gathered his top economic team at the White House to get its read on the state of the nation’s financial health.
But before the Council of Economic Advisers finished its annual get-together with the nation’s chief executive, a basso profundo voice thundered into the room via speakerphone. With the council sitting by, Trump had placed a call to his unofficial policy whisperer — Lou Dobbs, the Fox Business Network host. The call ushered Dobbs into a traditionally private gathering, shielded from the media and investors eager to get a crystal-ball view of what lies ahead.

The Dobbs-Trump mind meld on display that day is emblematic of a White House where the unusual has become the norm. Day by day, the relationship between the bombastic president and the cranky anchorman has become an object of curiosity and amusement. But it is also something much more profound.
An echo chamber on ideology and policy has evolved; Trump often takes steps urged by Dobbs, such as declaring a national emergency to pay for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border, pushing out Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and pulling back from a proposed cessation of the trade war with China.
Born just nine months apart, the 70-somethings share a penchant for schoolyard-style name-calling, grumbling about enemies seen and unseen, an apocalyptic view of illegal immigration and a deep embrace of hair-color shades not found in the natural world.
Dobbs and Trump, among the most vocal border hawks in recent American history, also both happen to be married to women with recent immigrant heritages. First lady Melania Trump emigrated from Slovenia, and Dobbs’s wife, former CNN sports reporter Debi Lee Segura, is from a family with Mexican American roots.
An echo chamber on ideology and policy has evolved; Trump often takes steps urged by Dobbs, such as declaring a national emergency to pay for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border, pushing out Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and pulling back from a proposed cessation of the trade war with China.
Born just nine months apart, the 70-somethings share a penchant for schoolyard-style name-calling, grumbling about enemies seen and unseen, an apocalyptic view of illegal immigration and a deep embrace of hair-color shades not found in the natural world.
Dobbs and Trump, among the most vocal border hawks in recent American history, also both happen to be married to women with recent immigrant heritages. First lady Melania Trump emigrated from Slovenia, and Dobbs’s wife, former CNN sports reporter Debi Lee Segura, is from a family with Mexican American roots.

 

Trump’s call to Dobbs in March was extraordinary. Four former council chairmen for Trump’s predecessors, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, told The Washington Post the presidents they served under never called a member of the media during their briefings.

“This behavior by President Trump is certainly odd,” said Jason Furman, who chaired the council under Obama from 2013 to 2017.

Harvey S. Rosen, who chaired the council in 2005, said Bush never made such calls either, but added, “the president is entitled to seek advice from whomever he wants and whenever he wants.”

Trump’s council chairman, Kevin Hassett, revealed Trump’s call to Dobbs, without going into detail about what was said, on Dobbs’s show not long afterward. Hassett confirmed in an interview this week with The Washington Post that the president had “a short, friendly call where we shared information with Lou that the president knew he’d be interested in.”

In public, Trump and Dobbs have engaged in a kind of lovefest. In a much-discussed October 2017 interview of Trump, Dobbs gushed, “You have accomplished so much” in his introduction and signed off by adding, “You are, if I may say, everything as advertised as you ran for president.” A left-leaning columnist dubbed the sit-down “a masterpiece of sycophancy.”

Trump, in turn, typically refers to the television host as “The Great Lou Dobbs.” At the New Year’s Eve gala at Mar-a-Lago two months later, the president asked Dobbs to stand and be recognized: “I just wanted to tell you, you are fantastic and we appreciate it,” Trump said.

Trump’s affection for all things Fox is well-established, as demonstrated by his metronomic references to the morning program “Fox & Friends” and his private chats and cheerleading for prime-time Fox News host Sean Hannity. But in Dobbs, Trump also finds a certain special wisdom.

“Lou’s opinion is very important to the president,” said Ed Rollins, the longtime Republican strategist who chairs a Trump super PAC and is a frequent guest on the 7 p.m. Eastern program “Lou Dobbs Tonight.”

[Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen leaving Trump administration amid surge of migrants]

Close associates of both Trump and Dobbs say they speak off-air often — as frequently as every day some weeks. Just this week, Trump tweeted he’d spoken to Dobbs, whose program features a backdrop of an enormous fluttering American flag. The president urged his tens of millions of Twitter followers to watch the Fox Business stalwart’s show that night, which turned out to be the start of a new series with Dobbs alleging “radical Dems, the Deep State and the national left-wing media have tried to subvert and overthrow the presi“While the president and Lou are friendly, it’s not like his relationship with a lot of other people in the media who like him,” said Stephen K. Bannon, Trump’s former White House chief strategist. “This is about policy. They’re completely in sync on immigration and trade and what that all means for wages and how the Republican elite has failed.”

Pesident of the United States.”
Dobbs declined to be interviewed for this story. But Trump was more than happy to talk about Dobbs after being contacted by The Post, calling the veteran anchor’s commentaries about the border “very powerful.”
“Lou has a very strong opinion on the border, and I do listen to that opinion,” Trump said in a phone interview Tuesday evening from the Oval Office.
The president who was once a reality TV star has found in Dobbs something akin to a television avatar, a mutually beneficial embodiment of the presidential id, according to people close to both men.“I think he respects what I’m doing, and I respect the job he does,” Trump said. “He really gets the word out. There’s no question about it.”
A friend of Dobbs, who requested anonymity to speak frankly, said the TV host is well aware his show has become “Trump 2020 TV,” almost an unofficial extension of the president’s reelection campaign.
But Dobbs “doesn’t care,” the friend said. “He’s at the end of his career, and he’s going to do what he wants to do.”

'There was anger'

Dobbs and Trump come from different universes. The president was born into wealth in 1946, the scion of a New York real estate empire. Dobbs, born the year before, speaks of growing up “poor,” with a father who moved the family to Idaho after his Texas business failed.

Dobbs first worked in government anti-poverty programs, then in financial services, before entering the local television business in Arizona and Washington state. There he found his calling, leveraging an authoritative aura, a thunderous voice and a straight-from-Central-Casting anchorman look.
A recruiter lured him to something new launching in 1980 — a 24-hour cable news network named CNN. Dobbs became one of the network’s original stars, eventually taking on multiple roles as an executive, and anchoring the successful program, “Moneyline with Lou Dobbs.”

In 1999, his long tenure imploded spectacularly in a fit of pique when Dobbs ordered his crew to cut away from then-President Bill Clinton’s speech in Colorado after the Columbine school shooting massacre. When CNN executives forced Dobbs to go back to the speech, he peevishly announced on air that “CNN President Rick Kaplan wants us to return to Littleton.”
Within days, Dobbs left CNN to form Space.com. He returned two years later from his ill-fated venture to CNN, where he was given control over his show’s content.
It was during these years Dobbs made a turn, morphing from a straight albeit right-leaning newsman into an anti-illegal immigration firebrand. His show became a nightly drumbeat of border stories, a forum for groups such as the vigilante Minutemen border enDobbs railed about an “invasion of illegal aliens” and broadcast pieces with shaky or misleading factual foundations. He said in 2003 that “illegal aliens” constituted one-third of the total prison population, a claim he later retracted. He promoted claims in 2005 that 7,000 people with leprosy had immigrated here in three years — when, in fact, that number covered 30 years.
Some of Dobbs’s associates theorized he was crassly capitalizing on the market for conservative viewers Fox News had so deftly recognized.

“He has always known where the money was — the voice of the anxious American on immigration,” Soledad O’Brien, a former CNN star whose mother is a black Cuban American, said in an interview.

[Soledad O’Brien on Starbucks and race: “It’s okay to ask and it’s okay to answer”]

Latino journalists at CNN were so alarmed that they demanded a meeting in the early 2000s at headquarters in Atlanta. In the heated session, some correspondents said they did not want to appear on Dobbs’s program. There were also complaints because Dobbs repeatedly used the term “illegal alien,” which many Latinos find offensive, while it was general practice at the network to say “undocumented person.”
“There was anger. There was frustration,” said Rose Arce, then a CNN producer who attended the meeting and is from a Peruvian family. “They felt like they were being used.”
The suits listened to the complaints, but nothing significant changed, attendees said.

“I was horrified,” Maria Hinojosa, a star correspondent who was at the meeting and was the network’s first Latina reporter, said. “It was destroying the credibility of our profession.”
Hinojosa sees far-reaching repercussions from that era.
“He and CNN helped to create the structure, ethos, imagery and tone of where we are now,” Hinojosa said. “He helped to create the narrative that immigrants are bad, that they are lawbreakers and dangerous.”

forcers.

At CNN, Dobbs was generating solid ratings, even as some executives were growing more uncomfortable with his rhetoric. By 2009, tensions were flaring. A top former CNN insider said executives were ill at ease about Dobbs using his radio show on a separate network to focus attention on questions about the discredited theory, known as “birtherism,” that President Obama was not born in the United States.
The end for Dobbs at CNN came around the time the network released a major documentary titled “Latino in America” that showed immigrants in a positive light, and was spearheaded by O’Brien. BastaDobbs, a protest movement using the Spanish words for Stop Dobbs, was spawned around the idea it was hypocritical for CNN to promote O’Brien’s production while also giving such an important forum to Dobbs, who the demonstrators accused of spreading lies and misinformation.
According to the CNN insider, executives were more concerned about reining in Dobbs than the protests. A strategy emerged to neutralize him. Even though Dobbs had control over content, he still had to adhere to CNN standards. So, the network changed its standards, forcing anchors to abide by the same prohibitions on expressing opinions on air that had previously only applied to correspondents.

The same day the new standards were shown to Dobbs, he set in motion negotiations to get him out of his contract, according to the CNN insider.

By November 2009, Dobbs had resigned.

Soledad O’Brien got his old office.

'More Breitbart than Breitbart'

Dobbs may have worn out his welcome at CNN, but there were powerful people who saw greater things ahead. Bannon — the future chief executive of Trump’s 2016 campaign — tried to persuade Dobbs to run for president in 2012.

“He was Trump before Trump,” said Bannon, who ran the right-wing site Breitbart News. “He has always sort of epitomized the intellectual foundation of the Trump movement on trade and immigration, even if he doesn’t get enough attention. He was more Breitbart than Breitbart, going back years.”
Dobbs decided against an Oval Office run. In 2010, he took a job at the Fox Business Network. It was a big step down to an offshoot network from the broader platform of CNN. Yet in the years since, he’s become the most-watched host on business television, a position he’s held since before Trump took office, according to releases by the network, citing Nielsen Media Research, which says he’s also had good ratings with Hispanics.
[Bannon molded Breitbart into a far-right sledgehammer.]
During Dobbs’s early years at Fox Business, Trump didn’t have a close relationship with him. But Dobbs had caught the New York developer’s eye by frequently reporting on birtherism, a topic Trump took up with gusto in 2011 as he began hinting at a run for president.
“Trump echoed those concerns as he began to make inroads with Republican base voters,” said Sam Nunberg, a former Trump aide.
As Trump got more serious about his presidential run, he began absorbing Dobbs’s thoughts on China and immigration.
“He gets it,” Trump told Nunberg.
Once the campaign began, aides and friends noticed Trump often had Dobbs’s show on the screen in the jet they’d nicknamed Trump Force One. It wasn’t unusual for Trump to dial up Dobbs.
“Trump cares about Fox, but he doesn’t care about Fox Business,” Nunberg said. “He cares about Lou Dobbs.”

On his nightly show the month before the election, Dobbs urged Americans to “rouse themselves from a long slumber . . . and vote. Vote for your country or lose it. That’s where we are.”
But on Election Day, it appears one of those who didn’t follow that advice was Dobbs himself. According to records at the Sussex County Board of Elections in New Jersey, where Dobbs lives, the broadcaster did not cast a vote in the 2016 general presidential election. Asked in writing about not voting in that election, as well as the 2008 presidential primary, Dobbs declined to comment through a Fox Business Network spokesperson.

'The Dobbs effect'

Fresh off President Trump’s January 2017 inauguration, his inner circle noticed most televisions in the West Wing of the White House had four channels airing simultaneously: Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, and Bloomberg.
Aides clamored to watch what the big boss was watching, so the White House Communications Agency, which operates those televisions, changed the box reserved for Bloomberg to Fox Business.
“It was the Dobbs effect,” said an official familiar with the discussions.
As the months went along, the president’s punching bags became Dobbs’s punching bags. Dobbs called former House speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), who has clashed frequently with Trump, “feckless,” “an annoying son of a gun,” “a K Street-owned RINO” and an “ignoramus” — and that was during just one show last November. Ryan declined to comment through a spokesman.
The phenomenon of Trump and Dobbs as almost a single brain connected not by neurons, but by cable wires, has been reinforced by repetition.

The president has what he calls a “Super TiVo,” a system in which he records programs so he can watch them whenever and wherever he wants. Suddenly, it was almost impossible to be in Trump’s orbit without seeing Dobbs’s face.

Dobbs is often playing on Air Force One and in the presidential dining room, according to a supporter who has spent time in both places with Trump but was not authorized to speak publicly. It’s not uncommon, the supporter said, for Trump to pause mid-conversation and turn up the volume to catch something Dobbs is saying.
“I respect his commentary — I would say, based not on my talking to him but my listening, that he feels very strongly about strength at the border, and so do I,” Trump told The Post.

[The perilous high-wire act of writing speeches for Donald Trump]

Managing Dobbs can be treacherous. Former deputy White House chief of staff Bill Shine, a onetime top Fox News executive, strained to reassure Dobbs that Trump would follow through on promises to take dramatic immigration measures. A White House official, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said Trump grew frustrated with Shine as Dobbs carried on with monologues saying Trump was not taking a hard enough line on immigration.

“The president noticed that, and that was the start of Bill’s problems, in some ways,” the official said.

The firebrand anchor was pushing for quick action.
“This is the president of the United States,” Dobbs told his audience in January. “He says a wall should be built. That it’s a national emergency. At that point the nation should rally behind him.”
A month later, Dobbs got his wish: the president declared a national emergency.
Shine, in office for just eight months, was out of a job before the national emergency went to a vote in Congress.
Even after the national emergency declaration, Dobbs was grumpy. He set his sights on Nielsen, the beleaguered DHS secretary, who’d managed to anger immigrant advocates who thought she was too tough and the president who was pushing her to be tougher.

In early March, Dobbs was asking, “Why doesn’t Trump fire Kirstjen Nielsen?”
Within weeks Nielsen was announcing her resignation.
Many Trump allies say Dobbs’s repeated criticism of Nielsen, more than anything else, made her position untenable in the administration.
“Think about it,” said one ally who works closely with the administration on immigration and requested anonymity to speak candidly. “Every night at 7 p.m. on Fox you’re getting slammed by Lou as the president watches.”
'What time is it on, again?'
As Dobbs’s influence with the White House has seemed to grow, some Washington power players who’d barely paid attention to him have been forced to take notice.
“He matters because the president watches,” a White House official said. “Members of Congress who figure that out, will ask us, ‘What time is it on, again?’ ”
But at the White House, where Trump keeps his Super TiVo humming, the time doesn’t matter because the president can watch whenever he likes. The April 10 show gave Trump something he loved.
The anchor featured a poll showing Trump with a 55 percent approval rating. Trump tweeted an image of the graphic and wrote, “Great news! #MAGA.”
It turns out that poll actually showed 55 percent of respondents had an unfavorable view of the president, and only 41 percent viewed him favorably. Amid an uproar of condemnation, Fox Business corrected the error.
But two weeks later, the false poll results live on, undeleted and uncorrected — they’re right there on Trump’s Twitter timeline, for all to see. The American flag logo in the bottom left-hand corner reads: Lou Dobbs Tonight.

Alice Crites in Washington and Caren Lissner in Hoboken, N.J., contributed to this report.

Somerset Maugham

Charles Cutting

Stephen Pearl Andrews (March 22, 1812 – May 21, 1886) was an American individualist anarchist, linguist, political philosopher, outspoken abolitionist and author of several books on the labor movement and individualist anarchism.

Ian MacBean – MI 6 British intelligence agent

Beijing shows off heritage, creativity, cultural exports
By Yin Ruowei | China Daily | 2019-04-27

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201904/27/WS5cc3d2bea3104842260b8b82.html










PageOne Bookstore at Beijing Fun, a commercial and cultural complex. [Photo by Wang Zhuangfei/China Daily]

More than 450 journalists from BRI countries and regions tour city, learn about history, business-boosting efforts

The second Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation, taking place from Thursday to Saturday, is giving Beijing the chance to show off its longtime efforts in preserving cultural heritage, developing the creative industry and promoting cultural exports.

More than 450 journalists from the countries and regions involved the Belt and Road Initiative, including nearly 400 from abroad, were invited by the Press Center of the forum and the Beijing Information Office to join in a three-day city tour that started on Tuesday.

According to local officials, foreign journalists learned more about the ancient capital's history, traditional Chinese culture and the creative industry's efforts to combine a modern lifestyle with Oriental elements on a visit to the Museum of Confucius Temple and Guozijian, or the Imperial College, as well as the 77 Creative Park on the first day of the tour.

"This is my first trip to Beijing," said Alex from Chile. "Beijing's Confucius Temple and the Imperial College are what I most look forward to visiting."

"My house in Santiago is close to a Confucius Institute and many of my friends are learning Chinese so I've become very interested in traditional Chinese culture."

The Confucius Temple and the Imperial College, showcasing Chinese people's respect and thirst for knowledge, served as a bridge between ancient China and the outside world.


Many journalists were amazed to learn that since the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644), the Imperial College had been recruiting students from other countries including Japan, Vietnam, Thailand and Russia.

Quotes of the month
“What happened to Kennedy is nearly what happened to me. America is in danger of upheavals. But you'll see. All of them together will observe the law of silence. They will close ranks. They'll do everything to stifle the scandal. They will throw Noah's cloak over these shameful deeds. In order to not lose face in front of the whole world. In order to not risk unleashing riots in the United States. In order to preserve the union and to avoid a new civil war. In order to not ask themselves questions. They don't want to know. They don't want to find
out. They won't allow themselves to find out."
~ French president after returning to Paris from JFK's funeral on November 24th, 1963 (Peyrefitte's memoir in "It Was de Gaulle")
- Charles de Gaulle

I never make the same mistake twice ...I make it like five or six times, you  know .....just to be sure
I am currently under construction .. thank you for your patience 

" People often say that motivation doesn't last. Well, neither does bathing - that's why we recomment it daily"  ,,, Zig Ziglar

William Vincent Astor

Mr. Obama arrived in the Senate in 2005, while Mr. Biden had been toiling away there since 1973.

CreditBrendan Smialowski/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Scientology Golden Dawn- “An invitation to freedom? Sign me up!!

CNN host Lou Dobbs is confronted by protesters and escorted by police during a march on the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday in New York in 2008. (Chip East/Reuters)

Mansfield_Cumming_Admiral Sir George Mansfield Smith-Cumming headed the new Foreign Section of the British Secret Service.

Mr. Biden in 2012 at a campaign field office in Ottumwa, Iowa. Heading into the re-election campaign, Mr. Obama’s political advisers secretly explored replacing Mr. Biden with Hillary Clinton on the ticket. But Mr. Obama brushed off the idea.CreditBrendan Hoffman for The New York Times

Here are some quotes from that book:

Scientology is therefore Universology developed in the spirit of the Exact Sciences, and is wholly new in kind. It is the Core or Centre and the most distinctive Department of Universology… (page 37)
Scientology will re-assert and vindicate… Spiritualistic Realities and Tendencies…
(page 146)
It will be the supreme triumph of Scientology, the Exact Branch of this new Universal Science, to exhibit in Diagram, and by illustrative object-teaching, all the Root-thoughts of which the Human Mind is capable… (page 165)
The same year that Andrews started the idea of Scientology, the Cecil family took up the idea.
In 1871, Arthur Balfour and his in-laws form a private group to study paranormal phenomena.

* * *
Psychiatrist Josef Breuer was treating Bertha Pappenheim in the summer of 1880.
He found that when she recalled a series of memories back to a traumatic memory, one of her many symptoms would disappear. Breuer drew two important conclusions from his work with Bertha: that her symptoms were the result of thoughts that were buried in her unconscious and that when these thoughts were spoken and became conscious, the symptoms disappeared.
Breuer called this catharsis therapy. It was also called abreactive therapy and talking therapy.
Catharsis or abreactive therapy –
The process of bringing repressed ideas and feelings into consciousness.
It is the reliving of past traumatic incidents buried in the subconscious.

Sigmund Freud began using this cathartic treatment under Breuer’s guidance.

In 1882, Arthur Balfour created the Society for Psychical Research. They conducted scientific research into mental and spiritual phenomena. They developed the subjects of Dianetics and Scientology. All the basic mental, spiritual, and religious ideas in Dianetics and Scientology were developed by the SPR, before L. Ron Hubbard was even born. That includes the therapy used.
Sigmund Freud was a member of the Society for Psychical Research. The SPR also conducted extensive research into catharsis therapy. The subjects of Dianetics and Scientology were tied together from the beginning and both subjects were underneath the Cecil family, which means underneath British intelligence.
When Ron Hubbard was a teenager he was recruited by British intelligence.

Thereafter he executed one intelligence assignment after the other for his entire life.
They groomed Hubbard to be the front man for their subjects of Dianetics and Scientology.

You can read about that in Scientology Roots Chapter Seven – The First Scientologists and Their Masters.
The common denominator that explains all of Hubbard’s actions in life ….

Ron Hubbard told Scientologists to support the British New World Order.
He advocates the worst sociopaths in the world having direct control over the life of every individual person.

The basic technology of radio-based detection and tracking evolved independently and with great secrecy in a number of nations during the second half of the 1930s. At the start of the war in Europe in September 1939, both Great Britain and Germany had begun the actual military use of these systems. In Great Britain this technology was called RDF, standing for Range and Direction Finding, while in Germany the name Funkmessgerät (radio measuring device) was often used.
Little known factoid: The acronym RADAR (for RAdio Detection And Ranging) was coined by the U.S. Navy in 1940, and the subsequent name “radar” was soon widely used.
Hubbard’s mission was to explore not only what the problem areas were, and if the cause could be established beyond simple storm conditions, as well as testing ideas on how to improve range, clarity versus loss of signal, and tracking magnetic interference “zones” largely caused by polar magnetism and to some degree, in certain locations, from solar flares commonly known as “Northern Lights”. Russia’s alliance with Germany, combined with Japanese incursions in the North-east coastline of China made Alaska suddenly very key to the United States and Britain, militarily.
Ketchikan, where Hubbard ended up, was a particularly key industrial and manufacturing city, but back in the time when radio was still quite fledgling, (the 1930’s) it suffered from severe problems with radio communications, largely due to extreme weather conditions and other more confounding influences. This, of course, made radio-direction finding for ship and plane navigation (and submarines) a very urgent problem.
Using his “intimates” at the Explorer’s Club, he carried an Explorer’s Club Flag (#105) which provided the first layer of intelligence cover – with the commonly used British “I’m on expedition” cover.
He called it “Alaskan Radio-Experimental Expedition”, with the outer stated purpose being to update the U.S. Coast Pilot guide regarding the coastlines of Alaska and B.C. Although he did that, that’s not the real reason, as we already covered.
When he tied up his sloop, the Magician, at Thomas Basin in Ketchikn on Friday, August 31, 1940 what he told other people was that his purpose in coming to Alaska “was two-fold, one to win a bet and another to gather material for a novel of Alaskan salmon fishing”. (The Ketchikan Chronicle).

So, he also employed the well-used by British intelligence agents (like Somerset Maugham) “writer” intelligence cover and even the “just here for the fishing” one! (also known as a shore story).

Evidence That L. Ron Hubbard Was Working For British Intelligence In 1940, 1941, and 1942
 https://mikemcclaughry.wordpress.com/2017/11/08/evidence-that-l-ron-hubbard-was-working-for-british-intelligence-in-1940-1941-and-1942
November 8th, 2017- McClaughry
It was on June 11, 1940 that William Stephenson arrived in New York to start the British Security Coordination to get America into the war – WWII. He arrived aboard the SS Britannic with John Arthur Reed Pepper (his SIS man) and family in tow.
The first order of business was getting a “control” point for Secret Intelligence work. Someone who was fully aboard the British agenda and more importantly, would do whatever the British told him to do. Vincent Astor, with numerous familial connections into British high society, was chosen to hold that function while a more permanent arrangement was being worked on. (the COI, then the OSS).
Every step of the way was controlled by the British.
Stephenson told President Roosevelt, Roosevelt told the Secretary of the Navy, who then told the Chief of Naval Operations that Astor would now be unofficially in charge of ALL intelligence work in the New York area, including the Office of Naval Intelligence in New York City. This is the Third Naval District (abbreviation – 3ND).
No questions asked – that’s the way it IS kind of thing.
This also means that Astor is in charge of any agent selection/recommendations etc. in the New York area both then and when the 1939 Foreign Espionage function was transferred to the Foreign Intelligence Branch (OP-16-F-9) in early 1941.
The New York area was basically the who’s who in intelligence. Anywhere from William Donovan to David K.E. Bruce to John Riheldaffer (head of OP-16-F-9) to people like L. Ron Hubbard.

L. Ron Hubbard had already connected up with the Astor “secret” intelligence/naval reserve organization called the ROOM, and because of those connections had gained entrance to the Explorer’s Club of New York – being officially made a member in February of 1940.
Astor is actually even referred to as the “British Intelligence” section at the 3rd naval district, as I am about to show you.
There are a number of other significant events in the British intelligence community occurring right in this time frame. You can peruse a timeline of some of the main ones in my post: Straightening Out The Timeline Around Hubbard’s Intelligence Background – Plus a few other things.
Right after Astor was ensconced in the Third Naval District, Hubbard was sent on a naval intelligence mission for Stephenson and the BSC (who is who was actually controlling Astor).
William Stephenson told President Roosevelt, and Roosevelt told his cabinet, that they needed to recognize the great potential (and threat in enemy hands) of radio-based detection and tracking, and began the development of ship- and land-based systems. The first of these were fielded by the U.S. Navy in early 1940, hence Hubbard’s involvement as a civilian intelligence agent (remember the ROOMs heavy ties to the U.S. navy).

Hubbard was being engaged to assist the British (through his connections to Astor’s ROOM and its corresponding Explorer’s Club members) in the Alaskan deployment of Range and Direction Finding.

Note: The fact that he was doing this for British Intelligence and he was knowledgeable of MI6 agent Alistair Crowley, appears to have had no small amount of bearing on naming his ship for the trip – The Magician. Crowley’s intelligence cover throughout his career was that of an “occult magician”.

Vincent Astor aboard the Nourmahal

Scientology Stage

Between 1932 and 1941 Hubbard traveled extensively in Central America.    59


Roosevelt Meeting With Round Table
In 1932 Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected President of the United States. Roosevelt immediately goes to meet with Round Table members at Cliveden.  45  Franklin Roosevelt then assumed office as American President from 1933 to 1945.
Starting in 1933, Vincent Astor served as the intermediary for intelligence gathered by ROOM members and their agents, forwarding intelligence directly to President Franklin Roosevelt.
Roosevelt went to the Nourmahal for rest, and to escape from the burdens of office during the early years of his presidency. “This is the only place I can get away from people, telephones and uniforms,” Roosevelt wrote a friend in 1934.  31

Four years ago, Barack Obama gently discouraged him from running for president, but Joseph R. Biden Jr. is back and presenting himself as Mr. Obama’s natural heir.

Waldorf and Nancy Astor. Waldorf Astor was an early member of the Round Table. He and his wife Nancy lived in an estate called Cliveden.

Does Society Realize It Is Being Initiated?
Truthstream Media

Looks at Wikipedia's description of Satanism which has been written in an extremely positive light, as though Wikipedia was promoting  Satanism ...... looks at Satanism and witchcraft becoming mainstream in the media, movies and music ....
Please help support us on Patreon, read our goals here: https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia Truthstream Can Be Found Here: Our Film: TheMindsofMen.net Site: http://TruthstreamMedia.com Twitter: @TruthstreamNews Backup Vimeo: Vimeo.com/truthstreammedia DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX

Starting in 1929, Ron Hubbard starts studying Scientology material. You can read about that in –
Scientology Roots Chapter Seven – The First Scientologists and Their Masters
1930 – Ron Hubbard enrolls in George Washington University where he studies civil engineering.
In 1931, Paul Linebarger was a student in the School of Engineering at George Washington University.
Paul Linebarger and Ron Hubbard met and became friends. The Hatchet was the college paper which had a supplement called the Literary Review, and Paul Linebarger was the editor. On 9 February 1932 Paul published Hubbard’s first story called “Tah”.   84,  85 
  

Paul Myron Anthony Linebarger

Where Is Shelly Miscavige? New Details About Scientology Leader David Miscavige's Wife Who Hasn't Been Seen Publicly In Years
LIKE US ON FACEBOOK If you 'like' us, we'll LOVE you!

https://www.yourtango.com/2019321597/where-shelly-miscavige-new-details-missing-scientology-leader-wife

Entertainment And News February 12, 2019  Contributor Sarah Gangraw
Leah Remini  EXPOSES  Scientology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6oYaMtJln0   2,229,021 views


Ken Ammi Published on Nov 1, 2015
Leah Remini stated that at Tom Cruise's wedding he sang "You lost that loving feeling" to Katie Holmes and how odd that was. Indeed, at the actual wedding he is singing, "You've lost that lovin' feelin' / Now it's gone, gone, gone, whoa / Now there's no welcome look in your eyes when I reach for you / And now you're starting to criticize the things I do / It makes me just feel like crying (baby) / 'Cause baby, something beautiful's dying”-----------ooohhh, how very romantic. See my articles on Scientology here: http://www.truefreethinker.com/tag/sc... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You can visit me here: True Freethinker: http://www.truefreethinker.com Backup video channel: https://archive.org/details/@ken_ammi Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/True-Fr... Twitter: http://twitter.com/TrueFreethinker Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheism_... Google+ https://plus.google.com/1097521033645.

Where Is Shelly Miscavige ? - Wife of Scientology Head David  Miscavige 
Where Is Scientology Leader's Wife? Leah Remini Says 'I Still Don't Have an Answer' about Friend Shelly Miscavige  
Is Shelly Miscavige missing?

Scientology High Priestess Shelly Miscavige   

Scientology leader David Miscavige's wife has not been seen publicly in 13 years — and some fear she will never be seen again. Shelly Miscavige, dubbed the "Queen of Scientology," was last seen at her father's funeral in 2007. Her husband's father, Ron Miscavige, who left the church in 2012, fears Shelly will "never be free."
“These are pretty bad people, but they don’t have a conscience and that lets them do it," he told 60 Minutes reporter Tara Brown in an interview Sunday. Shelly and David took leadership of the church in 1986 after the death of Scientology founder L. Rob Hubbard. Despite their high-profile status in the church, only David has made public appearances in recent years, never addressing the question haunting Shelly's friends and family: Where is Shelly Miscavige?

RELATED: 5 Sad New Details About The Kidnapping And Assault Of Two People At A Scientology Rehab
RELATED: 7 Bombshells We Learned About The Cruise Family From Leah Remini
RELATED: 9 Crazy New Details Revealed About Tom Cruise And John Travolta's Scientology Feud


Here's what we know.

1. Leah Rimini believes the church is hiding something.
2. Actress Leah Remini, a friend of Shelly who defected from Scientology years ago, has reason to believe the church is hiding something in regards to Shelly's disappearance.
3. “‘Shelly is fine, and she’s alive.’ … That’s the PR line. I don’t believe that,” she shared on 60 Minutes on Sunday.
4. There have been many theories as to what happened to Shelly, but none have been met with answers. The questions about Shelly's whereabouts have, though, been met with fiery responses from the church.
5. “Ron Miscavige is seeking to make money on the name of his famous son. Any father exploiting his son in this manner is a sad exercise in betrayal," the Church of Scientology said in a statement to Page Six Sunday. "Leah Remini has been stalking Mr. and Mrs. Miscavige for years because of her psychotic obsession. It is time for her to stop.”
6. Adding to the concern are the multitude of complaints and accusations against the Church of Scientology over the years, including claims of sexual assault, abuse, and being held prisoner by the cult-like church. 
7. She was last seen at her father's funeral. 
Shelly made her last public appearance following the death of her father. She attended his funeral in 2007, where she was heavily escorted and has reportedly not been seen since. But prior to the funeral, Shelly was last seen in 2005, raising questions as to where she was for the almost two years leading up to her father's funeral.

8.  Her relationship with her husband was business-like.
According to those who were close to the Miscaviges, David seemed more like Shelly's boss than a husband, a 2014 report by Vanity Fair revealed.
“I never, ever, ever saw them kiss,” said Marc Headley, who with the Miscaviges for over a decade. “I was there for 15 years... So I had plenty of opportunities to witness them together and never, ever saw them affectionate with each other... I’m talking about in a room with four other people. Informal. We’re all just chatting, and he isn’t touching her.”
After they married, Shelly was appointed to Chairman of the Board Assistant, which put her in charge of the executive staff at the church. Throughout her time as C.O.B. Assistant, others noticed her and her husband's relationship seemed anything but romantic. The pair even reportedly slept in separate beds in different rooms.
“Odd, odd couple,” said former Sea Org member, Tom De Vocht. “There was obviously a working relationship, but odd. I don’t think I once saw Miscavige hug or kiss or anything Shelly. I spent a lot of time with them. There was no real affection.”

9. She may have been banished by her husband. 
Many ex-Scientologists believe Shelly was exiled by David to live in a compound with no contact with the outside world. The church, when questioned by its members about Shelly's location, held on to answers like, "She's on a special project" or "She's visiting relatives," but many did not see truth in its responses.
“The law [in Scientology] is: The closer to David Miscavige you get, the harder you’re going to fall,” Claire Headley, an ex-Scientologist who worked closely with the Miscaviges with her husband, Marc, explained to Vanity Fair in 2014. “It’s like the law of gravity, practically. It’s just a matter of when.”
It quickly became as though Shelly did not exist and her sudden disappearance was never discussed by church members.

. No one wanted to talk about her disappearance.

In 2006, Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes married and their wedding was considered "the wedding of the century in the church," according to Remini. But Shelly was not there, and no one would answer Remini when she asked why.
“I asked innocently, ‘where’s Shelly?’ because I thought it was odd,” Leah said on Conan. “They were calling it the wedding of the century in the church… And with that there was a reaction of people just scattering. They didn’t want any part of this. Literally just scattered.”
Remini said she was belittled by church officials for even asking about her friend's whereabouts.
“I had gone to the church and I asked the spokesperson at the time, Tom Davis, ‘Where is Shelly? I think it’s weird she’s not here,'” Leah continued. “And he said, ‘You don’t have the f—ing rank to be asking about the leader’s wife.'”

10.  She was reported missing in 2013. 

Remini left the Church of Scientology in 2013. At this point, she had not seen Shelly in eight years and was determined to find out where she went — and if she was still alive. 
Remini filed a missing persons report with the Los Angeles Police Department, but nothing ever became of it. The LAPD said the report was "unfounded," according to 9News, and did not lead to any answers regarding Shelly's whereabouts or disappearance. Police said that they met with Shelly and closed the case. The church has since claimed Remini's police report was filed in bad faith and questioned the ex-scientologist's credibility.
“What matters to me is that I have not seen proof that this woman is alive, or doing well, so I can give a shit what the LAPD said as their bullshit statement that they put out, because I haven’t seen her face. I’m calling bullshit on it,” Remini told the Daily Beast in 2017.

.It is possible she is dead.
On a December 2016 episode of her A&E series Scientology and the Aftermath, Remini revealed that she believes her friend may be dead.
“I do NOT know that she is alive," she said, adding that she would be happy to be proven wrong. But until then, Remini is dedicated to finding the truth about Shelly and her disappearance. 
“I’m going to continue to get and gather information," she vowed.

 Some believe she is being held against her will.

Tony Ortega, the world's premier reporter on Scientology, is convinced Shelly is being held at the Church of Spiritual Technology (CST), a complex near Lake Arrowhead, CA, where Scientologist are readying themselves for Armageddon, he told the Daily Beast in 2015. He and Mike Rinder, a former senior executive in the church, believe Shelly is locked up in the bunkers and vaults of the compound and is not allowed to leave.
“Mike and I are pretty positive that in 2005, once Dave [Miscavige] had his blow-up with her, he sent her up there to be a non-person,” Ortega said. “They let her out for a couple of days for her father’s funeral in the summer of 2007, and nobody has seen her since. I’m positive she’s still there, and I have my sources saying that she’s still there.”

Sarah Gangraw writes about all things news, entertainment and crime. You can follow her on Instagram and Twitter.

David Miscavige, Head of Scientology.org

More MI 6 Psychs Using Abreactive Therapy
In 1935, psycho-psychiatrist William Sargant went to work at Maudsley Hospital, where he worked along with psychiatrist John Rawlings Rees. Sargant used abreactive therapy in conjunction with drugs and electroshock, just like John Rees was doing during World War I.

William Walters Sargant .Sargant experimented with numerous vicious drugs and drugs given in combination. He also performed leucotomies. Sargant spent 38 years butchering people with his horrific treatments.

Where is the missing wife of Scientology's ruthless leader? | 60 Minutes Australia
60 Minutes Australia 
Published on Feb 11, 2019
https://youtu.be/P7QWifeY2_A

Shelly Miscavige is the wife of Scientology leader David Miscavige, the high priestess of Scientology who vanished 13 years ago. 60 Minutes investigate into the missing Queen’s whereabouts and speak to the former Scientologist’s who want answers. WATCH more of 60 Minutes Australia: https://www.60minutes.com.au LIKE 60 Minutes Australia on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/60Minutes9 FOLLOW 60 Minutes Australia on Twitter: https://twitter.com/60Mins FOLLOW 60 Minutes Australia on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/60minutes9 For forty years, 60 Minutes have been telling Australians the world’s greatest stories. Tales that changed history, our nation and our lives. Reporters Liz Hayes, Allison Langdon, Tara Brown, Charles Wooley, Liam Bartlett and Tom Steinfort look past the headlines because there is always a bigger picture. Sundays are for 60 Minutes. #60MinutesAustralia
​Type your paragraph here.

President-elect Barack Obama and Vice President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. in 2008 in Chicago after winning that year’s presidential election.

Doug Mills/The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/  

THE LONG RUN

Biden and Obama’s ‘Odd Couple’ Relationship Aged Into Family Ties

Four years ago, Barack Obama gently discouraged him from running for president, but Joseph R. Biden Jr. is back and presenting himself as Mr. Obama’s natural heir.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/28/us/politics/barack-obama-biden.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage 

By Peter Baker    April 28, 2019

WASHINGTON — Barack Obama did not think Joseph R. Biden Jr. should run for president — he hardly needed to say it out loud for aides to understand that. The trick that summer of 2015 was finding a way to nudge Mr. Biden to stay out of the race without looking as if he was nudging Mr. Biden to stay out of the race.

By the time that Mr. Biden began weighing a campaign, the president had long since concluded that Hillary Clinton had the best chance of winning in 2016. Beyond that, Mr. Biden was awash in grief over the death of his son, hardly the state of mind for a grueling presidential marathon.

But Mr. Obama did not want to push and sought to give his vice president room to come to the decision himself. Over the course of weekly lunches, he gently pressed Mr. Biden on his thinking. Eventually, the president arranged for his own strategist to deliver a daunting assessment of the odds against a race. Mr. Biden got the message. “The president was not encouraging,” he later acknowledged.

Those difficult days in the seventh year of their partnership illustrated just how far the two had come — and the limits of their alliance, as well. What started out as a Felix-and-Oscar odd couple bringing together a reserved, no-drama, new-generation intellectual and a gregarious, shoulder-squeezing, old-generation pol evolved into a surprisingly close friendship unlike any between a president and vice president in modern times.

Yet when the moment arrived, it did not fall to Mr. Biden to carry on Mr. Obama’s legacy — at least not then. The question now, as Mr. Biden kicks off the campaign that Mr. Obama helped talk him out of four years ago, is whether he can parlay his service for the last Democratic president into his own successful quest.

Mr. Biden, 76, may position himself as Mr. Obama’s natural heir, but he has yet to convince Democrats. Younger candidates like Pete Buttigieg and Beto O’Rourke are often described as the new Mr. Obama. While the former president praised Mr. Biden after his announcement, he does not plan to endorse any candidate for the nomination.

“Biden was a strong partner to Obama as vice president and, as he begins, clearly is deriving the political benefit of it within the Democratic electorate,” said David Axelrod, who was Mr. Obama’s senior adviser. “But others will claim pieces of that legacy, and it would be a mistake to assume that this alone will deliver the nomination to him.”

Denis R. McDonough, the former White House chief of staff, said Mr. Obama clearly thinks Mr. Biden is prepared to be president, otherwise he never would have picked him for vice president. “But the president has also said there are a lot of good candidates in the race, and he thinks it’s important for the party to make this choice about moving forward. A full primary contest is good for the party.”

‘Articulate and Bright’

Presidents and vice presidents are rarely friends, but often onetime rivals thrown together to unify a party for a general election, as with John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson or Ronald Reagan and George Bush. Kennedy and Johnson never grew close. Reagan and Bush did, at least on some level. Others started out close only to grow apart by the end, as with Bill Clinton and Al Gore or George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.

The relationship between Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden, two men separated by temperament, upbringing, outlook and 19 years, did not get off to a strong start. Mr. Obama arrived in the Senate in 2005 the darling of Democrats, while Mr. Biden had been toiling away there since 1973, working his way through the ranks.

Mr. Obama was assigned to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee where Mr. Biden was chairman, but the newcomer found the panel frustrating and its leader maddeningly long-winded. At one hearing, while Mr. Biden pontificated at length, Mr. Obama passed a note to an aide: “Shoot. Me. Now.”

Soon enough, Mr. Obama escaped to the campaign trail, first stumping for other Democrats in the 2006 midterm elections and then for himself as 2008 approached. Mr. Biden, whose first run for the White House had blown up in a plagiarism scandal in 1988, jumped into the race, too. But he could hardly compete with Mr. Obama’s star power.

Nor could Mr. Biden discipline his own tongue, committing a gaffe on the very day he announced his campaign when he described Mr. Obama’s appeal. “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” Mr. Biden said.

When the comment blew up, Mr. Biden expressed regret and called Mr. Obama, who publicly let him off the hook. “I have no problem with Joe Biden,” he told reporters.

He had no problem with Joe Biden on the hustings, either, easily outpacing the older man among Democratic voters. As Mr. Obama handily won Iowa’s caucuses, Mr. Biden could not muster even 1 percent of the vote, forcing him to drop out.

A spotlight on the people reshaping our politics. A conversation with voters across the country. And a guiding hand through the endless news cycle, telling you what you really need to know.

By summertime, after Mr. Obama dispatched Mrs. Clinton to clinch the nomination, Mr. Biden came back on the radar screen as his first choice among three finalists for running mate. When Mr. Biden resisted, Mr. Obama persisted.

“He didn’t really want to be vice president, and they talked back and forth and Obama convinced him,” said former Senator Ted Kaufman, a longtime adviser who took Mr. Biden’s seat. “And the centerpiece was he’d be the last person in the room” for any decision.


‘Heading in Direction Z’

It was an odd choice for a candidate running as an outsider, but Mr. Obama hoped to reassure voters concerned about his inexperience and, perhaps, his racial background.

It was an odd choice, too, for Mr. Biden, who had never really worked for anyone else. But his family pressed him to say yes. When he expressed misgivings to his wife, Jill, he told friends, she replied, “Grow up.” His mother said he could not turn down the chance to help elect the first African-American president.

Their partnership sealed at their party’s convention, the two went their separate ways, crisscrossing the country on their own planes. It was not until they won that they really began to spend time together and get to know each other.

Mr. Biden was to play the sage mentor, helping an unseasoned president navigate the treacherous politics of the capital. But the first months were difficult. The two crossed wires more than once.

When the speak-first, think-later vice president said that in fashioning an economic stimulus program there was a “30 percent chance we’re going to get it wrong,” an irritated president dismissed it — and him. “I don’t remember exactly what Joe was referring to — not surprisingly,” Mr. Obama told reporters.

Mr. Biden was peeved and raised it at their next private lunch. He should not be portrayed as the wacky “Uncle Joe” of the administration, he told Mr. Obama. The president agreed to not diminish his partner in public.

But they were still on different wavelengths. At meetings, there was usually a good deal of eye rolling when Mr. Biden began one of his long monologues. The vice president was the only person who would say “finally” four or five times before actually stopping, as one person in the room put it.

James B. Comey, then the F.B.I. director, described the dynamic in his memoir: “President Obama would have a series of exchanges heading a conversation very clearly and crisply in Direction A. Then, at some point, Biden would jump in with, ‘Can I ask something, Mr. President?’”

“Obama would politely agree,” Mr. Comey continued, “but something in his expression suggested he knew full well that for the next five or 10 minutes we would all be heading in Direction Z. After listening and patiently waiting, President Obama would then bring the conversation back on course.”

‘Unguided Missile’

For his part, Mr. Biden grew frustrated by Mr. Obama’s ponderous decision-making process. “He was deliberate to a fault,” Mr. Biden wrote diplomatically in his book, “Promise Me, Dad.”

He grew particularly exasperated by Mr. Obama’s reluctance to engage Congress. He thought the president’s team of advisers was not always deft in their handling of legislation or the politics of governance.

But he was careful to defer to Mr. Obama. “Every old hand is going to look askance at the judgments of the youngster,” said Jared Bernstein, Mr. Biden’s economics adviser, “but I never picked up any resentment or hostility at all.”

Mr. Biden was given some of the highest-profile assignments of Mr. Obama’s presidency, including overseeing the stimulus program, managing the withdrawal of troops from Iraq and drafting an ultimately failed gun control package.

He was also the in-house skeptic on the use of force, arguing against a troop surge to Afghanistan, military intervention in Libya and the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. That put him on the opposite side of many debates with Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who in his memoir called the vice president “wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.”

Mr. Obama did not see it that way, but as Benjamin J. Rhodes, his deputy national security adviser, put it in his own book, “In the Situation Room, Biden could be something of an unguided missile.”

In the debate over Afghanistan, Mr. Biden argued against sending 40,000 troops requested by the generals on top of 68,000 already deployed, and he promoted a more limited counterterrorism strategy. Over months of debate, other officials concluded that Mr. Biden was deliberately taking a more aggressive position to let the president keep his own thoughts to himself.

“Biden really played a role of challenging assumptions from the Pentagon and being the bad guy in the Situation Room that allowed the president a lot more decision-making space,” said Jay Carney, Mr. Biden’s communications director before becoming White House press secretary.

In the end, Mr. Obama gave the military most but not all of the troopsrequested while setting a two-year timeline for withdrawal. Mr. Biden’s contrarian position, Mr. Obama later said, was useful. “Joe, in that sense, can help stir the pot,” he told The New York Times.

‘I Was Really Angry’

In some ways, Mr. Biden became the human face of an administration led by a president known for robotic stoicism. Where Mr. Obama rarely revealed any inner life, Mr. Biden rarely disguised his. Anger, joy, frustration, eagerness — if he felt it, he expressed it.

Nor did he hide when he disagreed with the president. “Joe did not hesitate to say, ‘I think he’s going in the wrong direction,’” said Leon E. Panetta, who succeeded Mr. Gates at the Pentagon. As an example, he cited the vice president’s feeling that the president’s team was not sufficiently sensitive to concerns of Catholics about abortion and contraceptive coverage by insurance companies.

But Mr. Panetta said Mr. Biden never took defeat personally. “He didn’t bear it on his back,” he said. “He didn’t pout. He didn’t show that somehow he had been offended or have this hangdog look. He basically would come in the next day and it was Joe Biden all over again.”

Mr. Obama ceded to Mr. Biden tasks he clearly did not care for himself, most prominently negotiations with Congress. Time and again, it fell to Mr. Biden to parachute in to cut a deal that had eluded the president. In Mr. Biden, Republicans saw someone they could do business with when they gave up on Mr. Obama.

“Dealing with President Obama was like traveling on a one-way street — it was his way or the highway,” said former Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the House Republican leader during the Obama administration. “When you dealt with Joe Biden, you actually had the opportunity to be heard. He was interested in understanding your viewpoint.”

 

That did not always sit well with congressional Democrats, who at one point barred the vice president from budget talks for fear that he was not holding fast enough. And the president’s team often seemed more skeptical of Mr. Biden than of their own boss. Heading into the 2012 re-election campaign, Mr. Obama’s political advisers secretly explored replacing Mr. Biden with Mrs. Clinton on the ticket.

But Mr. Obama brushed off the idea. Not only would it call into question his judgment in putting Mr. Biden on the original ticket, but also the vice president was a useful surrogate in working-class communities where he connected with voters more than Mr. Obama did.

“He was able to go and campaign in places where it just didn’t make sense to send the president,” said Anita Dunn, an adviser to the White House.

Mr. Biden still veered off course. In response to a question during a television interview as the campaign heated up, he changed his position and endorsed same-sex marriage. Mr. Obama was still on record opposing it, but aides had created a careful plan to flip-flop without, they hoped, it looking like flip-flopping.

Mr. Biden’s staff knew instantly that he had upended that plan and sent a highlighted interview transcript to the president’s strategists to warn them. “I was really angry about this,” David Plouffe, the president’s senior adviser, recalled in an oral history. “We were completely shocked.”

Mr. Biden was unapologetic. “There was a little apoplexy around here,” he admitted later to The Times. “I answered as antiseptically as I could. But I was going to sit there and not say what I believe at this point in my career? They can have the goddamn job.”

 

‘You Are My Brother’

For all of that, Mr. Obama grew genuinely fond of his vice president, learning to appreciate Mr. Biden’s authenticity and embrace his contrary voice.

“You know what has surprised me?” Mr. Obama said at one of their lunches. “How we have become such good friends.”

“Surprised you?” Mr. Biden joked.

“Both of them came to understand that neither was going to change,” Mr. Rhodes said in an interview. “Obama came to understand that Biden was going to speak his mind and sometimes he was going to say things that weren’t on the script. That’s both his strength and his vulnerability, but you take someone for who they are.”

“And Biden,” he added, “came to understand that Obama was a different kind of politician than those people he served with in the Senate for all those years, but Obama had his strengths.”

Mr. McDonough said Mr. Obama genuinely believed picking Mr. Biden was his best decision. “It doesn’t mean there’s no tension,” he said. “That’s kind of the point. If you’re going to have a partner, there’s going to be tension. And it’s in the tension and in the turbulence that the relationship strengthens and ideas get better.”

The bond grew tighter when the vice president learned his son Beau had a brain tumor. Mr. Biden confided in the president, but few others. If the vice president arrived late for a morning intelligence briefing, Mr. Obama made eye contact as if to say, “Are you O.K.?”

“They got to the point that they could speak without actually saying anything,” Mr. Rhodes said.

When Mr. Biden weighed selling his house in Delaware to help Beau’s family, Mr. Obama offered to pay off the mortgage himself. When Beau died at age 46, it felt like a blow to Mr. Obama, too. “Joe,” an uncharacteristically emotional president told him during the eulogy, “you are my brother.”

‘The Great What-Ifs’


But Mr. Obama saw Mr. Biden’s exploration of a late presidential campaign as an expression of grief as much as anything else. Mr. Obama’s resistance “was from a good place,” said Mr. Rhodes, “from wanting the best for him in that moment.”

It was clear that Mr. Biden was not in an emotional state for a campaign for the White House. “His head was just someplace else,” Mr. Rhodes said. “And if you’re going to do three or four events a day in Iowa, it’s just hard to do that unless you’re all in.”

At their lunches, Mr. Obama cautioned Mr. Biden not to get too far out front so he did not look fickle if he did not run. “I’m very protective of your legacy,” Mr. Biden remembered the president telling him. “I really mean it.”

Mr. Obama urged the vice president to see Mr. Plouffe for some straight talk about his chances. Mr. Plouffe arrived with data suggesting that the vice president would not only lose, but he might also even finish third behind Mrs. Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, as The Atlantic reported.

Ultimately, Mr. Biden got close enough that he had drafted an announcement speech, but he opted not to run. The president made a point of letting Mr. Biden disclose his decision in the Rose Garden while standing next to him. More than a year later, Mr. Obama surprised a teary-eyed Mr. Biden with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Mr. Biden has never publicly expressed unhappiness with the president for discouraging him, but some who worked with him assume he felt it.

“In some ways, Joe felt the loyalty he had shown to the president and the fact that he was willing to go to bat on things he didn’t agree with should have earned him greater support from the president in terms of his own political career,” Mr. Panetta said.

Mrs. Clinton, of course, lost, and many wonder if Mr. Biden would have been the stronger candidate after all. As Mr. Rhodes put it, “One of the great what-ifs of history for me and a lot of people is if not for the Beau Biden tragedy, what would have happened?”

Mr. Biden would like to know, too. In his own way, he is trying to find out now.


Follow Peter Baker on Twitter: @peterbakernyt.

A version of this article appears in print on April 28, 2019, on Page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: The Evolution Of an Alliance At Biden’s Core. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe


Related Coverage

Obama Chooses Biden as Running Mate  Aug. 23, 2008

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/us/politics/24biden.html?action=click&module=RelatedCoverage&pgtype=Article&region=Footer

Joe Biden Concludes There’s No Time for a 2016 Runn  Oct. 21, 2015

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/22/us/joe-biden-concludes-theres-no-time-for-a-2016-run.html?action=click&module=RelatedCoverage&pgtype=Article&region=Footer

Obama Quietly Gives Advice to 2020 Democrats, but No Endorsement Feb. 18, 2019

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/18/us/politics/obama-2020-democratic-candidates.html?action=click&module=RelatedCoverage&pgtype=Article&region=Footer


Biden Didn’t Rush Into 2020. The Race Came to Him Anyway.    April 6, 2019
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/06/us/politics/biden-2020.html?action=click&module=RelatedCoverage&pgtype=Article&region=Footer

Wikipedia exposed: Dominated by drug organization trolls ; health information completely wrong
It is a running joke in credible circles that Wikipedia is among the worst on-line resources for obtaining information that is true about pretty much any issue

​​https://thetypicalindian.org/news/wikipedia-exposed-dominated-by-drug-organization-trolls-health-information-completely-wrong  

It is a running joke in credible circles that Wikipedia is among the worst on-line resources for obtaining information that is true about pretty much any issue. And a new study has confirmed that the popular user-created "fauxpedia" site is entirely overrun with misinformation, especially in areas relating to health and medicine.The study out of Campbell University in North Carolina found that up to 90 percent of the medical information posted on Wikipedia is untrue, which people simply can't rely on it for learning about health conditions and treatments. In nearly all important places of disease and wellness, posted entries were discovered to contain factual errors that either was flat out wrong or did not match scientific developments.​ "Research Workers must not use [Wikipedia] as a primary resource because those posts do not go through the same peer-review procedure as medical journals," said Robert Hasty, lead author of the study. "The finest resource when looking for a diagnosis will be to speak with your physician, who can consider your medical history and other factors to establish the best course of treatment."​Wikipedia 's more than 31 million entries deal with health-related problems, and the internet searches related to wellness. website typically shows up among the first few entries when running, As a result of this, a lot of people view Wikipedia as a reliable source of advice when, centered on the facts, it just isn't. "Wikipedia's visibility was made possible by its fundamental design as a collaborative database," wrote the authors. Wikipedia censors alternatives that are holistic, caters to other specific interests and drug companies. The collaborative aspect of Wikipedia's layout should allow for changing views on well-being to be presented alongside specific sources that back them. All things considered, if people from all walks of life and educational backgrounds are allowed to donate to the content of the site, then it should include the full spectrum of advice that the public can use to form an educated opinion.
But this is often not the case, especially when it comes to "alternative" or holistic medicine that bucks the status quo. The same is true for the conditions summarized in the new study, which includes things like heart disease and high blood pressure. Rather than present multiple options for prevention and treatment of these and other diseases, Wikipedia actively censors advice that deviates from the traditional norm of drugs and surgery, discounting the nutrition aspect, as an example."Drug companies have... been accused of editing Wikipedia to remove references to harmful side effects," clarifies Mail Online. "In 2009, workers at AstraZeneca supposedly deleted a sentence claiming a treatment for manic depression made teenagers 'more likely to consider harming or killing themselves.' "In some fields and some issues, you'll find groups who 'squat' on articles and insist on making them represent their particular biases," stated Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, referring to the scientific "skeptics" who habitually mistreat the website. "There is no credible mechanics [at Wikipedia] to approve versions of posts."

The British slavemasters want to eliminate national boundaries and establish a World Government that is run by them. Thus British propaganda states that nationalism is the cause of wars. That is a lie. Individual nations are not the cause of wars, the wars have been caused by the British nobility.
May 1938 – John W. Campbell given full authority for Astounding Science Fiction magazine.
May 1938 – Ron Hubbard goes to New York, Street and Smith want him to write for their newly acquired magazine, Astounding Science Fiction. Out of ALL the writers there could be, they choose Ron Hubbard?
Naw, this is a plan going into effect. A propaganda plan.
Now Hubbard is on his new British intelligence assignment as a sci-fi writer. British propaganda is under and done by British intelligence, so when Hubbard starts pumping out New World Order propaganda in his sci-fi stories, he is working for British intelligence.

Vincent Asto, William Donovan, David K.E. Bruce
William Wiseman, the head of MI6 in the United States, was a ROOM member.  
William Wiseman
William Donovan, future head of the Office of Strategic Services, was a member.
The entire atmosphere of The ROOM resembled an intelligence office. It’s code name was The Club.
All ROOM members were pro-British and The ROOM had a purpose to promote Anglo-American ties.  29
British author Somerset Maugham was a ROOM member. William Wiseman had recruited Maugham into MI6 in 1916. He used book writing as a cover for doing intelligence work.
Somerset Maugham
Some ROOM members belonged to the Explorers Club in New York City. The ROOM often worked together with other members of the Explorer’s Club, inviting them to their secret meetings.   124
ROOM members often used sailing trips, or “scientific expeditions” and “world exploration” as a cover for intelligence work. The Explorers Club flag was used for cover.
Some ROOM members who belonged to the Explorers Club were –
Charles Suydam Cutting
Theodore Roosevelt Jr.
Kermit Roosevelt
Clarence L. Hay
Suydam Cutting, Kermit Roosevelt and Teddy Roosevelt Jr. went on two intelligence missions into China and Tibet. Their cover story on one mission was they were “in search of the legendary big-horn wild sheep called Ovis Poli”. Their cover story on the other mission was they were “searching for the Giant Panda”.
Their intelligence mission had to do with an alliance between Britain, America, and Japan to try and control Tibet and reincarnate something called the “Shambhala Project” – which was a previous British intelligence plan meant to bring the East under Britain.  2
Charles Cutting
Theodore Roosevelt Jr.
Though never attached formally to The ROOM, Franklin Roosevelt knew every member well. Roosevelt met with ROOM members aboard Vincent Astor’s yacht, the Nourmahal, where they spent long hours drinking, gambling, fishing, “frumping” and pursuing amorous adventure.  30

Puerto Rico became a United States possession at the end of the Spanish-American war.
Pedro Albizu Campos was the leading advocate for Puerto Rican independence.
Campos was elected president of the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party in 1930.  37

Dr. Cornelius P. Rhoads was doing medical research for the Rockefeller Institute at San Juan Presbyterian Hospital. In November 1931, when Rhoads was about to complete his research for Rockefeller, he wrote a letter that said:
…the Porto Ricans — they are beyond doubt the dirtiest, laziest, most degenerate and thievish race of men ever inhabiting this sphere. It makes you sick to inhabit the same island with them. What the island needs is not public health work, but a tidal wave or something to totally exterminate the population. I have done my best to further the process of extermination by killing off 8 and transplanting into several more. The matter of consideration for the patient’s welfare plays no role here — in fact, all physicians take delight in the abuse and torture of the unfortunate subjects.

When lab workers in the Presbyterian Hospital found the letter and photocopied it, all hell broke lose. The letter reached Campos, who displayed it for all Puerto Ricans to see, thus sparking a revolution amongst the Puerto Ricans. In January 1932, Campos published an article accusing Dr. Rhoads of killing Puerto Rican patients. Campos continued to make an international flap out of it.
Hubbard dropped out of college in 1932 and immediately went on an intelligence mission to Puerto Rico. He made two lengthy trips to Puerto Rico, which was a political nightmare at the time. The people in Puerto Rico were demanding independence.
The first cover story he used was he was going on a “Caribbean Motion Picture Expedition”. Hubbard rented the schooner Doris Hamlin and set sail on 24 June 1932. His final stopping point was Puerto Rico, where he got off the Doris Hamlin. Hubbard spent more than two weeks there in August 1932.  33, 34  Ship records show Hubbard departed San Juan on the SS Coamo on 25 August 1932.  35
Ron Hubbard’s second trip to Puerto Rico had the cover of him doing the “Puerto Rican Mineralogical Expedition”. Hubbard does this with a mining engineer named Joseph Buhrman Carper. Hubbard went to Puerto Rico on 26 October 1932, on board the USS Kittery. They spent a short time looking for gold in a river and the bulk of the time Hubbard was out gathering intelligence on the people in Puerto Rico who were rebelling.

The Real Wealth Gap — An Immortal Elite
 “Like members of a Ghostic cuktm we long to enter the next transcendent phase of or development, shedding our bodies and leaving them behind, along with our sins ans troubles.” ….Author Douglas Rushkokk
Truthstream Media
Please help support us on Patreon, read our goals here: https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia Truthstream Can Be Found Here: Our Film: TheMindsofMen.net Site: http://TruthstreamMedia.com Twitter: @TruthstreamNews DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX

William Donovan

Extract of INLNews Report of the New World Order _ Barrack Obama Report  PART III: 
UNDERSTANDING THE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGENDA
Mother of All mind control organizations: 
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London.  


"Obama would be the man tapped to realize the one-world slave labor and control grid..."....Henry Kissinger
The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations involved in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most astute among us. Most people react with disbelief and scepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have been conditioned (brainwashed) to react with scepticism by institutional and media influences that were created by the Mother of All mind control organizations: 

The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London

Please note there is no doubt on the evidence that the Jihadist crisis,the rapidly unfolding economic depression and accompanying misery for billions of people and the financial crisis the Henry Kissinger talks about, was no accident or natural set of events that the Rothschild-Rockefeller controlled mainstream media have tried desperately to get the average person to believe.. and have been very cleverly abd calculatedly panned, created,manipulated, financed, orchestrated and carried out under orders of those elite pushing for a new world order... Just by the words Henry Kissinger usses and the tone of his words leaves no doubt that he and his other corporate, financial and banking elite are more thatr happy that the world is in such a mess, as they have planned all this. along with the planned reduction of the world's population to under one billion, by various means,...war...starvation, man made earth quakes, Tsamies, disease, a regulated reduction of nuntrients, minerals and vitamins and increase in allowable pesticides and bovine growth hormones, geneticly modified foods etc in food through their  Codex Alimentarius Commission using the their new Codex system which is fast becoming effective International Law to all member countirew which already incuded 99% of the world's population,  ethnicand religeuos cleansings, genocide etc.... 
The general principles of the New World Order is that is a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world's wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world's population by 5.5 Billion people.
While the name New World Order is a term frequently used today when referring to this group, it's more useful to identify the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.
The Illuminati is the oldest term commonly used to refer to the 13 family bloodlines (and their offshoots) that make up a major portion of this controlling elite (also known as the black nobility). The black nobility are wealthy European families that have ruled vast financial empires for the past fifteen hundred years. 'They are called the 'Black' nobility because of their constant use of dirty tricks, terrorism and unethical methods which they never hesitate to use against anyone who would dare to
stand in their way. These people are very closely allied to the "German Marshall Fund" which organizes and finances most of the work of the Club of Rome.
Most members of the Illuminati are also members in the highest ranks of numerous secretive and occult societies which in many cases extend straight back into the ancient world. The upper levels of the tightly compartmentalized (need-to-know-basis) Illuminati structural pyramid include planning committees and organizations that the public has little or no knowledge of. The upper levels of the
Illuminati pyramid include secretive committees with names such as: the Council of 3, the Council of 5, the Council of 7, the Council of 9, the Council of 13, the Council of 33, the Grand Druid Council, the Committee of 300 (also called the "Olympians") and the Committee of 500 among others. In 1992, Dr John Coleman published Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300.
Kissinger also mounted the floor of the New York Stock Exchange and told CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” hosts Mark Haines and Erin Burnett that in essence

Obama would be the man tapped to realize the one-world slave labor and control grid.
Obama’s “task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.” Obama was selected by the global elite Kissinger so faithfully serves to push the New World Orderm scheme. Kissinger’s primary goal is to shill for world government. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group. Kissinger is merely informing us of the plan his masters have had in mind now for more than sixty years. Obama will be the front man the globalists will use to usher in the New World Order, a phrase coined by H.G. Wells when he used it as the title of a book about a socialist one-world government future. “Kissinger’s ties to government and international powers – as well as his use of the phrase – have made him suspect in the eyes of many who are wary of what ‘new world order’ might actually mean.”
Kissinger also related that he has been struck by how much the move toward a new global order has been enhanced by the recent crises.
“The jihadist crisis is bringing it home to everybody, that international affairs cannot be conducted entirely by drawing borders and defining international politics by who crosses what borders with organized military force This has now been reinforced by the financial crisis, which totally unexpectedly has spread around the world. It limits the resources that each country has for a foreign policy geared to an assertion of its own pure interests.” 
Kissinger claimed that the key players in international politics, India, China, Russia, America, Europe, should recognize they have parallel concerns and work together to forge what he termed an “age of compatible interests”.

“I’m not saying that leaders will be up to all the opportunities that I may perceive but I think they can start moving in that direction and I’m actually fairly hopeful that we will be moving in that direction.”
According to Kissinger, the rapidly unfolding economic depression and accompanying misery for billions of people “generates a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy” to usher in “a world financial order” and force sovereign nations “to face the reality that its dilemmas can be mastered only by common action,” that is to say through world government and a New World Order.
Obama the new US President is the answer Kissinger writes, "The extraordinary impact of the president elect on the imagination of humanity is an important element in shaping a new world order.” 
Kissinger also mounted the floor of the New York Stock Exchange and told CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” hosts Mark Haines and Erin Burnett that in essence Obama would be the man tapped to realize the one-world slave labor and control grid. Obama’s “task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.”
Obama was selected by the global elite Kissinger so faithfully serves to push the New World Orderm scheme. Kissinger’s primary goal is to shill for world government. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group. Kissinger is merely informing us of the plan his masters have had in mind now for more than sixty years. Obama will be the front man the globalists will use to usher in the New World Order, a phrase coined by H.G. Wells when he used it as the title of a book about a socialist one-world government future. “Kissinger’s ties to government and international powers – as well as his use of the phrase – have made him suspect in the eyes of many who are wary of what ‘new world order’ might actually mean.”
Dale showed that this practice of the occult by royalty is very much part of the mythos purveyed by the would-be inhabitants of Mount Olympus. He cited the view of one practitioner of spiritualism, the late King Paul of Greece, the uncle of Prince Philip, that spiritualism is a positive practice, in the tradition of "the famed Delphic Oracle of Greece." The ultimate point then becomes that Prince Charles is only the latest, in a long and noble (literally) tradition. According to Dale The tribe of Dan
had the snake and the eagle as its two logos and left its calling card all over Europe as it migrated west in the names of many places. The tribe of Dan ruled the Greeks, the Roman Empire, the Austro- Hungarian empire and many others which used the eagle as its logo.
Many Bible prophecy preachers today are quite certain that the Beast of Revelation 13 represents the rising European Union or Mediterranean Union, which is quickly coalescing from an economic partnership into a true political empire of nations, a process that has been greatly facilitated by the events of the September 11th terrorist strikes in New York.
Many see in this union a revitalization of the old Holy Roman Empire, held together in the Middle Ages by the Roman Catholic Church, as well as other Vatican-approved monarchs. Most of these monarchs, as well as their supreme head, the Holy Roman Emperor himself, came from royal houses descending from the family that first held the title “New Constantine”, a prototype of the Holy Roman Emperor title. That family was the Frankish line of the Merovingians, a line that most modern European royals, as well as all 44 of the U.S. presidents, are descendants of. As seen previously, the Merovingians, including their modern-day descendants, consider themselves to be inheritors of the blood lineage of Jesus Christ himself, through his consort, Mary Magdalene.
As the story goes, Christ survived the crucifixion, and fled with his pregnant wife to the Jew-friendly area of Southern France, where a substantial number of his kinsmen were already settled. There his descendants intermarried with local Visigothic nobility, giving birth to the royal line that would provide Europe with all of its subsequent monarchs, as well as the heads of the Holy Roman Empire.
That makes these people not only descendants of Christ, but also of the Judaic King David. Indeed, the royalty of Europe mimic the royalty of ancient Israel in form, symbol and ceremony very closely, cherishing their Davidic heritage as the source of their “Right” to rule. For the throne of David was installed by God himself, who decreed that the office would be passed down to David’s descendants until the end of time. As the Bible states,
“The scepter shall not depart from Judah… until Shiloh come.” (Genesis 49:10.)
Perhaps this is why Anglo-European culture, presumed by most to be made up of Gentiles with pagan ancestry, is the world”s main proponent and bastion of Judeo-Christian theology. In fact, many, such as Herbert W. Armstrong of the Worldwide Church of God, believe that it is not just our political leaders, but the majority of our population that carries the blood of the Israelites. Armstrong maintains that the ten “lost tribes of Israel” in fact can be found today scattered across Europe, Britain, and the former colonies like the US, Canada, and Australia. He makes a case by analyzing words and place-names found throughout Europe that appear to be based in Hebrew. 329,,330 He argues that the word “brit” comes from “berith”, the Hebrew word for “covenant”, and that the word “Saxons” (as in “Anglo-Saxons”) comes from “Isaac”s Son’s.” He also points out a number of locations throughout Europe and especially Ireland could have been named after the tribe of Dan, such as “Dundalk”, “Dundee, “Donegal”, and of course, “Denmark”, meaning “Dan”s Mark.” He even examines historical Irish legends stating that sometime prior to 700 B.C., a tribe called the “Tuatha de Danaan”(Tribe of Dan) arrived on the coast of Ireland and settled down, driving out other tribes along the way, and later becoming fixed in Irish legend as a fantastical race of giants.He then recounts a rather significant Irish folk tale regarding a supposed visit by the Prophet Jeremiah in 569 B.C. In that year “an elderly, white-haired patriarch”, whom the locals referred to as a “saint” came to Ireland with a young woman named “Tea-Telphi”, who was the daughter of an
Egyptian king, and her husband, “Simon Brach.” Simon was the son of the King of Ireland, and the two had met in Jerusalem shortly before that city was sieged. They then went back to Ireland, along with Jeremiah, bearing a harp, an ark, and something called the “Lia-fail”, which later became known as the “Stone of Destiny”, the stone upon which all British monarchs must sit at their coronation. This is the same one that the Brits believe to be synonymous with Jacob’s fabled pillow-stone, upon which he slept as he dreamt about wrestling with an angel. Armstrong finds significance in the fact that the word “lia-fail” reads the same forwards and backwards, perhaps an indication of its Hebraic origin.
It is the tribe of Dan that is named the Church Father, Iraeneus, as being the tribe from which the Antichrist will spring. For one thing, Dan is the only tribe not mentioned in Revelation as having been “sealed” on their foreheads as “Children of God.” One must assume, then, that the Danites are “sealed” with that other mark, the number of the Beast, 666. Furthermore, as J.R. Church writes in Guardians of the Grail” “Four symbols are used in the Bible regarding the Danites – a serpent, an eagle, a lion, and the bees.”48 The first three are symbols now commonly used in European heraldry by Merovingian descendants, the serpent often being depicted as a dragon. The bees, however, are a symbol quite specific to the Merovingian dynasty. Church
continues: “The Merovingians, who plan to rule the world from their future throne at Jerusalem, claim to come from the tribe of Judah through Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene. However, the weight of evidence indicates that they descended from the tribe of Dan. Although Scripture states that Samson was ‘of the family of the Danites’ [Judges 13:2], Yair Davidy of Brit-Am Israel claims that his lineage includes the Messianic tribe of Judah: ‘Samson the superman hero came from the Tribe of Dan but his mother was from Judah. Samson, in some respects, was considered a forerunner of the Messiah who will come from Judah but his mother, according to the Midrash will be of the Tribe of Dan. Again this view shares a common denominator with that of the early church fathers Irenaeus and Hippolytus who also believed that the Antichrist would come from the lineage of Dan. The train of who ascribe credibility to the “Tribe of Dan theory” and to the Jewish identity of the future Antichrist, cannot be surpassed by the elaborate renditions of Arthur W. Pink, who, interestingly enough is a bit tepid relative to Dan’s connection to a Jewish Antichrist: “But if this pseudo Christ succeeds in palming himself off on the Jews as their true Messiah he must be a Jew, for it is unthinkable that they would be deceived by any Gentile . . . it was the common belief among Christians during the first four centuries A.D., that the Antichrist would come from the tribe of Dan. Whether this will be the case or no, we do not know. 
Gen. 49:17,18 may have ultimate reference to this Son of Perdition. Certainly Dan is the most mysterious of all the twelve tribes.”

3. Exact of  INLNews report PART III: UNDERSTANDING THE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGENDA  THE NEW WORLD ORDER:ORCHESTRATED BY THE ORDER OF THE ILLUMINATI
A MASONIC BLUEPRINT TO LAUNCH THE WORLD ORDER THROUGH WAR
5. CONTROL OF JERUSALEM AND KING SOLOMONS TEMPLE


4. Mother of All mind control organizations:  The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London.
The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations involved in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most astute among us. Most people react with disbelief and scepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have been conditioned (brainwashed) to react with scepticism by institutional and media influences that were created by the Mother of All mind control organizations: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. Author and de-programmer Fritz Springmeier says that most people have built in "slides" that short circuit the mind's critical examination process when it comes to certain sensitive topics. "Slides", Springmeier reports, is a CIA term for a conditioned type of response which dead ends a person's thinking and terminates debate or examination of the topic at hand. For example, the mention of the word "conspiracy" often solicits a slide response with many people. Springmeier has co-authored three books on trauma-based programming which detail how the Illuminati employs highly tuned and extremely sophisticated Mind Control (MC) training programs that begin the programming process
while the intended victim is still within the womb. Mind Control is a much greater problem than most people realize.
What most Americans believe to be "Public Opinion" is in reality carefully crafted and scripted propaganda designed to elicit a desired behavioral response from the public. Public opinion polls are really taken with the intent of gauging the public's acceptance of the Illuminati's planned programs. A strong showing in the polls tells the Illuminati that the programing is "taking", while a poor showing tells the NWO manipulators that they have to recast or "tweak" the programming until the desired response is achieved. While the thrust and content of the propaganda is decided at Tavistock, implementation of the propaganda is executed in the United States by well over 200 'think tanks' such as the Rand Corporation and the Brookings Institute which are overseen and directed by the top NWO mind control organization in the United States, the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California.
The general principles of the New World Order is that is a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world's wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world's population by 5.5 Billion people.
While the name New World Order is a term frequently used today when referring to this group, it's more useful to identify the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.
The Illuminati is the oldest term commonly used to refer to the 13 family bloodlines (and their offshoots) that make up a major portion of this controlling elite (also known as the black nobility). The black nobility are wealthy European families that have ruled vast financial empires for the past fifteen hundred years. 'They are called the 'Black' nobility because of their constant use of dirty tricks, terrorism and unethical methods which they never hesitate to use against anyone who would dare to
stand in their way. These people are very closely allied to the "German Marshall Fund" which organizes and finances most of the work of the Club of Rome.
Most members of the Illuminati are also members in the highest ranks of numerous secretive and occult societies which in many cases extend straight back into the ancient world. The upper levels of the tightly compartmentalized (need-to-know-basis) Illuminati structural pyramid include planning committees and organizations that the public has little or no knowledge of. The upper levels of the Illuminati pyramid include secretive committees with names such as: the Council of 3, the Council of 5, the Council of 7, the Council of 9, the Council of 13, the Council of 33, the Grand Druid Council, the Committee of 300 (also called the "Olympians") and the Committee of 500 among others. In 1992, Dr John Coleman published Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300.
With laudable scholarship and meticulous research, Dr Coleman identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control. On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr Coleman accurately summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 as follows: 
"A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population. There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited." 
The image below shows that the power structure of the New World Order is based on an incredible network of masonic groups and secret societies which encompasses banking and finance, politics, education and the environment and religion.
The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations involved in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most astute among us. Most people reactwith disbelief and scepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have been conditioned (brainwashed) to react with scepticism by institutional and media influences that were created by the Mother of All mind control organizations: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London.
Author and de-programmer Fritz Springmeier says that most people have built in "slides" that short circuit the mind's critical examination process when it comes to certain sensitive topics. "Slides", Springmeier reports, is a CIA term for a conditioned type of response which dead ends a person's thinking and terminates debate or examination of the topic at hand. For example, the mention of the word "conspiracy" often solicits a slide response with many people. Springmeier has co-authored
three books on trauma-based programming which detail how the Illuminati employs highly tuned and extremely sophisticated Mind Control (MC) training programs that begin the programming process while the intended victim is still within the womb. Mind Control is a much greater problem than most people realize.
What most Americans believe to be "Public Opinion" is in reality carefully crafted and scripted propaganda designed to elicit a desired behavioral response from the public. Public opinion polls are really taken with the intent of gauging the public's acceptance of the Illuminati's planned programs. A strong showing in the polls tells the Illuminati that the programing is "taking", while a poor showing tells the NWO manipulators that they have to recast or "tweak" the programming until the desired response is achieved. While the thrust and content of the propaganda is decided at Tavistock, implementation of the propaganda is executed in the United States by well over 200 'think tanks' such as the Rand Corporation and the Brookings Institute which are overseen and directed by the top NWO mind control organization in the United States, the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo
Park, California.

5. A MASONIC BLUEPRINT TO LAUNCH THE WORLD ORDER THROUGH WAR

6. One of the problems facing bible prophecy today is modern surface level bible prophecy research that does not properly distinguish the fact that the Zionism concept has a deep sinister and demonic core to its true essence. Many bible prophecy evangelists such as John Hagee have done much to popularize the belief that by standing for Israel and a Zionist state that this provides you with favor in the eyes of God and fulfils the required obligation to support Israel as prophesied. Many end time
prophecy insights make reference to the special relationship between the United States, Britain and Israel and the fact that there is an inherent spiritual obligation of the so called Christian nations to support the Jewish people. Reference is given to the need to help the Jews rebuild their temple as this is a significant requirement not only in the end time calendar but also because such a temple would become a major icon within the Millennial reign of Christ on earth.
However the truth is that by a more in-depth and deeper understanding of global government policies uncovers definitive proof of a Jewish Masonic elitist goal to establish dictatorial Illuministic Communism and to enslave all of mankind under the thumb of a Jewish master race led by a world messiah of Jewish ancestry who is to rule from Jerusalem. This is not an anti-semetic stance but rather one that differentiates between Godly Jews from the line of Abraham and those Jews whose
apostasy has caused them to be an integral part of a major demonic plan.
The New World Order plan is historically known to have begun its implementation with Albert Pike in his monumental Freemasonry teaching guide entitled, "Morals And Dogma of the Ancient And Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry".113 Pike was the Grand Commander of North American Freemasonry from 1859-1891 and was an extremely gifted intellectual.
• He was a certified genius
• He spoke 16 languages fluently
• He graduated from Harvard University
• He achieved rank of Brigadier General of Confederate Army in Civil War
• He was thoroughly familiar with the Jewish occult system known ad the Cabala
During his tenure, Pike caught a global vision of what Freemasonry could achieve, and so he turned his immense intellect toward achieving this vision. Consequently, he received a demonic vision, described below. On January 22, 1870, Pike and one of his international co-conspirators, Guiseppe Mazzini, published the Plan which would establish the New World Order. This Plan was kept very secret, only within Freemasonry circles since the time of its inception, known only to fellow occult Illuminist conspirators. 
The secret Pike plan to control the world foresaw the need for three world wars. Note the date of this prediction: January 22, 1870. This date is 44 years before the beginning of World War I. Once you understand the facts we are about to share with you and realize the length of time between this prediction and the beginning of its fulfillment, you can understand how supernatural forces were truly in command.
The Masonic plan to overthrow the Judeo-Christian-Islamic Old World Order, and establish the Satanic New World Order foresaw the need for war. However, this war was not the type of warfare the world had seen historically. This war was to be on a much larger scale than history had ever recorded. This war was to be global, or world-wide.
The details of this Pike Plan {January 22, 1870} for three World Wars to establish the New World Order is as follows: (As you are reading this demonic prophecy, remember the occult concept of Thesis battling Antithesis to produce the new system, Synthesis. World Wars I & II were fought to establish Antithesis, to set up the Cold War, that "controlled conflict or threat of conflict" that would produce the new system, Synthesis).
I. The First World War was designed to enable the Czarist Government in Russia to be finally and completely overthrown. The new Russian government was foreseen to be atheistic and militaristic. Further, Pike specified that this new Russian Government was to be Communistic. Karl Marx had published his Communist Manifesto in 1848, exactly 22 years before this occultic prophecy through Albert Pike. Isn't it interesting that the occultic number 22 keeps popping up? The multiplier numbers, 44 and 66 also keep appearing, as you will see in a few moments. History records that this First World War did, indeed, occur just as listed, above. The Western powers in Europe, in
conjunction with the United States, financed Lenin's expedition into Russia, they financed his government consistently, and we have financed Russian Communism at least once per decade since then.
II. The Second World War was foreseen to originate between Great Britain and Germany. However, one of the planned results of this war was to strengthen the new Communist Russian government, so that it could weaken and destroy other governments and religions. History again records that the Second World War did, indeed, accomplish this objective. The war started when Germany invaded Poland, causing Great Britain to declare war on Germany. Very soon, the troika (3's) of powers were
set up to wage this war. The Black Magic occultists allied themselves when Germany linked with Italy and Japan; the White Magic occultists allied themselves together as Great Britain linked with the United States and Russia. Do not be deceived.
This war was fought between two New World Order forces, the "evil" alliance of the Axis Powers or the "good" alliance of the Allied Powers; the war was between the Black Magic forces against the White Magic forces. But, we shall return to this subject in more depth at a later time. Certainly, the Pike vision of the Second World War building Russian Communism into a super power was fulfilled to a startling degree. Historians have always been mystified as to how Churchill and Roosevelt could have given away all of Eastern Europe to the Soviets, when the preponderance of power was clearly against the Soviets. Clearly, when Roosevelt and Churchill ceded all of Eastern Europe to Russia, the Communist Government of Russia, now known as the U.S.S.R. {Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) completed its transition to a super power, exactly as Pike's vision had foretold. And, let us not forget that the Second World War had given Russia capabilities it had not possessed before the War. Not only did we build up the Russian military to a frightful degree, but we had also built entire factories East of Moscow that gave Russia an instant manufacturing base. Even though Russia had paid dearly in human lives during the War, they came out of the conflict a superpower. Thanks to Roosevelt, Russia now had a kingdom to go along with its new military and industrial base.
III. The Third World War was foreseen to be between Judaism and Islam. This prophecy is incredible in many ways, beginning with the understanding that this prophecy of a third world war occurred in 1870, a time when Israel did not exist as a nation, and when no one except Fundamentalist, Bible-believing Christians believed it would ever exist again. The demonic 'guiding spirits' of Freemasonry, and of the leaders of the New World Order Plan, are planning a final, definitive Third World War, which will begin between Israel and her Arab neighbors and spread to the entire world. Now, here is the most interesting aspect of this demonic plan; it fits with Scripture!! God foretold
Last Day's Judgment on the Arabs in several places, listed below!
In Obadiah, God foretells the destruction of the House of Esau, particularly the people of Edom, in the Last Days. God is promising this deliverance for the way in which these Arabs treated His chosen People. While severe judgment did fall upon the nation of Edom in 70 A.D., they were not wiped out
as a people, nor was the destruction at the hands of Israel, as Verse 18 foretells, nor was it the fulfillment of the final days' judgment, which the Bible consistently labels the "Day Of The Lord"
{Verse 15}
Joel 2:18-3:21, God foretells tremendous judgment of all nations in the world, starting with the Arabs, beginning when God "reverses the captivity" and "restores the fortunes" of Israel, a date we know as May 14, 1948. Read this passage carefully, and you will see the hand of God foretelling judgment swirling all around Israel after she is restored to her land. Joel 2:30-31 seem to foretell nuclear war at this time.
While Israel will escape physical destruction by the miraculous power of God, she will be in so much danger that God Himself will supernaturally protect her. In Daniel 12:1, we see that, in the time of the End, Israel will be in such danger that "Michael shall arise to defend your [Daniel's] people [Israel]."
Therefore, we can place great emphasis and credibility in this demonic vision of the Third World War. Out of the smoke and destruction of this War, Antichrist will stride triumphantly, to put an end to the War, to finally give the embattled world "Peace and Safety". But, as 1 Thessalonians 5:1-4 foretells,
when people are saying this, the world will explode in destruction. The current events in Israel, where she is giving up "land for peace" makes no sense any other way.
Israel's leaders, some of whom are former generals in the Army, have lent their support to this idiotic plan. Militarily, this plan is a disaster, for it allows the Arabs a permanent home so deep within Israel that the military might not be able to successfully defend Israel if the attack comes from within the
Palestinian State.
The Jewish Orthodox community is overwhelmingly of the opinion that this "Peace Plan" is a recipe for war, not peace. They are right; that is the plan. Why, you ask, are so many Israeli leaders, who should know better, creating and supporting this plan of giving the Palestinians a state, and giving up the Golan Heights? There are three reasons:
1. They are Humanists, and therefore, are capable of being deceived by Satan
2. They have been given "concrete" assurances by the Western Powers that their security will be "guaranteed" if they agree to this plan.
3. Many of them are Freemasons and follow the Talmud and Jewish Cabala Isaiah alludes to these covenants by the leaders of Israel as covenants with death. In Isaiah 28:18 “And your covenant with death shall be disannulled., and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the
overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.”

5. CONTROL OF JERUSALEM AND KING SOLOMONS TEMPLE
In the classic treatise of the Masons, “Morals and Dogma”, authored by the late Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite, Albert Pike, 113 we discover the revelation that the Jewish cabala is the very basis of Masonic practice and ritual and that the cabalistic "Theology of the Sephiroth" is at the root of all Masonic knowledge. This, admits Pike, is "high magic," the "Sacerdotal Art," and the "Royal Art.  In “Morals and Dogma” Albert Pike also details a specific Masonic agenda to blow up and to utterly destroy and remove from the Temple mount both the Islamic Mosque of Omar and the Goldendomed structure known as the "Dome of the Rock" despised by Orthodox Jewish rabbis and the secularist Masonic Illuminists alike. It is planned that these two Islamic religious edifices will be brought down by Israeli defense forces possibly by missiles, sapper bombs, laser bursts, or other means. Naturally, this atrocity will be planned in the chaotic midst of an ongoing war, and the disaster will be scandalously blamed on the Arabs. It will be said that an errant Arab missile or bomb is responsible. The end goal is to clear the Dome of the Rock and make space for the establishment of Solomon’s Temple. "Of all the objects which constitute the Masonic science of symbolism, the most important, the most cherished, by the Mason, and by far the most significant, is the Temple of Jerusalem. The spiritualizing of the Temple is the first, the most prominent and the most pervading, of all symbols of Freemasonry ... Take from Freemasonry its dependence on the Temple; leave out of its ritual all references to that sacred edifice, and to the legends and traditions connected with it,
and the system itself would at once decay and die ... " 
Therefore, the first understanding to grasp is that Freemasonry is absolutely, completely, 100% devoted to the Solomon Temple, without which the entire structure and foundation of Freemasonry would die! Thus does Masonry stand in stark contrast to genuine, Biblical Christianity. In other words, Freemasonry is rooted at its deepest foundation to the First Covenant of the Old Testament, while Biblical Christianity is rooted to the Second Covenant of Jesus Christ as delineated in the New
Testament. In the Masonic Bible, the author of the Foreword sheds some further light upon the importance of Solomon's Temple to Freemasonry. "The traditions and romance of King Solomon's Temple are of great interest to everyone who reads the Bible. They are of transcendent importance to Masons. The Temple is the outstanding symbol in Masonry, and the legendary story of the building of the Temple is the fundamental basis of the Masonic rule and guide for conduct in life ... The cream of Masonic historical and philosophical writing has been drawn upon for his description of the Temple and its relation to Masonic ritual." 
Then shall come a prophesied Masonic Temple of All Religions to be built on the very spot from where the debris and ashes of the Moslem structures will be bulldozed off and cleared. Through its golden portals shall pass the New Zionist Messiah, King of Planet Earth. Before its evil altar he shall announce to all the world, via television, that their Universal Savior has finally come, a man knowledgeable of "the Holy Kabbalah, the exclusive heritage of the people of Israel.”
The pretext for the First Crusade—recovery of the Temple treasures and sacred sites—concealed the real motive of the Merovingians, which was to rebuild the ancient Temple of Solomon. In the Chapter
“Knight Kadosh” of Morals and Dogma, Albert Pike wrote of the Crusader Knights of the Temple:
"In 1118, nine Knights Crusaders in the East, among whom were Geoffroi de Saint-Omer and Hugues de Payens, consecrated themselves to religion, and took an oath between the hands of the Patriarch of Constantinople, a See always secretly or openly hostile to that of Rome from the time of Photius. The avowed objective of the Templars was to protect the Christians who came to visit the Holy Places: their secret object was the re-building of the Temple of Solomon on the model prophesied by Ezekiel.” 
“This re-building, formally predicted by the Judaizing Mystics of the earlier ages, had become the secret dream of the Patriarchs of the Orient. The Temple of Solomon, re-built and consecrated to the Catholic worship would become, in effect, the Metropolis of the Universe; the East would prevail over the West, and the Patriarchs of Constantinople would possess themselves of the Papal power.”  “The Templars, or Poor Fellow-Soldiery of the Holy House of the Temple intended to be rebuilt, took as their models, in the Bible, the Warrior-Masons of Zorobabel, who worked, holding the sword in one hand and the trowel in the other.
Therefore it was that the Sword and the Trowell were the insignia of the Templars, who subsequently, as will be seen, concealed themselves under the name of Brethren Masons. [This name, Freres Macons in the French, adopted by way of secret reference to the Builders of the Second Temple, was corrupted in English into Free-Masons, as Pythagore de Crotone was into Peter Gower of Groton in England. Khairum or Khur-um, (a name mis-rendered into Hiram) from an artificer in brass and other metals, became the Chief Builder of the Haikal Kadosh, the Holy House, of the Temple,... and the words Bonai and Banaim yet appear in the Masonic Degrees, meaning Builder and Builders.)” 
"The trowel of the Templars is quadruple, and the triangular plates of it are arranged in the form of a cross, making the Kabalistic pantacle known by the name of the Cross of the East. The Knight of the East, and the Knight of the East and West, have in their titles secret allusions of whom they were at first the successors." 113
The rise of Masons to political power in Israel dates back to 1948 and to Israel's founding as a modern-day nation. David Ben-Gurion, its first Prime Minister, was both a Mason and an avowed Marxist-Leninist and Communist. Since that time, every single Prime Minister has been a high-level Mason, including Golda Meier, who was a member of the women's organization, the Co-Masons. In The Jerusalem Post (November 1994) was an advertisement placed by "The Grand Lodge of the State of Israel." The display ad was addressed "To the Masons of Peace," and listed: "The Honorable Yitzak Rabin, Prime Minister of Israel," "His Majesty, King Hussein of Jordan," and "The Honorable Bill Clinton, President of the United States."
The ad closed with these fascinating words "With warm fraternal congratulations on the signing of the peace agreement between Israel and
Jordan." Signed - Ephraim Fuchs, President of the Israel Order of Masons."
In 1993 in Jerusalem, a celebration of political Masons was held. According to the respected Italian
newspaper La Republica (October 1993), in an article entitled, "Israel: There is a Pact Between
Politicians and Masons," the ceremony was attended by the Mayor of Jerusalem, Teddy Kollek, as
well as by the Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi, Israel Meier Lau. Kollek told the gathered Masons, "You do a great honor to Jerusalem.” This is natural, considering that King Solomon was the great builder of the temple, which is at the roots of the Masonic idea." At that same ceremony, sponsored by the "Grand Lodge of the State of Israel," Rabbi Lau stated that, "The principles of Freemasonry are all contained in the Book of Books of the Jewish people." Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly stated (see the Israeli publication Shishi, Spring 1994) that he was initiated into the Masonic Lodge while in the United States. The La Republica newspaper stated that Prime Minister Yitzak Rabin was active in Masonry and estimated there are 4,000 Israeli Freemasons, divided into 76 lodges. Most Israeli judges and religious figures are Masons. Rothschild-supported Hebrew University in Israel has erected an Egyptian obelisk, symbol of Freemasonry, in its courtyard, and inside the new Israeli Supreme Court building is a law library architecturally designed in the shape of an Egyptian pyramid.
Once you understand that Middle Eastern events are being driven by this fervent Masonic desire to rebuild Solomon's Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, then you will be able to make sense of what is occurring over there today. To finally realize this dream, control of Jerusalem generally, and of the Temple Mount, especially, must pass from Israeli control; but it must not pass to Arab control.
Rather, control of Jerusalem must pass to the Illuminized International Community. Once you understand this it then changes your whole perception on understanding who the antichrist is. The Masonic "preoccupation" with Jerusalem is pulling all the nations of the world together against Jerusalem. Literally, out of the smoke, devastation, and terror of the planned World War III, The apostate Christ shall come striding, just as Peter Lemesurier indicated in his book, "The Armageddon Script".116 Islam and Arabs need to understand that they are targeted for extinction, as their strongly monotheistic religion is not compatible with the coming world government philosophy of governance.
In the masonic hallmark "Morals and Dogma", Grandmaster Free Mason of the Scottish Rite, Albert Pike defines the New World Order as emerging after an apocalyptic World War III which will see a major clash between the forces of Islam and the Zionist West. It is likely that such a war will be triggered or influenced by an attempt whether successful or unsuccessful to remove the Muslim
Dome of the Rock and the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.
It has long been known that the Jesuit Order has been planning to accomplish a feat through a number of secret covert masonic zionist intelligence agencies such as Mossad. The Jesuit Order is closely integrated with the masonic lodges and both are fully aware that Solomon's Temple could never be built without significant hostility from the Muslim world should the Dome of the Rock still exist whilst trying to build the Jewish third temple only a matter of a few hundred yards away.
Unfortunately many bible prophecy scholars have showed tremendous excitement at seeing any evidence of the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple because this is a significant prophetical requirement to fulfil Daniel 9:27 which indicates that the Levitical priesthood and temple sacrifices will commence.

However many do not realise that there is a parallel objective here and neither do they distinguish between "Torah" following Jews and "Apostate Jews" who follow the Kabbala, Babylonian Talmud and who fulfil Isaiah 28:18.
The rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple ties into the several references that the Bible makes to a future event called the "abomination of desolation" in which it is likely that the conservative Jews (who follow the Torah) will have their role stripped as the masonic apostate Jews and the global elite (who follow the Talmud) will seize full control in which their own world leader dictator and false messiah will be revealed. "...
In all the rich symbolism of Ancient Craft Masonry two symbols, or symbolic themes, predominate. One is the search for light; the other is the labor of building. The source of light is the Holy Bible, and the grand representation of the builder's art is King Solomon's Temple .... It was natural that imaginative stone Masons, long before the development of anything like our modern fraternity, should have felt a kinship with the great builders of all ages. It was natural also that they should have acknowledge a peculiar attraction for the most famous and glorious of all building enterprises, King Solomon's Temple and Citadel. Interest and attraction for the wonderful structure on Mt. Moriah have increased rather than diminished ... until today the Temple of Solomon is the spiritual home of every Mason." [Masonic Holy Bible, Temple Illustrated Edition, A.J. Holman Co., 1968, p. 11-14]Once you understand that Middle Eastern events are being driven by this fervent Masonic desire to rebuild Solomon's Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, then you will be able to make sense of
what is occurring over there today. To finally realize this dream, control of Jerusalem generally, and of the Temple Mount, especially, must pass from Israeli control; but it must not pass to Arab control.
Rather, control of Jerusalem must pass to the Illuminized International Community under the control  of the black nobility families who control the world.

8. Extracts of INL News Report on New World Order - Barrack Obama-
2008 BANKING COLLAPSE ESCALATES WORLD GOVERNMENT FORMATION
UNDERSTANDING THE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGENDA
EMERGENCE OF REGIONAL CURRENCIES
A “NEW WORLD ORDER” IN BANKING

"International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic.” an adviser to French President Nicolas Sarkozy Rachman
In February of 2009, the Times Online reported that a 
“New world order in banking [is] necessary,” and that, 
“It is increasingly evident that the world needs a new banking system and 
that it should not bear much resemblance to the one that has failed so spectacularly.”


 But of course, the ones that are shaping this new banking system  are the champions of the previous banking system.
The solutions that will follow are simply the extensions of the current system, 
only sped up through them necessity posed by the current crisis.
In November of 2008, The National, a prominent United Arab Emirate newspaper, reported on Baron David de Rothschild accompanying Prime Minister Gordon Brown on a visit to the Middle East, although not as a “part of the official party” accompanying Brown. Following an interview with the Baron, it was reported that, “Rothschild shares most people’s view that there is a new world order. In his opinion, banks will deleverage and there will be a new form of global governance.”
In April of 2009, Robert Zoellick, President of the World Bank, said that, “If leaders are serious about
creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernizing multilateralism to
empower the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.” 
David Rothkopf, a scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, former Deputy Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade in the Clinton administration, and former managing director of Kissinger and Associates, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations,
recently wrote a book titled, Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They are Making, of which he is certainly a member. When discussing the role and agenda of the global “superclass”, he states that, “In a world of global movements and threats that don’t present their passports at national borders, it is no longer possible for a nation-state acting alone to fulfill its portion of the social contract.” He writes that, “even the international organizations and alliances we have today, flawed as they are, would have seemed impossible until recently, notably the success of the European Union – a unitary democratic state the size of India. The evolution and achievements of such entities against all odds suggest not isolated instances but an overall trend in the direction of what Tennyson called “the Parliament of Man,” or ‘universal law’.” 
He states that he is “optimistic that progress will continue to be made,” but it will be difficult, because it “undercuts many national and local power structures and cultural concepts that have foundations deep in the bedrock of human civilization, namely the notion of sovereignty.” 
He quoted an adviser to French President Nicolas Sarkozy as saying, “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government,” and that the “core of the international financial crisis is that we have global financial markets and no global rule of law.” However, Rachman states that any push towards a global government “will be a painful, slow process.” He then states that a key problem in this push can be explained with an example from the EU, which “has suffered a series of humiliating defeats in referendums, when plans for “ever closer union” have been referred to the voters. In general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters.

"International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic.” an adviser to French President Nicolas Sarkozy Rachman

A NEW BRETTON-WOODS

In October of 2008, Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of the UK, said that we “must have a new Bretton Woods - building a new international financial architecture for the years ahead.” He continued in saying that, “we must now reform the international financial system around the agreed principles of transparency, integrity, responsibility, good housekeeping and co-operation across borders.” An article in the Telegraph reported that Gordon Brown would want “to see the IMF reformed to become a ‘global central bank’ closely monitoring the international economy and financial system.”
On October 17, 2008, Prime Minister Gordon Brown wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post in which he said, “This week, European leaders came together to propose the guiding principles that we believe should underpin this new Bretton Woods: transparency, sound banking, responsibility, integrity and global governance. We agreed that urgent decisions implementing these principles should be made to root out the irresponsible and often undisclosed lending at the heart of our problems. To do this, we need cross-border supervision of financial institutions; shared globalstandards for accounting and regulation; a more responsible approach to executive remuneration
that rewards hard work, effort and enterprise but not irresponsible risk-taking; and the renewal of our international institutions to make them effective early-warning systems for the world economy.”
In early October 2008, it was reported that, “as the world's central bankers gather this week in Washington DC for an IMF-World Bank conference to discuss the crisis, the big question they face is whether it is time to establish a global economic "policeman" to ensure the crash of 2008 can never be repeated.” Further, “any organization with the power to police the global economy would have to include representatives of every major country – a United Nations of economic regulation.” A former governor of the Bank of England suggested that, “the answer might already be staring us in the face, in the form of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS),” however, “The problem is that it has no teeth. The IMF tends to couch its warnings about economic problems in very diplomatic language, but the BIS is more independent and much better placed to deal with this if it is given the power to do so.”

UNDERSTANDING THE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGENDA A GLOBAL CURRENCY
The Phoenix

In 1988, The Economist ran an article titled, Get Ready for the Phoenix, in which they wrote, “THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be
quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let's say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today's national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the late twentieth century.”
The article stated that, “The market crash [of 1987] taught [governments] that the pretence of policy cooperation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (ie, until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.” Amazingly the article states that, “Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stockmarket crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face
squarely up to that choice. This points to a muddled sequence of emergency followed by patch-up followed by emergency, stretching out far beyond 2018-except for two things. As time passes, the damage caused by currency instability is gradually going to mount; and the very trends that will make it mount are making the utopia of monetary union feasible.”
Further, the article stated that, “The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate-and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate-would be in its charge.
Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit.” The author admits that, “This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.”
The article concludes in stating that, “The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.” The last sentence states, “Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.”

A “NEW WORLD ORDER” IN BANKING
In March of 2008, following the collapse of Bear Stearns, Reuters reported on a document released by research firm CreditSights, which said that, “Financial firms face a ‘new world order’,” and that, “More industry consolidation and acquisitions may follow after JPMorgan Chase & Co.” Further, “In the event of future consolidation, potential acquirers identified by CreditSights include JPMorganChase, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America.” In June of 2008, before he was Treasury Secretary in the Obama administration, Timothy Geithner, as head of the New York Federal Reserve, wrote an article for the Financial Times following his attendance at the 2008 Bilderberg conference, in which he wrote that, “Banks and investment banks whose health is crucial to the global financial system should operate under a unified regulatory framework,” and he said that, “the US Federal Reserve should play a "central role" in the new regulatory framework, working closely with supervisors in the US and around the world.”
 In November of 2008, The National, a prominent United Arab Emirate newspaper, reported on Baron David de Rothschild accompanying Prime Minister Gordon Brown on a visit to the Middle East, although not as a “part of the official party” accompanying Brown. Following an interview with the Baron, it was reported that, “Rothschild shares most people’s view that there is a new world order. In his opinion, banks will deleverage and there will be a new form of global governance.”
In February of 2009, the Times Online reported that a “New world order in banking [is] necessary,” and that, “It is increasingly evident that the world needs a new banking system and that it should not bear much resemblance to the one that has failed so spectacularly.” 306 But of course, the ones that are shaping this new banking system are the champions of the previous banking system. The solutions that will follow are simply the extensions of the current system, only sped up through the necessity posed by the current crisis.

AN EMERGING GLOBAL GOVERNMENT
A recent article in the Financial Post stated that, “The danger in the present course is that if the world moves to a “super sovereign” reserve currency engineered by experts, such as the “UN Commission of Experts” led by Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz, we would give up the possibility of a spontaneous money order and financial harmony for a centrally planned order and the politicization of money. Such a regime change would endanger not only the future value of money but, more
importantly, our freedom and prosperity.”  Further, “An uncomfortable characteristic of the new world order may well turn out to be that global income gaps will widen because the rising powers, such as China, India and Brazil, regard those below them on the ladder as potential rivals.” The author further states that, “The new world order thus won't necessarily be any better than the old one,” and that, “What is certain, though, is that global affairs are going to be considerably different from now on.” 
In April of 2009, Robert Zoellick, President of the World Bank, said that, “If leaders are serious about creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernizing multilateralism to empower the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.”  David Rothkopf, a scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, former Deputy Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade in the Clinton administration, and former managing director of Kissinger and Associates, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, recently wrote a book titled, Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They are Making, of
which he is certainly a member. When discussing the role and agenda of the global “superclass”, he states that, “In a world of global movements and threats that don’t present their passports at national borders, it is no longer possible for a nation-state acting alone to fulfill its portion of the social contract.” He writes that, “even the international organizations and alliances we have today, flawed as they are, would have seemed impossible until recently, notably the success of the European Union – a unitary democratic state the size of India. The evolution and achievements of such entities against all odds suggest not isolated instances but an overall trend in the direction of what Tennyson called “the Parliament of Man,” or ‘universal law’.” He states that he is “optimistic that progress will continue to be made,” but it will be difficult, because it “undercuts many national and local power structures and cultural concepts that have foundations deep in the bedrock of human civilization, namely the notion of sovereignty.”
Following the 2009 G20 summit, plans were announced for implementing the creation of a new global currency to replace the US dollar’s role as the world reserve currency. Point 19 of the communiqué released by the G20 at the end of the Summit stated, “We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity.” SDRs, or Special Drawing Rights, are “a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund.” As the Telegraph reported, “the G20 leaders have activated the IMF's power to create money and begin global "quantitative easing". In doing so, they are putting a de facto world
currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.” 
The article continued in stating that, “There is now a world currency in waiting. In time, SDRs are likely to evolve into a parking place for the foreign holdings of central banks, led by the People's Bank of China.” Further, “The creation of a Financial Stability Board looks like the first step towards a global financial regulator,” or, in other words, a global central bank.
It is important to take a closer look at these “solutions” being proposed and implemented in the midst of the current global financial crisis. These are not new suggestions, as they have been in the plans of the global elite for a long time. However, in the midst of the current crisis, the elite have fasttracked their agenda of forging a New World Order in finance. It is important to address the background to these proposed and imposed “solutions” and what effects they will have on the International Monetary System (IMS) and the global political economy as a whole.
A NEW BRETTON-WOODS
In October of 2008, Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of the UK, said that we “must have a new Bretton Woods - building a new international financial architecture for the years ahead.” He continued in saying that, “we must now reform the international financial system around the agreed principles of
transparency, integrity, responsibility, good housekeeping and co-operation across borders.” An article in the Telegraph reported that Gordon Brown would want “to see the IMF reformed to become a ‘global central bank’ closely monitoring the international economy and financial system.”  On October 17, 2008, Prime Minister Gordon Brown wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post in which he said, “This week, European leaders came together to propose the guiding principles that we believe should underpin this new Bretton Woods: transparency, sound banking, responsibility, integrity and global governance. We agreed that urgent decisions implementing these principles
should be made to root out the irresponsible and often undisclosed lending at the heart of our problems. To do this, we need cross-border supervision of financial institutions; shared global standards for accounting and regulation; a more responsible approach to executive remuneration that rewards hard work, effort and enterprise but not irresponsible risk-taking; and the renewal of our international institutions to make them effective early-warning systems for the world economy.”
In early October 2008, it was reported that, “as the world's central bankers gather this week in Washington DC for an IMF-World Bank conference to discuss the crisis, the big question they face is whether it is time to establish a global economic "policeman" to ensure the crash of 2008 can never
be repeated.” Further, “any organization with the power to police the global economy would have to include representatives of every major country – a United Nations of economic regulation.”
A former governor of the Bank of England suggested that, “the answer might already be staring us in the face, in the form of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS),” however, “The problem is that it has no teeth. The IMF tends to couch its warnings about economic problems in very diplomatic
language, but the BIS is more independent and much better placed to deal with this if it is given the
power to do so.” 
On January 1, 1999, the European Union established the Euro as its regional currency. The Euro has grown in prominence over the past several years. However, it is not to be the only regional currency in the world. There are moves and calls for other regional currencies throughout the world. In 2007, Foreign Affairs, the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations, ran an article titled, The End of National Currency, in which it began by discussing the volatility of international currency markets,
and that very few “real” solutions have been proposed to address successive currency crises. The author poses the question, “will restoring lost sovereignty to governments put an end to financial instability?” He answers by stating that, “This is a dangerous misdiagnosis,” and that, “The right course is not to return to a mythical past of monetary sovereignty, with governments controlling local interest and exchange rates in blissful ignorance of the rest of the world. Governments must let go of
the fatal notion that nationhood requires them to make and control the money used in their territory. National currencies and global markets simply do not mix; together they make a deadly brew of currency crises and geopolitical tension and create ready pretexts for damaging protectionism. In order to globalize safely, countries should abandon monetary nationalism and abolish unwanted currencies, the source of much of today's instability.”
The author explains that, “Monetary nationalism is simply incompatible with globalization. It has always been, even if this has only become apparent since the 1970s, when all the world's governments rendered their currencies intrinsically worthless.” The author states that, “Since economic development outside the process of globalization is no longer possible, countries should abandon monetary nationalism. Governments should replace national currencies with the dollar or the euro or, in the case of Asia, collaborate to produce a new multinational currency over a comparably large and economically diversified area.” Essentially, according to the author, the solution lies in regional currencies.
In October of 2008, “European Central Bank council member Ewald Nowotny said a ``tri-polar'' global currency system is developing between Asia, Europe and the U.S. and that he's skeptical the U.S. dollar's centrality can be revived.” 
The Union of South American Nations
The Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) was established on May 23, 2008, with the headquarters to be in Ecuador, the South American Parliament to be in Bolivia, and the Bank of the South to be in Venezuela. As the BBC reported, “The leaders of 12 South American nations have formed a regional body aimed at boosting economic and political integration in the region,” and that, “The Unasur members are Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay,
Peru, Suriname, Uruguay and Venezuela.”  The week following the announcement of the Union, it was reported that, “Brazilian President Luiz
Inacio Lula da Silva said Monday that South American nations will seek a common currency as part of the region's integration efforts following the creation of the Union of South American Nations.” He was quoted as saying, “We are proceeding so as, in the future, we have a common central bank and a common currency.” 
The Gulf Cooperation Council and a Regional Currency In 2005, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), a regional trade bloc among Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), announced the goal of creating a single common currency by 2010. It was reported that, “An economically united and efficient GCC is clearly a more interesting proposition for larger companies than each individual economy, especially given the impediments to trade evident within the region. This is why trade relations within the GCC have been a core focus of late.” Further, “The natural extension of this trend for increased integration is to
introduce a common currency in order to further facilitate trade between the different countries.” It was announced that, “the region's central bankers had agreed to pursue monetary union in a similar fashion to the rules used in Europe.” 
In June of 2008, it was reported that, “Gulf Arab central bankers agreed to create the nucleus of a joint central bank next year in a major step forward for monetary union but signaled that a new common currency would not be in circulation by an agreed 2010 target.” 260 In 2002, it was announced that the “Gulf states say they are seeking advice from the European Central Bank on their monetary union programme.” In February of 2008, Oman announced that it would not be joining the
monetary union. In November of 2008, it was announced that the “Final monetary union draft says Gulf central bank will be independent from governments of member states.” 
In March of 2009, it was reported that, “The GCC should not rush into forming a single currency as member states need to work out the framework for a regional central bank, Saudi Arabia's Central Bank Governor Muhammad Al Jasser.” Jasser was further quoted as saying, “It took the European
Union 45 years to put together a single currency. We should not rush.” In 2008, with the global financial crisis, new problems were posed for the GCC initiative, as “Pressure mounted last year on the GCC members to drop their currency pegs as inflation accelerated above 10 per cent in five of the six countries. All of the member states except Kuwait peg their currencies to the dollar and tend to follow the US Federal Reserve when setting interest rates.” 
An Asian Monetary Union
In 1997, the Brookings Institution, a prominent American think tank, discussed the possibilities of an East Asian Monetary Union, stating that, “the question for the 21st century is whether analogous monetary blocs will form in East Asia (and, for that matter, in the Western Hemisphere). With the dollar, the yen, and the single European currency floating against one another, other small open economies will be tempted to link up to one of the three.” However, “the linkage will be possible only if accompanied by radical changes in institutional arrangements like those contemplated by the European Union. The spread of capital mobility and political democratization will make it
prohibitively difficult to peg exchange rates unilaterally. Pegging will require international cooperation, and effective cooperation will require measures akin to monetary unification.” 263
In 2001, Asia Times Online wrote an article discussing a speech given by economist Robert A. Mundell at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University, at which he stated that, “[t]he "Asean plus three" (the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations plus China, Japan, and Korea) ‘should look to
the European Union as a model for closer integration of monetary policy, trade and eventually,
currency integration’.” 
On May 6, 2005, the website of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) announced that, “China, Japan, South Korea and the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have agreed to expand their network of bilateral currency swaps into what could become a virtual Asian Monetary Fund,” and that, “[f]inance officials of the 13 nations, who met in the sidelines of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) annual conference in Istanbul, appeared determined to turn
their various bilateral agreements into some sort of multilateral accord, although none of the officials would directly call it an Asian Monetary Fund.” 
In August of 2005, the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank published a report on the prospects of an East Asian Monetary Union, stating that East Asia satisfies the criteria for joining a monetary union, however, it states that compared to the European initiative, “The implication is that achieving any
monetary arrangement, including a common currency, is much more difficult in East Asia.” It further states that, “In Europe, a monetary union was achievable primarily because it was part of the larger process of political integration,” however, “There is no apparent desire for political integration in East
Asia, partly because of the great differences among those countries in terms of political systems, culture, and shared history. As a result of their own particular histories, East Asian countries remain particularly jealous of their sovereignty.”
Another major problem, as presented by the San Francisco Fed, is that, “East Asian governments appear much more suspicious of strong supranational institutions,” and thus, “in East Asia, sovereignty concerns have left governments reluctant to delegate significant authority to supranational bodies, at least so far.” It explains that as opposed to the steps taken to create a monetary union in Europe, “no broad free trade agreements have been achieved among the largest
countries in the region, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and China.” Another problem is that, “East Asia does not appear to have an obvious candidate for an internal anchor currency for a cooperative exchange rate arrangement. Most successful new currencies have been started on the back of an existing currency, establishing confidence in its convertibility, thus linking the old with the new.”
The report concludes that, “exchange rate stabilization and monetary integration are unlikely in the near term. Nevertheless, East Asia is integrating through trade, even without an emphasis on formal trade liberalization agreements,” and that, “there is evidence of growing financial cooperation in the region, including the development of regional arrangements for providing liquidity during crises through bilateral foreign exchange swaps, regional economic surveillance discussions, and the
development of regional bond markets.” Ultimately, “East Asia might also proceed along the same path [as Europe], first with loose agreements to stabilize currencies, followed later by tighter agreements, and culminating ultimately in adoption of a common anchor—and, after that, maybe an East Asia dollar.” 
In 2007, it was reported that, “Asia may need to establish its own monetary fund if it is to cope with future financial shocks similar to that which rocked the region 10 years ago,” and that, “Further Asian financial integration is the best antidote for Asian future financial crises.”  In September of 2007, Forbes reported that, “An East Asian monetary union anchored by Japan is feasible but the region lacks the political will to do it, the Asian Development Bank said.” Pradumna
Rana, an Asian Development Bank (ADB) economist, said that, “it appears feasible to establish amcurrency union in East Asia -- particularly among Indonesia, Japan, (South) Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand,” and that, “The economic potential for monetary integration in Asia is strong, even though the political underpinnings of such an accord are not yet in place.”
Further, “the real integration at the trade levels 'will actually reinforce the economic case for monetary union in Asia, in a similar way that real-sector integration did so in Europe,” and ultimately, “the road to an Asian monetary union could proceed on a 'multi-track, multi-speed' basis with a seamless Asian free trade area the goal on the trade side.” 268 In April of 2008, it was reported that, “ASEAN bank deputy governors and financial deputy ministers have met in Vietnam's central Da Nang
city, discussing issues on the financial and monetary integration and cooperation in the region.” 269
African Monetary Union
Currently, Africa has several different monetary union initiatives, as well as some existing monetary unions within the continent. One initiative is the “monetary union project of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS),” which is a “regional group of 15 countries in West
Africa.” Among the members are those of an already-existing monetary union in the region, the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU). The ECOWAS consists of Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo, Cape Verde, Liberia, Ghana, Gambia, and Nigeria. 
The African Union was founded in 2002, and is an intergovernmental organization consisting of 53 African states. In 2003, the Brookings Institution produced a paper on African economic integration. In it, the authors started by stating that, “Africa, like other regions of the world, is fixing its sights on creating a common currency. Already, there are projects for regional monetary unions, and the bidding process for an eventual African central bank is about to begin.” It states that, “A common
currency was also an objective of the Organization for African Unity and the African Economic Community, the predecessors of the AU,” and further, that, “The 1991 Abuja Treaty establishing the African Economic Community outlines six stages for achieving a single monetary zone for Africa that were set to be completed by approximately 2028. In the early stages, regional cooperation and integration within Africa would be strengthened, and this could involve regional monetary unions.
The final stage involves the establishment of the African Central Bank (ACB) and creation of a single African currency and an African Economic and Monetary Union.”
The paper further states that the African Central Bank (ACB) “would not be created until around 2020, [but] the bidding process for its location is likely to begin soon,” however, “there are plans for creating various regional monetary unions, which would presumably form building blocks for the single African central bank and currency.” 
In August of 2008, “Governors of African Central Banks convened in Kigali Serena Hotel to discuss issues concerning the creation of three African Union (AU) financial institutions,” following “the AU resolution to form the African Monetary Fund (AMF), African Central Bank (ACB) and the African Investment Bank (AIB).” The central bank governors “agreed that when established, the ACB would solely issue and manage Africa's single currency and monetary authority of the continent's economy.”
On March 2, 2009, it was reported that, “The African Union will sign a memorandum of understanding this month with Nigeria on the establishment of a continental central bank,” and that,
“The institution will be based in the Nigerian capital, Abuja, African Union Commissioner for Economic Affairs Maxwell Mkwezalamba told reporters.” Further, “As an intermediate step to the creation of the bank, the pan- African body will establish an African Monetary Institute within the next three years, he said at a meeting of African economists in the city,” and he was quoted as saying,
“We have agreed to work with the Association of African Central Bank Governors to set up a joint technical committee to look into the preparation of a joint strategy.”
The website for the Kenyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported that, “The African Union Commissioner for Economic Affairs Dr. Maxwell Mkwezalamba has expressed optimism for the adoption of a common currency for Africa,” and that the main theme discussed at the AU Commission meeting in Kenya was, “Towards the Creation of a Single African Currency: Review of the Creation of a Single African Currency: Which optimal Approach to be adopted to accelerate the creation of the unique continental currency.” 
A North American Monetary Union and the Amero
In 1999, the Fraser Institute, a prominent and highly influential Canadian think tank, published a report written by Economics professor and former MP, Herbert Grubel, called, The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union. He wrote that, “The plan for a North American Monetary Union presented in this study is designed to include Canada, the United States, and Mexico,” and a “North American Central Bank, like the European Central Bank, will have a constitution making it responsible only for the maintenance of price stability and not for full employment.” He opined that, “sovereignty is not infinitely valuable. The merit of giving up some aspects of sovereignty should be determined by the gains brought by such a sacrifice,” and that, “It is important to note that in practice Canada has given up its economic sovereignty in many areas, the most important of which involve the World Trade Organization (formerly the GATT), the North
American Free Trade Agreement,” as well as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. 
Also in 1999, the C.D. Howe Institute, another of Canada’s most prominent think tanks, produced a report titled, From Fixing to Monetary Union: Options for North American Currency Integration. In this document, it was written that, “The easiest way to broach the notion of a NAMU [North American Monetary Union] is to view it as the North American equivalent of the European Monetary Union (EMU) and, by extension, the euro.” 277 It further stated that the fact that “a NAMU would mean the end of sovereignty in Canadian monetary policy is clear. Most obviously, it would mean abandoning a made-in-Canada inflation rate for a US or NAMU inflation rate.” 
In May of 2007, Canada’s then Governor of the Central Bank of Canada, David Dodge, said that, “North America could one day embrace a euro-style single currency,” and that, “Some proponents have dubbed the single North American currency the ‘amero’.” Answering questions following his speech, Dodge said that, “a single currency was ‘possible’. 
In November of 2007, one of Canada’s richest billionaires, Stephen Jarislowsky, also a member of the board of the C.D. Howe Institute, told a Canadian Parliamentary committee that, “Canada should replace its dollar with a North American currency, or peg it to the U.S. greenback, to avoid the exchange rate shifts the loonie has experienced,” and that, “I think we have to really seriously start thinking of the model of a continental currency just like Europe.”  Former Mexican President Vicente Fox, while appearing on Larry King Live in 2007, was asked a question regarding the possibility of a common currency for Latin America, to which he responded by saying, “Long term, very long term. What we propose together, President Bush and myself, it's ALCA, which is a trade union for all of the Americas. And everything was running fluently until Hugo Chavez came. He decided to isolate himself. He decided to combat the idea and destroy the idea.” Larry King then asked, “It's going to be like the euro dollar, you mean?” to which Fox responded, “Well, that would be long, long term. I think the processes to go, first step into is trading agreement. And then further on, a new vision, like we are trying to do with NAFTA.” 
In January of 2008, Herbert Grubel, the author who coined the term “amero” for the Fraser Institute report, wrote an article for the Financial Post, in which he recommends fixing the Canadian loonie to the US dollar at a fixed exchange rate, but that there are inherent problems with having the US Federal Reserve thus control Canadian interest rates. He then wrote that, “there is a solution to this lack of credibility. In Europe, it came through the creation of the euro and formal end of the ability of national central banks to set interest rates. The analogous creation of the amero is not possible without the unlikely co-operation of the United States. This leaves the credibility issue to be solved by the unilateral adoption of a currency board, which would ensure that international payments imbalances automatically lead to changes in Canada's money supply and interest rates until the imbalances are ended, all without any actions by the Bank of Canada or influence by politicians. It would be desirable to create simultaneously the currency board and a New Canadian Dollar valued at par with the U.S. dollar. With longer-run competitiveness assured at US90¢ to the U.S. dollar.” 
In January of 2009, an online publication of the Wall Street Journal, called Market Watch, discussed the possibility of hyperinflation of the United States dollar, and then stated, regarding the possibility of an amero, “On its face, while difficult to imagine, it makes intuitive sense. The ability to combine Canadian natural resources, American ingenuity and cheap Mexican labor would allow North America to compete better on a global stage.” The author further states that, “If forward policy attempts to
induce more debt rather than allowing savings and obligations to align, we must respect the potential for a system shock. We may need to let a two-tier currency gain traction if the dollar meaningfully debases from current levels,” and that, “If this dynamic plays out -- and I've got no insight that it will - - the global balance of powers would fragment into four primary regions: North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. In such a scenario, ramifications would manifest through social unrest and
geopolitical conflict.”


A GLOBAL CURRENCY The Phoenix


In 1988, The Economist ran an article titled, Get Ready for the Phoenix, in which they wrote, “THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let's say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today's national currencies, which
by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the late twentieth century.” The article stated that, “The market crash [of 1987] taught [governments] that the pretence of policy cooperation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (ie, until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.” Amazingly the article states that, “Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stock market crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice. This points to a muddled sequence of emergency followed by patch-up
followed by emergency, stretching out far beyond 2018-except for two things. As time passes, the damage caused by currency instability is gradually going to mount; and the very trends that will make it mount are making the utopia of monetary union feasible.” Further, the article stated that, “The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate-and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate-would be in its charge.
Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit.” The author admits that, “This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside
world.”
The article concludes in stating that, “The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.” The last sentence states, “Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.” 
Recommendations for a Global Currency

In 1998, the IMF Survey discussed a speech given by James Tobin, a prominent American economist, in which he argued that, “A single global currency might offer a viable alternative to the floating rate.” He further stated that, “there was still a great need” for “lenders of last resort.” 


In 1999, economist Judy Shelton addressed the US House of Representatives Committee on Banking and Financial Services. In her testimony, she stated that,

“The continued expansion of free trade, the increased integration of financial markets and the advent of electronic commerce are all working to bring about the need for an international monetary standard---a global unit of account.”


She further explained that, “Regional currency unions seem to be the next step in the evolution toward some kind of global monetary order.

Europe has already adopted a single currency. Asia may organize into a regional currency bloc to offer protection against speculative assaults on the individual currencies of weaker nations. Numerous countries in Latin America are considering various monetary
arrangements to insulate them from financial contagion and avoid the economic consequences of devaluation. An important question is whether this process of monetary evolution will be intelligently directed or whether it will simply be driven by events. In my opinion, political leadership can play a decisive role in helping to build a more orderly, rational monetary system than the current free-for-all approach to exchange rate relations.”


Economist Judy Shelton further stated that, “As we have seen in Europe, the sequence of development is

(1) you build a common market, and

(2) you establish a common currency.

Indeed, until you have a common currency, you don’t truly have an efficient common market.” She concludes by stating, “Ideally, every nation should stand willing to convert its currency at a fixed rate into a universal reserve asset. That would automatically create a global monetary union based on a common unit of account. The
alternative path to a stable monetary order is to forge a common currency anchored to an asset of intrinsic value. While the current momentum for dollarization should be encouraged, especially for Mexico and Canada, in the end the stability of the global monetary order should not rest on any
single nation.” 


Paul Volcker, former Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, stated in 2000, that,

“If we are to have a truly global economy, a single world currency makes sense.”

In a speech delivered by a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, it was stated that Paul Volcker “might be right, and we might one day have a single world currency. Maybe European integration, in the same way as any other regional integration, could be seen as a step towards the ideal situation of a fully
integrated world. If and when this world will see the light of day is impossible to say. However, what I can say is that this vision seems as impossible now to most of us as a European monetary union seemed 50 years ago, when the process of European integration started.” 
In 2000, the IMF held an international conference and published a brief report titled, One World, One Currency: Destination or Delusion?, in which it was stated that, “As perceptions grow that the world is gradually segmenting into a few regional currency blocs, the logical extension of such a trend also emerges as a theoretical possibility: a single world currency. If so many countries see benefits from currency integration, would a world currency not maximize these benefits?” It outlines how, “The dollar bloc, already underpinned by the strength of the U.S. economy, has been extended further by dollarization and regional free trade pacts. The euro bloc represents an
economic union that is intended to become a full political union likely to expand into Central and Eastern Europe. A yen bloc may emerge from current proposals for Asian monetary cooperation. A currency union may emerge among Mercosur members in Latin America, a geographical currency zone already exists around the South African rand, and a merger of the Australian and New Zealanddollars is a perennial topic in Oceania.” The summary states that, “The same commercial efficiencies, economies of scale, and physical imperatives that drive regional currencies together also presumably exist on the next level—the global scale.” Further, it reported that, “The smaller and more vulnerable economies of the world— those that the international community is now trying hardest to help—would have most to gain from the certainty and stability that would accompany a single world currency.” 288 Keep in mind, this document was produced by the IMF, and so its recommendations for what it says would likely “help”
the smaller and more vulnerable countries of the world, should be taken with a grain – or bucket – of salt.
Economist Robert A. Mundell has long called for a global currency. On his website, he states that the creation of a global currency is “a project that would restore a needed coherence to the international monetary system, give the International Monetary Fund a function that would help it to promote stability, and be a catalyst for international harmony.” He states that, “The benefits from a world currency would be enormous. Prices all over the world would be denominated in the same unit and would be kept equal in different parts of the world to the extent that the law of one price was nallowed to work itself out. Apart from tariffs and controls, trade between countries would be as easy as it is between states of the United States.” 

Renewed Calls for a Global Currency

On March 16, 2009, Russia suggested that, “the G20 summit in London in April should start establishing a system of managing the process of globalization and consider the possibility of creating a supra-national reserve currency or a ‘super-reserve currency’.” Russia called for “the creation of a supra-national reserve currency that will be issued by international financial institutions,” and that, “It looks expedient to reconsider the role of the IMF in that process and also to determine the
possibility and need for taking measures that would allow for the SDRs (Special Drawing Rights) to become a super-reserve currency recognized by the world community.”

A copy of Ian MacBean’s 1929 letter to L. Ron Hubbard was an exhibit in the Gerald Armstrong 1 trial.

Scientology Roots Chapter Nine – 1 Hubbard’s Lifelong Intelligence Career

See:
http://www.awn.bz/Scientology_createdbyMI6.html
http://www.awn.bz/Ron_Hubbard_GroomedByMI6.html
http://www.awn.bz/Scientology_MI6_RootsP1.html
http://www.awn.bz/Ron_Hubbard_MI6_Agent_P2.html

https://mikemcclaughry.wordpress.com/the-reading-library/scientology/scientology-roots/scientology-roots-chapter-twelve-1-hubbards-lifelong-intelligence-career/


Scientology Roots Chapter Nine – 1 Hubbard’s Lifelong Intelligence Career
.
The British nobility has been working on a Grand Plan to make themselves the ruthless ruler of the entire world.
The rest of humanity does not agree to their idea that the British nobility should rule the world. They do not want to be obedient subjects, servants and slaves who live under the boot and say-so of the British aristocracy.
Most men want to live as free men who live under their own will and say-so.
Thus the British slavemasters conducted mental and spiritual research. Their real interest in studying the human mind and spirit was to learn how to control men, so they could modify his behavior into what they want all men to be – willing subjects under rule by the British nobility.
The Cecil family is one of the top British slavemaster families. Their family has been the head of British intelligence for over 400 years. Robert Cecil was the leader of an influential family called the Cecil Bloc.
He was the head of British intelligence and he was a British Prime Minister.

Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil (Lord Salisbury)

One of his sisters had a son named Arthur Balfour. He was in the Cecil family and he was also a head of British intelligence and a Prime Minister of Britain.  20 Arthur J. Balfour

Development of Dianetics and Scientology

Stephen Pearl Andrews was a leader in the religious movement called Spiritualism.

With Fairfax gone, the need for diversity in Australia's media is greater than ever
The Guardian   Lenore Taylor

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/nov/19/with-fairfax-gone-the-need-for-diversity-in-australias-media-is-greater-than-ever
If Australians think a plurality of news voices is important, they can do something about it 

We’re keen to provide a good deal more than just 'some degree of competitive constraint'
Australians will be poorer when the Nine Network takes over the 177-year-old Fairfax Media company – a deal that cleared its last real hurdle with shareholder approval on Monday.
That’s not a barb from a competitor, but the considered view of the competition watchdog that signed it off.
In something of a statement of the obvious, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said the $4bn takeover would shrink the major sources of Australian news from five to four – Nine, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, Kerry Stokes’ Seven West Media and the ABC.
But despite this, the ACCC determined the deal did not reduce competition in the market for Australian news and information sufficiently to be in breach of the law because “other players, albeit smaller, now provide some degree of competitive constraint”. The first listed “other player” was us, Guardian Australia.
Providing a new source of quality, independent Australian news has been our aim since we launched five and a half years ago. But at the moment the need for it is growing more quickly than we can.

We’re keen to provide a good deal more than just 'some degree of competitive constraint'

Our colleagues in the newsrooms formerly known as Fairfax, some of the most respected journalists in the business, will continue to strive to produce excellent journalism and their editorial independence has been promised by Nine.
When questioned about how he would manage “the perception of the great Fairfax independence and neutrality” the former Howard government treasurer Peter Costello, who chairs Nine and will also chair the new company, insisted Nine’s independence had been enhanced under his chairmanship and he was “probably a lot less interventionist at Nine than some of my other predecessors as chairman of Nine were”.
Considered observers remain desperately concerned about how long the Fairfax journalistic culture can survive.

And as academic Margaret Simons has pointed out, the “other players” in the news market are highly unlikely to be able to compensate for a reduction in local or regional news and there is no guarantee that, if Fairfax regional papers are sold off by Nine, they could survive on their own.
However valid these concerns prove to be, our readers – more than 4 million of them according to the last Nielsen survey – are demanding we do more, and there is so much more for us to do holding politicians and corporations to account through news and investigations, reporting on the real world impact of policies and all the issues our readers care about and feel are under-reported elsewhere.
We don’t want to get bigger to make a profit of a particular size or to sell a certain number of ads, and we don’t need to deliver a return to shareholders or to a proprietor because we don’t have either of those.
We want to get bigger for only one reason – so our journalism can have greater clout, so we can report more and be read by more Australians.
We want to make a profit, indeed we just made our first, but only in order to reinvest it in our journalism.
We want to attract advertising, absolutely we do, but advertising will never dictate what we write. Our fastest-growing source of revenue incentivises the opposite of clickbait. It is reader revenue, voluntary contributions from Australians who value us as an independent source of news and are motivated to contribute by the very best that we can do.
It’s a very different response to the same disruption that forced the Nine and Fairfax deal, the upending of the media’s business model by the big digital platforms Facebook and Google.
And as the Guardian’s editor-in-chief, Katharine Viner, announced this month the Guardian has now received financial support, through contributions or subscriptions, from more than 1 million readers around the world, while our journalism remains free and accessible to all. That figure includes 89,000 Australian readers who have supported our journalism here.

How the Fairfax takeover will further concentrate Australia's media
Right now Guardian Australia is dwarfed by the big four who dominate news in this country, but we’ve been growing in both reach and influence. This year, for example, our journalism has been nominated for eight Walkley Awards.
And as I wrote when the Fairfax takeover was first announced, the way things are is not how they have to be.
If Australians think a plurality of news voices is important in a society and a democracy, if they are worried that our concentration of media ownership – already among the highest in the world – just got worse, they can do something about it.
They can read and support Guardian Australia, or some of the other new online players. We’re keen to provide a good deal more than just “some degree of competitive constraint” and we think Australians are richer for having access to a diversity of news and views.
• Lenore Taylor is the editor of Guardian Australia
• Support our independent journalism by making a contribution

Edward Mandell House Edward  and William Wiseman

Here is a contemporary audio and video publication of Hubbard’s works, also called “The Golden Dawn.”

​Be ready to surrender all your gold to listen to Golden Dawn.

Hubbard in Peking, under the tutelage of British MI6 agent Ian MacBean

Wikipedia - A Tool Of The Ruling Elite
ON CONTACT - 
Helen writes for RT
And is on Twitter @Bellocirapture23
http://www.helenofdestroy.com/  - RT America: Published on Oct 20, 2018
On the latest episode of On Contact, investigative journalist Helen Buyniski exposes Jimmy Wales' egalitarian Wikipedia as yet another tool of the ruling elite. More from Helen here: http://helenofdestroy.com/index.php/4...
Find RT America in your area: http://rt.com/where-to-watch/ 
Or watch us online: http://rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air/ 
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTAmerica Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_America
Category: News & Politics- ON CONTACT: Wikipedia – A Tool Of The Ruling Elite

Scientology High Priestess Shelly Miscavige will 'never be free', father-in-law claims 
Scientology High Priestess Shelly Miscavige will 'never be free', father-in-law claims. Source: 60 minutes
Where is the missing wife of Scientology's ruthless leader? | 60 Minutes Australia

11 Feb, 2019
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12202540

2,078,630 views

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7QWifeY2_A

60 Minutes Australia
Published on Feb 11, 2019
Shelly Miscavige is the wife of Scientology leader David Miscavige, the high priestess of Scientology who vanished 13 years ago. 60 Minutes investigate into the missing Queen’s whereabouts and speak to the former Scientologist’s who want answers. WATCH more of 60 Minutes Australia: https://www.60minutes.com.au LIKE 60 Minutes Australia on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/60Minutes9 FOLLOW 60 Minutes Australia on Twitter: https://twitter.com/60Mins FOLLOW 60 Minutes Australia on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/60minutes9 For forty years, 60 Minutes have been telling Australians the world’s greatest stories. Tales that changed history, our nation and our lives. Reporters Liz Hayes, Allison Langdon, Tara Brown, Charles Wooley, Liam Bartlett and Tom Steinfort look past the headlines because there is always a bigger picture. Sundays are for 60 Minutes.
news.com.au
By: Natalie Wolfe

Scientology: Mysterious Deaths (Scientology Documentary) - Real Stories

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTtzc7sTZ-8

695,767 views
Real Stories
Published on Feb 15, 2017

Scientology is one of the world’s most controversial and secretive religions. Famous followers extol its virtues but a series of suspicious deaths brings into question its treatment of their members. In this film, we investigate three cases of deaths of Scientology members. We find incomplete police investigations, suspicious circumstances and family members who are convinced there is more to their loved ones deaths’ than meets the eye. A look at the dark side of a new but powerful religion. Want to watch more full-length Documentaries? Click here: http://bit.ly/1GOzpIu Follow us on Twitter for more - https://twitter.com/realstoriesdocs Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/RealStoriesC... Instagram - @realstoriesdocs Content licensed from Java Films.

Any queries, please contact us at: realstories@littledotstudios.com


Comments
Sz Balazs: I can't watch a Tom Cruise movie anymore…


ohrabbits: It's not controversial. It's a widely recognized crock. Oh, and a scam. Oh yes, with a totalitarian world view.


Nova Chandra:  Dangerous cult that has ruined many lives. It robs you of your money, mental health and family. Do NOT join. Very dangerous.


alysebell1: How is this cult allowed to operate


Rayne SG a.k.a. inkyrayne: You expose everything about yourself so it can later be use to hold you hostage in the cult or blackmail you.


anastasia46: so scientology wants to operate under it's own laws, and ignore US laws and rules. just for that alone, they should be shut down.


Naginaoeofschwarz: That's pretty bad...considering to me this looks like a Cult mixed with a pyramid scam?

Malvakai P: Kirstie Alley - proof that Scientology doesnt work.


stee: A costly "religion"…


popeye
"Bridge to Total Bankruptcy".

rae L.
Started by a science fiction writer... What more do you need to know?

billydeeuk
The Clearwater Police Force needs investigating. Root and branch. They are corrupt

Amanda Fevrier
SMH (Shaking My head)

Moreen Hailche: @Amanda Fevrier try nodding...you'll feel better.

BabyKitty000
Money talks - particularly Scientology money

Amanda De Villiers
@BabyKitty000 magen Markl

Susan McDermott
Obviously someone in Scientology has infiltrated the Law enforcement there.

Frank Blackcrow
The possibility is that their all Scientology as well, so would follow their own rules for themselves as not to investigate.. Shelly Miscavage... would be a good reason for an FBI investigation into the police that you may as well call, Scientology's owned police. This is why the big question was asked and not seen to be followed through as from any form of "proof of life" investigations to the leaders own wife.. as that no proof of life was even provided by the police when asked about investigating proof of life of Shelly Miscavage as of being seen to be missing for over 13 years makes for any police investigation seem warranted.. that then what is given is no evidence that was ever carried out as to any form of proof of life as to be recorded or possibly even seen by police as of any investigation seems to be a moot point to even ask.. if the police are as well scirntologists

@Moreen Hailche good one
Dulcelina Cabral @Moreen Hailche good one

Sabrina Adam
Humanity never ceases to astound, I know people say all religion is fake but come on a religion called Scientology created by a sci-fi writer who was a known scammer. And you have to pay your way up lol People are idiots. I only feel sorry for the innocent children born into this pyramid scheme.

Agueda C: NOT a Church. Scientology is an EVIL sinister CULT!!! They are horse thieves, and DESTROY Families!!!!
qwyzl
sounds like the clearwater police should be investigated by the FBI.  wonder how many of them have off-shore bank accounts…

Adrienne Wrn
Clearwater PD is definitely not impartial.


JayGoldenBeach
Sounds like the Church has some influence with the local Clearwater FL police dept. is very shady.

O'frabjous Day
I can't for the life of me understand why anybody would join a cult or religion in the first place. But to join one that was founded by a guy who wrote science fiction novels?? That's not a red flag, man, that's a flying unplugged refrigerator.

Sunny.bias
I was SO close to getting into Scientology, trying to find happiness and recovery - but thankfully someone I know discovered I was getting into it, and told how her brother committed suicide after being in it. How he couldn't get out of the cult. So I found out the truth about Scientology and left while I could. Thank God!!


Jackbox
Scientology is in rapid decline. Its only drive now is to buy up real estate on the backs of the misguided.


Finnegan
Dear FBI, Clearwater police are covering up murders and hiding evidence, Investigate!

Moonbase Alpha1 year ago
Where is the FBI in all this?

adamtzsch
Regarding the Germans, it is now standard practice in Germany for an “I am not, and never have been a Scientologist” clause in employment contracts. Baby steps.

Amy Fabian
The Bridge to Total Bankruptcy..... ...for everyone but Tom Cruise and the like.

aadrianlee
It's is a CULT plane and simple.

Metia Harris
Secretive Church= Evil as hell.


Fiona Gregory
It is all about money and greed.

Dreyden
They sound like a modern day mafia.

ThePortuguese
I'm from Clearwater. The downtown is completely dominated by scientologists. They own nearly every building. Nobody goes there except scientologists. The city and police all collude with scientology. There's not much anyone living there can do about it, they have too much money and legal protection.


RocketmanRockyMatrix
The Clearwater Police are covering up for Scientology.


Swnsasy _
I am absolutely astonished that I live in Tampa and hear nothing about these deaths in the news or papers. It is impossible to have that many deaths in one location and the police to think they are all suicide!? You have more deaths in this one place than at a casino. Bull!! Money rules the justice system, always has.


Alice Kirbyson
Aye Psychiatry is banned in Scientology because they don't want people to know how crazy they actually are and seek help. All those personal questions in auditing are for later purposes too. If you try to leave they'll dig up everything they've got on you and destroy your reputation with it. Happened to my english teacher at college, she was followed by private investigators for three years and suffered a smear campaign to get her fired.

suzy klitgaard
I remember as a teenager, found my dad's book. L Ron Hubbard. That creeped me out. later in my adult life, researched scientology. A CULT for sure


Shirley pilger
They want to know everything so they have ammunition when you try to leave the organization. This "religion" is based on a work of fiction. Shows how stupid people can be.

Troow
I have personal experience with these devils. People will commit suicide because they will bully anyone. Even kids as young as 5 years old to get at their parents. They will use anything against people, true or not. Pure evil in the name of money.

Fiona Gregory
Why don't they just live their life with cats and doing their hobbies.

Dee Findlay
OMG! The lies, this evil, dangerous cult can put forward. Thank you for the excellent exposure. So sad!

Anna
Cults aren't anything new. Disturbing, yes, but they have always existed worldwide. What's more disturbing about this case is how the entire city and the government seem to be in on it. Creepy.

60 Minutes BOMBSHELL interview Jenna Miscavige speaks ou
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=decYgnNq1wo
1,387,103 views

Surviving Scientology
Published on Jul 23, 2013
Jenna Miscavige is the niece of David Miscavige. Having lost her childhood to the "Church" who do not believe in the family unit, Jenna wrote a book "Beyond Belief" and did a series of media interviews. Parental time is minimal when a child is raised in the Church. See my other video "Anti -kids, Anti Family, Anti-Psychiatry." http://youtu.be/0HZ5QNI8qQ8 Radio Podcasts http://www.survivingscientologyradio.... Follow me on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/karendelac Follow me on Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/KarendlaCarier
 
Tanja Castle (David Miscavige's secretary) leaves Gold Base
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdHEh6toiWI
SoUpstat
Published on Jul 10, 2012

David Miscavige's secretary Source: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/video?id=... Please support ABC's great journalism and visit the link above. http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/html5/vid... Dear ABC, please put this on YouTube under your official account.

Amethystar
Scientology destroys lives, families, and needs to be stopped. Scientology is a brainwashing cult.


Victoria Elizabeth
She needs to be on Leah's show .

Daniel Alvarez
The Feds need to raid this cult and bring up Miscavige on charges of kidnapping, harassment, abuse and extortion. This tool is a megalomaniac that needs to be put in prison.


zdrumdude
If you have to escape or flee your church....you may be in a cult!

janebeatty2010
Razor wire?! Wow...that was a prison. So glad they got out safely.

DrunkenIrishBasterd
And this isn't illegal?


5winder
I'm happy this couple managed to escape together... I think that is rare with this cult. Miscavige should be in prison, as well as anyone who protects him.

ibuprofenPill
Why does Scientology still have religion status with the IRS? It's a straight-up evil cult.

Rockster9693 years ago
what a nice pic at the end, them together, baby on the way and looking very happy. Well done guys! :-)

S S:  David Miscavige is no different to Kim Jong Un in North Korea. Definitely needs to be investigated

jlarsena: Law enforcement should be ashamed of what this cult gets away with. All in the name of religion.
Linda French: Pure evil!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Gia Marie

How many people have to come forward before the Government steps in? Imo people are literally being held captive. Taking away their cell phones so they can't communicate with each other? That's not how any "church" would operate.

Mary Avila
They deny everything, but its all true.  I've lived it, seen it or know someone personally who has lived it.  They should be stopped.

Tiger Steele
Wit Wile
Isn't holding people against their will called KIDNAPPING?

Barbara Turner: And we all know Tom Cruise is as crazy as an outhouse rat

hereand now
..and Tom Cruise says he is proud to be a Scientologist and considers it an honor you have to earn. How screwed up and brainwashed is delusional Tom Cruise?!? They are holding people against their will in something similar to a prison. They call this a religion?!?!? More like a concentration camp for very unfortunate victims.

Barbara Turner: This is not a church...it is a prison.

nicoletta castle: leave the uniform to the real navy !

CH1CK3NxSALAD
If my wife was held in there you better believe I would have gotten her out Navy SEAL style lol

Bill Russell
Any church that breaks up a marriages is under a curse of their own making

Arleen Fackina: And if they check the grounds, they'll probably find the body of Shelly Miscavige

gap949: Amazing how this is allowed in America ....Wake up, !

le th: It's allowed all over the world. Scientology is just about everywhere. It's a batshit crazy cult

Umishiru
@le th Not so in Germany & Russia.

DiaryOfa ManeAddict
Not so Amazing America allows quit a lot of bs and turn a blind eye. Money and power is all you need.

Cal Schmidt: @DiaryOfa ManeAddict And pale skin

V.:  @Cal Schmidt Good grief! "pale" again huh?

Cal Schmidt @V. Am I wrong? No.

Zoe Lauranc: what does pale skin mean?

Alister Mitchell: David miscavaige has short man syndrome

Lori Stewart: Alister Mitchell Napoleon complex

Mrjolie 666: Alister Mitchell LoL he’s even shorter than Tom C Definitely suffers from Little Man Syndrome

Da Xman
God bless these two for what they endured to be together - it would make an intense movie.


Ivana Ivana
So all these people are lying, and the church is not? Why is this happening? There are thousands people with stories like this one…

Stuart Heath
well i've looked at a lot of vids and comments on this cult and the years roll by without any action. the US government, FBI, CIA and other departments have not acted this tells me that there must be insiderers who are stopping investigations from going forward. the evidence is there. are there kickbacks being paid at the highest level?. david miscaviage is like a damian out of the OMEN movie. For me I dont see an end to this unless the government grows some balls and takes this seriously.

 
WHEN WILL ENOUGH BE ENOUGH!!! TOO MANY PEOPLE ...

TELL THE SAME STORIES!! TIME FOR THIS CULT TO BE TAKEN APART!! NO TAX ..EXEMPT STATUS...IT IS NOT A CHURCH!!!

It's been more than a decade since Shelly Miscavige, the wife of Scientology's revered yet controversial leader David Miscavige, has been seen alive or in public.
The last people to see Shelly alive all agree that she vanished in disturbing circumstances 13 years ago.
Many former members of the highly-secretive church allege Shelly's husband David would be one of the few people to know where his wife, the high Priestess of Scientology, may be.
In a new investigation by 60 Minutes, the current affairs program travelled to the US and to the gates of Scientology's most secure compound to ask, where is Shelly Miscavige?
The church has previously claimed Ms Miscavige has gone to ground, working for Scientology behind the scenes while her husband runs things publicly.
The Gold Base Compound, the international headquarters of Scientology. Photo / 60 Minutes
Others, including Ms Miscavige's former friend Leah Remini, fear for her safety.
Ron Miscavige, the father of David and a member of Scientology for 42 years, is terrified for his daughter-in-law.
"Shelly, she'll never be free," Mr Miscavige tells 60 Minutes.
The church, in its response to the programme, said show was passing off "fiction and salacious gossip as truth".
It's alleged Shelly was locked away by her husband more than a decade ago, less than a year after the high-profile wedding of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes in 2005.
Through tears, Ron admits it would be easy for the church to have done exactly that.

"I know it's difficult to believe, but the worst thing about this is I'm telling you the truth," he said.
"That's the worst goddamn thing that's going on in this interview. This happens. These are pretty bad people, but they don't have a conscience and that lets them do it.
"She has no hope whatsoever of ever getting into the good graces of Dave or going free. None."
Ron left the church in 2012 and was cut off by Scientology — and his entire family — because of it.
Ron Miscavige fears for his daughter-in-law. Photo / 60 Minutes

"I feel grief-y because look I lost my family. It's like they're dead. They're gone. My two daughters, my grandchildren," he said.
Mike Rinder, an Aussie and Scientology's former special affairs director, said the church has left hundreds of families broken.
"If there's one thing that is the common thread that we see throughout the stories of Scientology it's broken families. It's destroyed families," Rinder tells the program.
The former Scientology member was once one of highest-ranked officials in the church.

He last spoke to Shelly in August 2005. She had expressed concerns to him about the church but a month later, she'd vanished.
Tony Ortega, a long-time critic and former member of Scientology, has spent years investigating the church.

The Scientology reporter claims Shelly's final moment of freedom came in mid-2005, not long after the high priestess reportedly completed admin work without her husband's approval.

"He just blows his stack, and I've got eye witnesses for this," Ortega told 60 Minutes.
"He had the biggest temper tantrum of all time. A week later she vanished."
Shelly and David Miscavige. Photo / 60 Minutes
Leah Remini, who clawed her way out of Scientology in 2013, is worried sick for her friend.
"You can't just do what you want with a human being," Remini told the current affairs program.
Remini filed a missing persons report for Shelly in 2013

The Los Angeles Police Department ruled the report was "unfounded" and closed the case, claiming officers had met with Shelly.
A lawyer representing Ms Miscavige told 60 Minutes the Scientology queen was "disgusted" about Remini's allegations and denied suggestions she was missing.
But Remini is still fighting.

"It's getting boring, this response from Scientology. And I'm gonna say it. I'll say it every time now. Cut the bullshit," she said.
"If what we're saying is untrue, sue us, me and Mike (Rinder). We're ready for the lawsuit, so that's what I keep saying. we welcome your lawsuit. We welcome it."

The moment Leah Remini noticed
As Leah Remini stood with her Scientology friends at the 2006 wedding of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, she looked around for her friend Shelly.
David Miscavige, the leader of the highly-secretive church, was there as Cruise's best man.
But his wife Shelly, who he married in 1982, wasn't.
That was the first time Remini, who very publicly left Scientology in 2013, held concerns for her long-time friend.
Leah Remini and Mark Rinder welcome a lawsuit from Scientology. Photo / 60 Minutes

"Shelly was always where David Miscavige was," Remini told ABC News in 2015.
"It was a wedding of the century … it was like, "where's Shelly?'

"It's such a simple thing. It's a big wedding that the leader of the Church is here and his wife isn't. It's getting weirder because you're making it weirder," Remini said, claiming anyone she tried to ask wouldn't give her a straight answer.
Nancy Many, who left Scientology in 1996, said Remini was "attacked" when she asked about Shelly's disappearance.

"Leah asked about David's wife and came under an unbelievable torrent of attack on her, an attack and inquisition," Many told Reuters in 2013.
Nine months after Remini questioned the whereabouts of her friend, Shelly made what has remained her final public appearance.

In her December 2016 series Scientology and the Aftermath, Remini said LAPD's response left her with more questions.
"There's still answers that I need. I do not know that she is alive. I do not know that she's not being held against her will," she said.
"I do not know these things and so if the church produces her, by bringing her to an event, even if she went on a program and said, 'Hi, Leah Remini. Go f*** yourself,' I'd be happy to know that she was alive.

"The police department should say, 'Yes, we've seen her.' No, I wasn't told that. I was told that a representative saw her or spoke to her. I'm going to continue to get and gather information."

In a statement released ahead of Remini's eight-part documentary, the church said the actress "seeks publicity by maliciously spreading lies about the Church using the same handful of bitter zealots who were kicked out years ago for chronic dishonesty and corruption and whose false claims the Church refuted years ago, including through judicial decisions".

Ron Hubbard’s next intelligence assignment was issuing British propaganda.
William Wiseman was the head of MI6 in the United States. In the mid 1930′s Wiseman was sent to Hollywood where he used his influence to “encourage a favorable portrayal of the British Empire in American films”

Edward Alexander Crowley

 Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil (Lord Salisbury)

They're Spending Billions to Chip Our Brains
Truthstream Media
Please help support us on Patreon, read our goals here: https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia Truthstream Can Be Found Here: Our Film: TheMindsofMen.net Site: http://TruthstreamMedia.com Twitter: @TruthstreamNews DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX

In 1936 Hubbard gets “called to Hollywood” (likely by Wiseman) – a British intelligence assignment.  39
Memory And Automaticity, an LRH lecture 16 December 1952 –
I worked for Hollywood for about a year… This is clear back in 1936 and 37.

Commander Thompson was very close friends with Clara Thompson. She worked at Chestnut Lodge Sanitarium which is only a few miles away from Saint Elizabeths Hospital. She was trained at Tavistock Clinic, the place where John Rawlings Rees was working.

Woodrow Wilson

David K.E. Bruce

Face the reality of racism in Japan -  COMMENTARY / JAPAN
BY JOHN G. RUSSELL
John G. Russell is a professor of cultural anthropology at Gifu University.

The Japanese Times    OPINION









The selection of Ariana Miyamoto as Miss Universe Japan in 2015 prompted a tsunami of online nastiness, raising issues of not only Japan's racial complexes but also its contempt for a wide range of others. | BLOOMBERG
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2018/06/03/commentary/japan-commentary/face-reality-racism-japan/#.XMSmZOhKiU
 
GIFU - Recent events continue to suggest that discussions of racism in Japan typically prove problematic. This is largely because those discussions typically present it as a “uniquely” Western phenomenon, a matter of black and white or white and nonwhite, from which a mythic “uniquely monoracial” Japan has been spared.
Rather, when the issue is broached, as it was recently following controversies provoked by blackface performances, it is dismissed as arising from Japanese racial naivete. And while a conscious antipathy may not motivate some of these acts, a more insidious implicit bias remains.
A recent study of implicit bias by Matsumoto University psychologist Kazuo Mori notes that Japanese have an implicit bias against blacks, concluding that “Japanese participants showed an implicit preference for ‘white people’ over ‘black people.’ ” Mori suggests that this bias may be the product of the “media in which whites are used ‘for delivering a good message.’ ”
In a letter to The Japan Times last month, a reader complained of racial profiling at Chubu Centrair International Airport’s arrival area where, while waiting to greet an older relative with his 4-year-old son, he was approached by airport police, the fourth time out of six trips to the airport. Of 40 people in the area, it was only they, two conspicuous non-Japanese, who were singled out.
Those who have attempted to dismantle the myth of a racism-free Japan have usually faced harsh criticism. U.N. Special Rapporteur Doudou Diene’s 2006 report on racism and ethnic discrimination in Japan was largely ignored by the Japanese media and severely criticized by right-wing commentators.
Perhaps, as his critics asserted, nine days was too short a period to accurately assess the problem. Yet, whatever its putative flaws, Diene attempted to accomplish something that the Japanese government had long refused to do.
When 11 years later the Justice Ministry released its first-ever nationwide survey of racial and ethnic discrimination in Japan, it reported that 30 percent of non-Japanese respondents (the majority ethnic Koreans and Chinese residents) reported they had been the target of discriminatory speech. Over 40 percent reported they had been the victims of housing discrimination.
Not all racial/ethnic bias is implicit, however. Indeed, if the Japanese government — or anyone else for that matter — wants to know about explicit racism in Japan, all it need do is surf the internet or turn to the Cabinet Office’s own online forum, the now defunct Government Monitoring System (GMS), which until disbanded in 2017 had no problem posting hate-filled comments, many calling for the expulsion of ethnic minorities and foreigners.
Despite a disclaimer that it would not publish user comments deemed “slanderous and discriminatory,” it continued to do so on the grounds that it had to “respect the opinions of users,” a decision that speaks volumes about the seriousness with which it treated hate speech and the proclivities of its users.
Although Japan has been a signatory to of the United Nations International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination since 1995, it — like the United States, another bastion of venomous racial invective and resentment — does not criminalize hate speech. The Japanese government rationalizes its own inaction on the grounds that racial discrimination in “racially homogeneous” Japan is so minimal that legal action to combat it is unnecessary.
For its part, the Justice Ministry has argued that such statements as “sokoku e kaere” that urge non-Japanese or persons thought not to be sufficiently Japanese (often despite their actual nationality) to return to their “homeland” do not constitute hate speech. Yet the ministry’s own home page displays both “Stop! Hate Speech” posters and a YouTube video on the matter that define hate speech as words that “call for the expulsion from Japan or killing of persons from a specific country.”
Apparently, the Cabinet Office did not get the memo, though as the Moritomo Gakuen, Kake Gakuen and Ground Self-Defense Force mission logs scandals have proven, Japan’s ministries have an uncanny penchant for not keeping track of their documents.
The problem, however, is not confined to the GMS. Social networking services and online forums are also rife with racist and xenophobic vitriol, and any criticism of Japan and the current administration is likely to result in their critics being accused of being “anti-Japan Japanese,” foreign agents and terrorists.
Ironically, such discriminatory trolling is often, well, indiscriminate. Hatred for one group coalesces into a putrid miasma of disdain aimed at any and all groups that are non-Japanese, or as the case may be, “insufficiently Japanese.” Consider the case of Ariana Miyamoto, a hāfu (biracial) whose selection as Miss Universe Japan in 2015 prompted a tsunami of online nastiness, raising issues of not only Japan’s racial complexes but also of its contempt for a wide range of others.
Among the comments: “Ignoring the reality of American racism, she blames everything on Japan — just like a Korean,” and, “She should be shot to death by one of America’s racist cops. She doesn’t deserve to live.”
These online missives (and there are hundreds more, many far more extreme) appear to have been motivated, in part, by the fact that Miyamoto dared to call out Japan’s racism in interviews. As anyone who follows online forums knows, Japanese (and Miyamato is Japanese) who criticize Japan have their Japanese bona fides questioned and run the risk of being denounced as Japan-hating crypto-ethnic Koreans, as was suggested by many of the attacks on Miyamoto.
Anyone who imagines that the comments on Miyamoto are atypical might take a look at the Japanese online comments posted in response to the marriage of Meghan Markle, another hāfu, to Britain’s Prince Harry. A small, comparatively mild sampling: “[Prince Harry] married a nigger whore”; “The end of England.”
Japanese “ignorance” of the racism in its midst is not limited to questionable blackface performances, though the Japanese media does little to educate the public on such matters.
How ironic it is that in Japan, which former Prime Minster Yasuhiro Nakasone once boasted was a cutting edge “information society,” much of the information it spews forth is spiked with racist acrimony. Not so Cool, Japan. But then again, judging from the current direction of world events, racism does appear to have become the new black. Indeed, there is little solace in the fact that hate-fueled rumors like those spread by mouth following the Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923 that resulted in the massacre of ethnic Koreans at the hands of vigilantes, are today spread via the internet, sometimes by the government’s own sites and with its tacit approval.

L  Ron Hubbard as a young child

All of the basic mental, spiritual, and religious ideas found in Dianetics and Scientology were already developed by the Society for Psychical Research, before L. Ron Hubbard was even born. That includes the therapy used.

INTERNET DEFENCE LEAGUE - MAKE SURE THE INTERNET  NEVER LOSES. EVER.

https://www.internetdefenseleague.org/


The Internet Blackout was just the beginning. On July 12th, we need to join together to protect net neutrality. Together, our websites and personal networks can mobilize the planet to defend free speech & free choice online. The #CatSignal has been activated. Are you in?


L. Ron_Hubbard_was_An_MI6_Agent 

 Lenore Taylor, editor of Guardian Australia: ‘We want to get bigger for only one reason – so our journalism can have greater clout, so we can report more and be read by more Australians.’ Photograph: Carly Earl for the Guardian

Nobuyuki Ogasawara Journalist's legacy: shedding light on societal injustices
BY KEIJI HIRANO KYODO - NATIONAL

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/02/15/national/journalists-legacy-shedding-light-on-societal-injustices/#.XMSd1OhKiUk
Nobuyuki Ogasawara's obituary was not carried by major media, but Nobuyuki Ogasawara left a distinctive mark on Japanese journalism.
Far from being a star journalist, he earned his living and secured his reporting expenses mainly as a writing course instructor at cram schools, but the freelancer produced numerous books and magazine articles on a broad range of social issues, from nuclear power and reproductive medicine to euthanasia.
Dying suddenly last July at age 64, he left a draft of an unfinished book that was completed by a close friend and published in December under the title “Reader on ‘Northern Territories Issues,’ ” a Q-and-A-style book on the decades-old territorial row between Japan and Russia
In the book, Ogasawara detailed the history of the four disputed islands off Hokkaido — Etorofu, Kunashiri, Shikotan and the Habomai islet group — from the 19th century to the present day, and stressed the need to involve the Ainu indigenous people in the territorial talks.
“It is undeniable that the Ainu are the indigenous people of the Kuril Islands. Japan should withdraw its assertion that the islands are lands descending from ancestors,” he argued in the book.
Yasushi Onuma, another freelance writer who finished the book by writing the last chapter, said Ogasawara “used to say the problematic issues for modern Japan are represented in the territorial row and the Ainu issues.”
Born in Tokyo, Ogasawara started his career as a reporter at the Hokkaido Shimbun in 1972 after graduating from Hokkaido University. After leaving the local daily 14 years later at the age of 39, he turned freelance.
“Growing up as a journalist in Hokkaido, he must have experienced limitations in working as an ‘in-house reporter’ and wanted to shed light on forgotten or undiscovered issues without worrying if they would draw the public eye,” said Onuma, who worked with Ogasawara at the daily.
As a freelancer, Ogasawara published his first book, “Salty River,” in 1990, in which he wrote about Ainu who had moved to the Tokyo metropolitan area from Hokkaido.
Crossing the Tsugaru Straits between Hokkaido and Honshu, locally called the “salty river,” to leave behind discrimination, they found life was not easy for them even in the big city, according to the book.
Ogasawara was prompted to interview them by controversial remarks made by then-Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone claiming that the intellectual level of Japanese people is high as Japan is an ethnically homogeneous nation. The comments drew criticism from Ainu people.
“It was his lifelong stance not to ignore injustice,” Onuma said.
Sharing the view, Jiro Takasu, president of Tokyo-based publisher Ryokufu Shuppan Inc., which has issued several of Ogasawara’s books, including the latest one, said, “He had a clear vision about how a journalist should be, and he forced himself to live in accordance with the ideal.”
In 2009, Ogasawara published a biography of a legendary editorialist at his old local paper, Teiichi Suda, who is known for arguing that Japan should have concluded an overall postwar peace treaty with the Allied Powers, including the Soviet Union and China, rather than signing a separate treaty only with the Western allies.
Through interviews with Suda’s family members and those close to him, Ogasawara presented a picture of an unyielding journalist, whom he considered an ideal model.
In the postscript of “Living Up to the Freedom of the Press,” Ogasawara said he wrote the book “so journalists, particularly young ones, and those who seek journalistic careers could reaffirm how journalism should be.”
Onuma remembers the day when he took a walk with Ogasawara on the beach near Ogasawara’s home in Chigasaki, Kanagawa Prefecture, around three months before his death.
“He did not jump at a job offer even if it was lucrative, although he experienced hardships,” Onuma said. “But he told me at that time he did not regret his life as a freelancer. I believe it was because he could embody the soundness of journalism.”
It has become more and more difficult for freelancers to make a living as journalists, as opportunities for publishing their works are decreasing at a time when major magazines have been closed down and book sales remain in a slump.
However, Onuma finds hope in Internet-based journalism.
“Quality reports on the Internet are sometimes picked up by mainstream media in the United States, and freelancers in Japan will be able to live up to their beliefs if such a trend expands in this country,” Onuma said. “A journalist should work under his or her own name, rather than under the name of a news agency he or she works for, as Ogasawara did.”
Ogasawara is survived by a wife, three children and a granddaughter.

Spencer Fayette Eddy

​​Scientology Roots Chapter Nine – L. Ron Hubbard’s Lifelong Intelligence Career
http://www.awn.bz/Ron_Hubbard_GroomedByMI6.html​

The British nobility has been working on a Grand Plan to make themselves the ruthless ruler of the entire world.
The rest of humanity does not agree to their idea that the British nobility should rule the world. They do not want to be obedient subjects, servants and slaves who live under the boot and say-so of the British aristocracy. Most men want to live as free men who live under their own will and say-so.
Thus the British slavemasters conducted mental and spiritual research. Their real interest in studying the human mind and spirit was to learn how to control men, so they could modify his behavior into what they want all men to be – willing subjects under rule by the British nobility.
​The Cecil family is one of the top British slavemaster families. Their family has been the head of British intelligence for over 400 years. Robert Cecil was the leader of an influential family called the Cecil Bloc. He was the head of British intelligence and he was a British Prime Minister.                                                             
Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil (Lord Salisbury)
One of his sisters had a son named Arthur Balfour. He was in the Cecil family and he was also a head of British intelligence and a Prime Minister of Britain.  
Arthur J. Balfou

Where Is Shelly Miscavige? New Details About Scientology Leader David Miscavige's Wife Who Hasn't Been Seen Publicly In Years
https://www.yourtango.com/2019321597/where-shelly-miscavige-new-details-missing-scientology-leader-wife
Entertainment And News February 12, 2019, Contributor Sarah Gangraw
Leah Remini EXPOSES Scientology 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6oYaMtJln0   
2,229,021 views Ken Ammi Published on Nov 1, 2015
Read More on this page 

November 8th, 2017- McClaughry
It was on June 11, 1940 that William Stephenson arrived in New York to start the British Security Coordination to get America into the war – WWII. He arrived aboard the SS Britannic with John Arthur Reed Pepper (his SIS man) and family in tow.
The first order of business was getting a “control” point for Secret Intelligence work. Someone who was fully aboard the British agenda and more importantly, would do whatever the British told him to do. Vincent Astor, with numerous familial connections into British high society, was chosen to hold that function while a more permanent arrangement was being worked on. (the COI, then the OSS)
.
Every step of the way was controlled by the British.

Psychopaths in our midst — what you should know
What does the emerging neuroscience of psychopathy tell us about how we should deal with it?

http://inlnews.com/USA_Past-Present_Future1.html  

By Pascal Wallisch, PhD     Posted on 17 November 2014
The most importantthing to know is that they exist.  Psychopaths are out there – ready, willing and able to take advantage of you without giving it a second thought, even if it were to ruin your life. Indeed, some psychopaths would consider it an added bonus if it did. Worse, you are unlikely to know what you are dealing with because you don't know what to look out for.
This is partly the fault of the media and the way psychopaths are represented in popular culture. The term "psychopath" likely evokes a vivid image of real or fictional characters like Charles Manson or Hannibal Lecter. When pressed for a definition, many people would consider someone who is a sadistic serial killer and criminal mastermind with a deranged and twisted mind who also takes pleasure in the suffering he inflicts as the prototype that defines the condition.
One implication of this definition is that psychopaths must be exceedingly rare and not really something to worry about in everyday life. This is perhaps comforting, but just like real drowning looks nothing like drowning on the big screen, popular imagination harbors a lot of misconceptions when it comes to psychopaths. To make matters worse, psychopaths deliberately work on maintaining a "mask of sanity." They know they have to conceal their nature in order to more effectively manipulate and exploit you, which is why most victims of psychopaths are blindsided by psychopathic behavior.
Fortunately, science made a lot of progress in understanding and detecting psychopaths in the past century.

What psychopathy is – and what it's not
Elsevier Connect Contributor

Dr. Wallisch is the author of MATLAB for Neuroscientists, 2nd Edition, published by Elsevier. The text serves as the only comprehensive study manual and teaching resource for MATLAB, the globally accepted standard for scientific computing, in the neurosciences and psychology.
Book signing at Neuroscience 2014
Dr. Pascal Wallisch will be signing the second edition of MATLAB for Neuroscientists from 11:30 am to 1 pm today in Elsevier booth #115 at the Society for Neuroscience annual meeting (#SfN14) in Washington, DC.
The first thing to understand about psychopaths is that the condition is ironically named. The term literally translates to "suffering souls," but while psychopathy objectively does tend to cause a lot of difficulties and strife in the lives of psychopaths, they are unlikely to be distressed by this. Instead, they are generally the ones who are dishing out the suffering, and are doing so without losing much sleep over it. Unlike most mental or neurological diseases, it is not really accurate to say that psychopaths are "suffering" from psychopathy. Generally, they are not actually suffering – rather they make others suffer for their sins. This is why psychopaths don't typically seek treatment for their condition. Psychopaths are usually only diagnosed if and when their behavior is so far outside of the bounds of societal norms that they end up in prison, which about two-thirds of them eventually do. This makes it hard to estimate the prevalence of psychopathy, but experts estimate that between one in 100 to 200 males – the condition seems to be more rare in females – would qualify for a diagnosis of psychopathy if they were evaluated. This rate implies that they are common enough to worry about because you are likely to know a few of them personally, whether you recognize that they are psychopaths or not. Crucially, they cause far more than their fair share of suffering.
So it is critical to understand what psychopathy is and is not. Importantly, while the terms sound similar – and screenwriters like to conflate the condition for dramatic effect – psychopathy has nothing to do with psychosis. Psychopaths generally do not suffer from hallucinations, are not acting in ways that are patently irrational, nor are they out of touch with physical reality.

Traits of psychopaths – and what it's like to be one
What seems to be central to the condition is a dramatically muted emotional affect. While there is controversy in the field about how this manifests specifically, the signs of disordered affect are everywhere. For instance, some studies show that psychopaths do not exhibit normal physiological responses (e.g., increase in sweat or change in heart rate) when looking at disturbing images of atrocities. Some experts maintain that it is next to impossible to startle a psychopath or win a staring contest with one.
The problem with this lack of normal emotional affect is that most of us use it to guide our social behavior. We need emotions like empathy or guilt in order to develop a moral compass, to distinguish what is right from wrong when it comes to treating others. Indeed, psychopaths don't seem to be big on compassion or regret. Studies show that when asked to assess what feels more wrong – kicking a baby or kicking a sack of rice – psychopaths tend to treat either scenario with an equal degree of equanimity.
Of course, this is inconceivable to most of us. Generally speaking, most people expect others to feel and act more or less as they themselves would. However, in the case of psychopaths, this heuristic fails; non-psychopaths can hardly conceive ever doing anything remotely like the things that psychopaths do all the time without any qualms whatsoever.
A metaphor that can help to grasp what it feels like to be a psychopath might be to consider how you would feel about spilling milk. It's unfortunate, but nothing to cry over. And of course one has to break a couple of eggs to make an omelet – that is just how things are. Psychopaths treat people like you would treat objects – things to be manipulated for their personal gain with no conceivable ethical or moral dimension.
As a consequence, the psychopath exhibits a profound indifference to the suffering his actions cause others.
The implications of such a condition are predictably dramatic; freed from the ethical shackles imposed on behavior by conscience, the psychopath pursues his antisocial agenda of personal gain with abandon, uninhibited and untroubled.
This, in turn, leads to a wide variety of behavioral tendencies that can be captured by the tests experts use to diagnose psychopathy in individuals. These sound a lot like blood tests (e.g., PCL-R, which stands for Psychopathy Checklist - Revised), but actually check behavioral traits such as lack of responsibility and remorse, pathological lying, manipulativeness and cunning, sexual promiscuity, impulsivity and irresponsibility, superficial affect and charm, criminal behavior and so on.
While the behavioral manifestations of the psychopathic lifestyle can be bewilderingly diverse, they are all consistent with a disturbed emotional affect as the root cause. Neuroimaging studies suggest that this is indeed the case, as psychopaths show dramatic anatomical and functional differences – relative to controls – particularly in brain regions that together form the paralimbic system, which has been associated with and implicated in emotional processing.
So while psychopathy is classically considered as a personality disorder, it really is a brain disorder, specifically a disorder of emotional circuitry that deals with interpersonal relations. As such, it fits with a number of other conditions that we now recognize as biological in nature, but are manifesting socially or behaviorally.

Sociopath vs. psychopath
This dual nature poses a challenge for society. It also clarifies a common confusion regarding the difference between sociopaths and psychopaths. While some use these words interchangeably, "sociopath" is an ideological term that became fashionable in the 1970s, and which implies that this condition is mostly or even solely determined by dysfunctional social conditions. In light of the evidence that psychopathy involves clearly specified neural systems, which suggests that the condition is biological at its core, there really might be no such thing as a sociopath. Psychopathy appears increasingly less as a character flaw and more like a brain defect.

Nature vs. nurture
Of course, the question whether psychopaths are born or made is very much unresolved, as the etiology of the condition is still unclear. Most likely, it involves a combination of both genetic and social factors. On the one hand, it is increasingly apparent that signs of psychopathy – both behavioral and neural – can already be present very early in childhood, suggesting that there might be a strong genetic component to the condition. On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence that environmental factors also play a role. For instance, an uninvolved or absent father or physical neglect in childhood are strong predictors of psychopathic traits in adulthood. It is even hard to tease apart genetic and environmental components. For instance, in the example above, it is conceivable that uninvolved fathers are uninvolved because they are psychopaths as well. Obviously, it is ethically unthinkable to do experiments to resolve this question conclusively. As is usually true for complex neural-psycho-social conditions, it is likely the case that a combination of genetic predispositions and environmental triggers underlies the development of adult psychopathy.

How should society deal with psychopaths?
But regardless of cause, plenty of psychopaths exist right now and we have to deal with them, both as a society and individually.

It is perhaps not surprising that the psychopathic lifestyle eventually leads most psychopaths to prison. However, societal notions of justice were conceived in a time before we understood anything about brain disorders, so they are still not well suited to address them. For instance, the criminal justice system does presume that people can tell right from wrong and are equal before the law.

But what if psychopaths don't - or can't - care about what is right and wrong and what if the brains of psychopaths are demonstrably different from those of the rest of the population?

The current default societal response to psychopathy – imprisonment – seems a bit naïve, as it does not suit the peculiarities of the condition.


While going to prison is a deeply traumatic experience for most, all accounts suggest that psychopaths don't seem to be particularly bothered by the occasion. Worse, it seems to have no curative effect – statistically, psychopaths have a probability to re-offend that approaches certainty.

Given their mental makeup, this is not surprising. To summarize, prison seems to have no deterrent, punitive or curative effect on psychopaths, which is why it can be considered woefully inadequate as a treatment option.


This is another irony of psychopathy – those who are most likely to end up in prison are least likely to be affected by it.
Whether psychopaths can be reformed at all is an open question. Apart from prison, traditional forms of therapy are neither sought by psychopaths, nor is there any evidence that they work. However, there are promising new intervention models that go beyond punishment; for instance, "decompression" that seek to re-form the kinds of psychosocial bonds that the psychopath never made in his childhood. The jury on whether these interventions work in the long term is still out, but we – as a society – need to start taking psychopathy and its underlying brain pathology seriously. Psychopaths can inflict quite a bit of suffering on their path to prison; the annual economic damage in the US alone is estimated to be in the hundreds of billions of dollars.
Also, there is the case of the "successful psychopath" that does not end up in prison. If a psychopath is skilled enough to avoid this fate, he can utilize his natural ruthlessness to single-mindedly go after and achieve his self-aggrandizing goals. While it is not true that – as the characteristically hyperbolic media narrative would have it – 10 percent of Wall Street executives qualify as psychopaths, there is no question that psychopaths are overrepresented in leading positions in many fields. Power and recklessness is a toxic mix, and the fallout from that combination makes for riveting narratives that sell newspapers on a daily basis.

Society will have to come to terms with this one way or the other, as it is getting ever more vulnerable to psychopaths.

In a way, it is a great time to be a psychopath, as society is ever more fractured which allows for reputation management and the emergence of a sharing economy (Craigslist, AirBnB, et al) critically relies on trust but provides ideal hunting grounds for psychopaths to exploit unsuspecting victims.
Maybe part of the solution is more research; the science of psychopathy is only now coming into its own as the condition has been understudied for a long time. Perhaps this is not surprising, given that the disorder is inherently paradoxical in nature. Most cultures sharply distinguish the archetypes of victims – who are deserving of our sympathy and compassion – from perpetrators, who are only deserving of our scorn and punishment. But what if there is a condition – psychopathy – where unsuffering victims are remorseless perpetrators that cause a lot of suffering at the same time? Society might ultimately be unsympathetic, but needs a better understanding of psychopathy for sheer self-protection.
As neuroscience progresses, society will increasingly have to come to grips with biological disorders that affect the brain and but manifest socially and behaviorally. In the case of psychopathy, it does so in an extremely detrimental and antisocial fashion. Our institutions and legal theory will have to catch up with our scientific understanding of these conditions and disorders.

How can you protect yourself?
Meanwhile, what can you do as an individual?

Most importantly, awareness of the condition is helpful, as detection is critical. The psychopath next door is unlikely to be a chainsaw-wielding killer – given the psychopathic propensity to cloak their tendencies – but can do a lot of damage to your life all the same. If you consider a normal emotional response central to the human experience, it is critical to understand that there are extremely cold-blooded aliens in human form among us.
There needs to be no value judgment attached to this – think of psychopathy as the moral equivalent of color blindness. While you might not be able to relate to psychopaths, you can still adapt your behavior. And as dealing with a psychopath can be life ruining, the only way to win might be not to play. Unless you happen to be the bigger psychopath.

Pascal Wallisch, PhD
Dr. Wallisch is the author of MATLAB for Neuroscientists, 2nd Edition, published by Elsevier. The text serves as the only comprehensive study manual and teaching resource for MATLAB, the globally accepted standard for scientific computing, in the neurosciences and psychology.
Dr. Pascal Wallisch(@Pascallisch) received his PhD from the University of Chicago, did postdoctoral research at the Center for Neural Science at New York University, and currently serves as Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychology at NYU. His research interests are at the intersection of psychology and neuroscience, specifically cognitive and computational neuroscience. His work focuses on motion perception, autism and the appraisal of film.

His blog is Pascal's Pensées
Scientist Frank Olson was drugged with LSD and 'murdered by CIA'
Frank Olson’s family sues CIA, decades after scientist’s mysterious death
Sons say spy agency killed researcher after he unwittingky took LSD in 1953

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/50003125/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/family-sues-cia-decades-after-scientists-mysterious-death/#.XKH2HJhKiUk
By Frederic J. Frommer
AP Associated Press 28th November 2012
A declassified document describing MK-ULTRA
Biochemist Frank Olson, shown here in a 1952 file picture, died in 1953 after falling from a hotel window in Manhattan. Olson's family is suing the federal government over his death.

Frank Olson, American bacteriologist
Frank Rudolph Olson was an American bacteriologist, biological warfare scientist, and Central Intelligence Agency employee who worked at Camp Detrick in Maryland

November 28, 1953, Manhattan, New York City, New York, United States
By Raf Sanchez, New York
8:33PM GMT 28 Nov 2012
Scientist Frank Olson was drugged with LSD and 'murdered by CIA'
A US government scientist was drugged by CIA agents and then thrown to his death from the 13th floor of a Manhattan hotel after he learned about secret torture sites in Europe, according to a lawsuit filed by his family.

WASHINGTON — The sons of a Cold War scientist who plunged to his death in 1953 several days after unwittingly taking LSD in a CIA mind-control experiment sued the federal government Wednesday. They claimed that the CIA murdered their father, Frank Olson, by pushing him from a 13th-story window of a hotel — not, as the CIA says, that he jumped to his death.
Sons Eric and Nils Olson of Frederick, Md., sought unspecified compensatory damages in the lawsuit filed in federal court, but their lawyer, Scott D. Gilbert, said they also want to see a broad range of documents related to Olson's death and other matters that they say the CIA has withheld from them since the death.
Olson was a bioweapons expert at Fort Detrick, the Army's biological weapons research center in Maryland. Their lawsuit claims the CIA killed Olson when he developed misgivings after witnessing extreme interrogations in which they allege the CIA committed murder using biological agents Olson had developed.
The CIA had a program in the 1950s and '60s called MK-ULTRA, which involved brainwashing and administering experimental drugs like LSD to unsuspecting individuals. The project was investigated by Congress in the 1970s.
Olson consumed a drink laced with LSD by CIA agents on Nov. 19, 1953, the suit says. Later that month, after being taken to New York City purportedly for a "psychiatric" consultation, Olson plunged to his death.
At the time — when Eric and Nils Olson were 9 and 5 years old, respectively — the CIA said he died in an accident and did not divulge to his family that Olsen had been given LSD.
But in 1975, a commission headed by Vice President Nelson Rockefeller released a report on CIA abuses that included a reference to an Army scientist who had jumped from a New York hotel days after being slipped LSD in 1953. Family members threatened to sue, but President Gerald Ford invited the family to the White House, assuring them they would be given all the government's information. CIA Director William Colby handed over documents and the family accepted a $750,000 settlement to avert a lawsuit.
In an email, CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood said that while the agency doesn't comment on matters before U.S. courts, "CIA activities related to MK-ULTRA have been thoroughly investigated over the years, and the agency cooperated with each of those investigations." She noted that tens of thousands of pages related to the program have been released to the public.
In a statement, Eric Olson said that the CIA has not given a complete picture of what happened to his father.
"The evidence shows that our father was killed in their custody," he said. "They have lied to us ever since, withholding documents and information, and changing their story when convenient."

A declassified document describing MK-ULTRA

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9710121/Scientist-Frank-Olson-was-drugged-with-LSD-and-murdered-by-CIA.html

Eric Olson composes his thoughts Thursday, Aug. 8, 2002,  during a news conference at his house in Braddock Heights, Md. concerning the death of his father
,Fort Detrick scientist Frank Olson 


The sons of Dr Frank Olson claim that their father was murdered in 1953 after he discovered that his biological research was being used to torture and kill suspects in Norway and West Germany.
After raising concerns about the killings, Dr Olson was allegedly given LSD in a glass of brandy and then executed by the CIA, triggering what his family claims is "a multi-decade cover-up that continues to this day".
The scientist began working with the spy agency in the 1950s and focused on biological weapons that could be transmitted through the air.
According to the lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Washington DC, he traveled to research sites in Norway, France and West Germany as well as Porton Down, a British government facility in Wiltshire.
During his travels in Europe he "witnessed extreme interrogations in which the CIA committed murder using biological agents that Dr Olson had developed".

Related Articles
Petraeus in shock resignation from CIA as FBI probe reveals affair 
09 Nov 2012  Early CIA report blamed militants for Benghazi attack 
19 Oct 2012  British extremist 'behind attack on CIA base in Afghanistan' 


11 Nov 2012
The lawsuit gives no details about the reported deaths in Europe and the Ministry of Defence would not comment on Dr Olson's activities in Britain.
A MoD spokesman said that Porton Down had been used to develop countermeasures to biological weapons and "part of this work included ongoing collaboration with our international allies, including the US".
Dr Olson was apparently shaken by what he had seen and returned to the US resigned to resolve from the agency. On November 19, 1953 he was taken to a secret meeting Deep Creek Lake, Maryland, where he was given LSD hidden in a glass of brandy.
Days later he was brought to New York for "psychiatric treatment" by CIA officials who allegedly told his family that he had become unstable and violent.
At 2.30am on November 28, Dr Olson went through the window of the Statler Hotel's room 1018a, which he was allegedly sharing with a CIA doctor, and died in the street below.
The CIA initially claimed his death was an accident but in the 1970s, as its activities were investigated in the wake of the Watergate scandal, it admitted that he had been drugged and said that his death was a suicide.
Dr Olson's family was paid a settlement and invited to the White House by President Gerald Ford, who apologised for the government's concealment of the drugging.

However, the family remained unsatisfied with the government's account and in 1996 exhumed Dr Olson's body and claimed to have found evidence of a blow to the head suffered before his fall.
Prosecutors in New York re-opened an investigation and although they were unable to turn up new evidence decided to change Dr Olson's cause of death from "suicide" to "unknown".
The family are now suing the government, claiming that the CIA is continuing to conceal files relating to their father's death.
“The evidence shows that our father was killed in their custody. They have lied to us ever since, withholding documents and information, and changing their story when convenient," said Eric Olson.
A CIA spokeswoman said that its covert programmes of the 1950s had been "thoroughly investigated" and that "tens of thousands of pages related to the program have been declassified and released to the public.”
Eric Olson composes his thoughts Thursday, Aug. 8, 2002, during a news conference at his house in Braddock Heights, Md. concerning the death of his father, Fort Detrick scientist Frank Olson Photo: AP
Scientist Frank Olson was drugged with LSD and 'murdered by CIA'
A US government scientist was drugged by CIA agents and then thrown to his death from the 13th floor of a Manhattan hotel after he learned about secret torture sites in Europe, according to a lawsuit filed by his family.

In Netflix's 'Wormwood', the CIA Murders Frank Olson With LSD

https://www.inverse.com/article/35958-frank-olson-wormood-netflix-cia-mk-ultra

In 
1953, the United States government told the family of scientist Frank Olson that their patriarch had fallen from a hotel window to his death, a tragic suicide induced by work stress. Twenty-two years later, the CIA was forced to admit that its agents had given Olson a glass of Cointreau spiked with LSD immediately before dying, and his death was reclassified as a drug-induced suicide.

The Olson family, however, doesn’t believe this summary of events. They believe that the CIA was guilty of murder.
These real events make up the plot of Wormwood, an upcoming six-part series on Netflix that blends narrative and documentary filmmaking, directed by Errol Morris. In the first trailer for Wormwood, released Monday, the series is described as a telling of the “true story of the CIA, LSD, mind control, and the death of a family man.”
In Wormwood, Peter Sarsgaard plays Olson, a bioweapons expert who worked within a special operations division of the Army’s Biological Laboratory, which worked closely with the CIA. Olson’s family says that in 1953, he went on a work trip to Europe to visit biological and chemical weapon research facilities, where he allegedly witnessed CIA-backed interrogations that used biological agents to coerce subjects, which he found intensely disturbing.
Shortly after, Olson attended a work retreat in Deep Creek Lake, Maryland, where CIA officials, including the head of MK-ULTRA, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, were in attendance. In 1975, the American public discovered that MK-ULTRA was a secret CIA project that, between 1953 and 1964, conducted unethical experiments on unknowing subjects with the goal of achieving mind control. Many of these tests included administering LSD on unsuspecting civilians, which the CIA later acknowledged “made little scientific sense.”
It was in Deep Creek Lake that Olson became one of the unsuspecting victims of MK-ULTRA. There, CIA agents secretly slipped LSD into his drink, as a scene in Wormwood’s trailer shows. Olson was told, 20 minutes after the fact, that his drink had been laced, and then he left the retreat in an agitated state. On November 24, he told a colleague and his wife that he planned to resign. But before that could happen, the CIA forced him to attend a “psychiatric evaluation” four days later. On November 28, he was found on the sidewalk after emerging from the window of the Statler Hotel in New York.

A declassified document describing MK-ULTRA

In 1975, the Washington Post revealed that a federally commissioned investigation into the situation found that “a civilian employee of the Department of the Army unwittingly took LSD as part of a Central Intelligence Agency test.” During a joint hearing on MK-ULTRA conducted in 1977, Senator Edward Kennedy acknowledged that “At least one death, that of Dr. Olson, resulted from these activities.”
Olson’s family has cried murder ever since. In 2012, they filed a lawsuit accusing the CIA of a cover-up, but in 2013 the case was dismissed because it was filed too late after the event took place. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, however, did acknowledge that “the public record supports many of the allegations that follow, far-fetched as they may sound.”
What actually happened to Olson, as well as his family’s continued quest to reveal the truth, will play out in Wormwood. The series will be released on December 15.
See below: The CIA Drugged Thousands of U.S. and Canadian Citizens
ast week, NASA released an ultra high definition video of the International Space Station, but many people may have trouble experiencing it as it was filmed. It’s not because of space radiation or mystery holes, but because of something far more Earthly.
The video, which was created in partnership with the European Space Agency, shows the crew of the ISS conducting a range of scientific experiments, all in unprecedented 8K. But the video’s uniqueness is also its downfall: Most computer monitors, even the very largest of desktop monitors, aren’t big enough to show 8K video in all its splendor. To put it another way, that’s a resolution of 7,680 pixels wide x 4,320 pixels tall, whereas the typical high-def YouTube video is 1,920 x 1,080 pixels.
1951, Project Artichoke
23 May 2016 No Comments

https://www.timeofreason.com/united-states-government-operations-in-mind-control-and-human-experimentation/projectartichokefrankolson_thumb/
Project ARTICHOKE (also referred to as Operation ARTICHOKE) was a CIA project that researched interrogation methods and arose from Project BLUEBIRD on August 20, 1951, run by the CIA Office of Scientific Intelligence.
[1] A memorandum by Richard Helms to CIA director Allen Dulles indicated Artichoke became Project MKULTRA on April 13, 1953. [2]
The project studied hypnosis, forced morphine addiction (and subsequent forced withdrawal), and the use of other chemicals, among other methods, to produce amnesia and other vulnerable states in subjects.

ARTICHOKE was an offensive program of mind control that gathered together the intelligence divisions of the US Army, Navy, Air Force, and FBI. In addition, the scope of the project was outlined in a memo dated January 1952 that stated, "Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self-preservation?"
A 22 January 1954 CIA memo shows that the Agency also pondered using hypnotized assassination.
The report’s central question was, “Can an individual of [redacted] descent be made to perform an act of attempted
assassination involuntarily under the influence of ARTICHOKE?” 
According to a subsequent CIA report, “ARTICHOKE is the Agency
cryptonym for the study and/or use of ‘special’ interrogation methods that have been known to include the use of drugs and chemicals, hypnosis, and ‘total isolation,’ a form of psychological harassment.”
Later, the document stipulated that this assassination attempt would be “against a prominent [redacted] politician or if necessary, against an American official.” 
After “American official” there was a hand written asterisk. 
At the end of the document, next to another handwritten asterisk, the words “simulated only” were handwritten.
According to the memo, CIA operatives would test this theory on a foreign national (his country of origin is redacted) who was once an Agency asset, but had since stopped cooperating.
During this program, Dr. Frank Olson, a US Army biological weapons researcher, was given the drug LSD without his knowledge. At 2.30 am on November 28, 1953, Dr Olson went through the window of the Statler Hotel’s room 1018a, which he was allegedly sharing with a CIA doctor, and died in the street below. The government declared his death a suicide. However, the family remained unsatisfied with the government’s account and in 1996 exhumed Dr Olson’s body and claimed to have found evidence of a blow to the head suffered before his fall.
In 2012 his sons filed a lawsuit against the US Government, claiming that their father was murdered in 1953 after he traveled to Europe and “witnessed extreme interrogations in which the CIA committed murder using biological agents that Dr Olson had developed”.

https://historyarchive.wordpress.com/2015/09/10/looking-back-1953-cia-doses-men-with-lsd-at-deep-creek-lake-part-1/
Time Will Tell
See how interesting history can be
LOOKING BACK 1953: CIA doses men with LSD at Deep Creek Lake (Part 1)
September 10, 2015 by jimrada
Dr. Frank R. Olson, a former biochemist on July 10, 1952 at Fort Detrick, allegedly committed suicide in 1953, when he jumped or fell from the tenth floor of a New York building. Olson’s family is suing the CIA in regard to the death. (AP Photo)

Two bottles of Cointreau sat on the table in front of Frank Olson. Both were open. Both were the same. He reached out for one of the bottles to pour himself an after-dinner drink. He was relaxing in a cabin with other men who had been forced to attend a three-day retreat at Deep Creek Lake from 11/18-20.
He hadn’t wanted to attend. He was having doubts about the ethicality of his work. He didn’t need to about the results of the work in which he was involved at Camp Detrick, in Frederick. He needed to think and clear his mind.
He knew the men he was sharing the large cabin on the lake with. They were members of the Special Operations Division and the CIA. Vincent Ruwet, Olson’s division chief and friend, had picked him up at his house and they had driven west to find this somewhat isolated cabin. It was a large, two-story rental cabin, off of Route 219 about 30 yards from Deep Creek Lake and 100 yards from the nearest neighbor.
The invitation to the “Deep Creek Rendezvous” said that a cover story had been given for the meeting. “CAMOUFLAGE: Winter meeting of script writers, editors, authors, lecturers, sports magazines.”
Olson believed they were there to talk about the joint projects of the Special Operations Division and CIA involving things like biological warfare and using drugs for mind control.

Unbeknownst to Olson, this was also a camouflage story to get him and others to the cabin for an experiment.
The men enjoyed a hearty dinner on Thursday, November 19, and then settled down in the cabin’s living room for after-dinner drinks. Robert Lashbrook, a CIA employee and one of the attendees, poured drinks for eight of the men present. He served the drinks and then poured himself and Sidney Gottlieb drinks from a separate bottle, although there was still liqueur in the first. If it struck anyone as odd or if anyone even noticed, no one remarked on it. Olson took the drink offered him. It was a simple choice, but one that would cost him his life.
He drank the Cointreau and then lost himself in his own thoughts. Sometime between then and Friday afternoon, Olson and the men were told their drinks had been dosed with LSD, according to the Church Committee report.
When Olson returned home that evening, his wife, Alice, “sensed something was wrong the moment he walked in the door. There was a stiffness in the way he kissed her hellow and held her. Like he was doing something mechanical, devoid of any meaning or affection,” H. P. Albarelli wrote in A Terrible Mistake.
Olson’s thoughts now were definitely elsewhere. Later that evening, he admitted to her, “I’ve made a terrible mistake.”
On Monday morning at 7:30 a.m., Olson was waiting for Ruwet when he arrived. Olson admitted he doubts about the work he was doing and said that he wanted to resign.
Olson told his wife later, “I talked to Vin. He said that I didn’t make a mistake. Everything is fine. I’m not going to resign.
The next day, Ruwet and Lashbrook convinced Olson to see a psychiatric doctor in New York. Actually, he was meeting with Harold Abramson, an allergist-pediatrician, who was working with the CIA.
Lashbrook and Olson shared a hotel room on the 13th floor of the Statler Hotel. Early in the morning of November 28, a loud crashing noise woke him up. According to the CIA, Olson threw himself out of the window, committing suicide.
The truth turned out to be something far darker and disturbing.

They used abreactive therapy on the soldiers, followed up by drugs and electroshock “therapy”.

Puerto Rico is one of the Caribbean Sea countries

Aldous Huxley

October 5, 1937 – John W. Campbell is hired at Astounding Science Fiction magazine.
March 1938 – Propaganda was so important to British Intelligence, that a special section was created for propaganda.

It was funded by MI6 and headed by Sir Campbell Stuart.

L Ron Hubbard aboard the Mariana Maru – he is 17 years old

Shelly and David Miscavige.

Colin Campbell Stuart

The Astors held regular weekend parties and the group that attended them was known as ‘the Cliveden set’

The sluice constructed by Carper and Hubbard

When he was trying to explain his radio-direction finding work while in Ketchikan, he is recorded in a radio program giving the explanation that:
…doing radio experimental work on beacon signals for the Navy Department, Fisher Research Laboratories, and the Cape Cod Instrument Company, I chanced to have some radio direction finders of high sensitivity. (Church of Scientology site “Clearing the Airwaves”; history of KGBU )
He didn’t “chance” to have such equipment. He was given it specifically for his trip and his real purposes there. Astor had been provided one for a similar intelligence mission that he had done where he was locating Japanese radio stations in the Marshall Islands.

​​​​​​​Behind bars: India's 'Diamond King' Nirav Modi's fall from grace
Nirav Modi’s rise from a $70-a-month trainee to the biggest player in India’s multibillion-dollar diamond industry was swift. But now he’s in prison, accused of fraud on a truly massive scale.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/behind-bars-india-s-diamond-king-nirav-modi-s-fall-from-grace-20190423-p51gf4.html
WORLD   ASIA   GOOD WEEKEND

 

 

 

Modi’s 12.29-carat Golconda diamond necklace.

 

 


Nirav Modi with actor Naomi Watts at the opening of his New York boutique in 2015. CREDIT:GETTY IMAGES

 

 

 

Model/actor Rosie Huntington-Whiteley at another Modi store-opening in London in 2016. CREDIT:ALAMY


Nirav Modi’s rise from a $70-a-month trainee to the biggest player in India’s multibillion-dollar diamond industry was swift. But now he’s in prison, accused of fraud on a truly massive scale.


Beneath the filth, flies and excrement, the laneways of Mumbai's Zaveri Bazaar are literally paved with gold. Early each morning, dozens of scavengers known as niarewalas descend on India's largest bullion and jewellery market armed with brooms and dustpans to sweep up tiny flecks of the precious metal and, if they're lucky, a carelessly discarded diamond or precious stone. Nothing is spared their scrutiny, not even the sludge deposited at the bottom of rusty drainpipes. Accumulated in the putrid sediment is gold dust washed off the hands and bodies of craftsmen whose tiny workshops in century-old tenements make custom jewellery for buyers in the Middle East, Europe, North America and Asia.

About 95 per cent of the world's diamonds pass through Indian trading hubs like this one, on their way to nearby cutting and polishing centres, the trade dominated by one small and tight-knit community, the Palanpuri Jains. There are fortunes to be made in Zaveri Bazaar, whether you are an outcast scavenger or a diamantaire peddling high-carat accoutrements to India's rising class of super-rich Bollygarchs.


 
 




Bollywood star Sonam Kapoor with Nirav Modi at the launch of his jewellery collection in Dubai in 2011. CREDIT:GETTY IMAGES

Until February last year, the cherub-like face of Nirav Modi stared out from billboards here and elsewhere in India's financial capital. The country's leading diamond retailer and designer had his name on a dozen boutiques locally and around the world, and boasted of his dream to create a global retail empire of 100 stores by 2025. Among the A-listers at the September 2015 launch of his first American store, on New York's Madison Avenue, were Australian actor Naomi Watts, Indian-Australian actor and model Lisa Haydon and Canadian model Coco Rocha, along with Donald Trump jnr and his wife Vanessa.
More than anyone else, the man who became known as India's "Diamond King" and whose bespoke creations graced the necklines and earlobes of the some of the world's top film stars and models personified the dynamism and promise of the new India that his namesake (but no relation), Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is so keen to project. The country whose fabled Golconda mines gave the world bejewelled maharajahs and stones such as the Koh-i-noor – one of the largest cut diamonds in the world and part of the British Crown Jewels – finally had a brand ambassador who could compete with European luxury companies such as Cartier, Bulgari and Van Cleef & Arpels. "It's all about putting India on the world map," boasted Modi. "And for that I am doing my bit."
Today, the "jeweller to the stars", as he was frequently called, is behind bars after a year-long Interpol-led manhunt that led to his arrest in central London on March 19. Together with his diamond polisher uncle, Mehul Choksi, he is accused of conniving with junior tellers to defraud the Mumbai branch of India's second-largest state-run bank, the Punjab National Bank, of billions of dollars. Scotland Yard made the arrest on behalf of Indian authorities, who have asked for his extradition. Two weeks earlier, his whereabouts were exposed when Britain's Telegraph newspaper doorstopped him near a flat he was renting in Soho. They found him sporting a handlebar moustache and an ostrich-skin jacket.
The "Great Indian Bank Robbery", as Indian media outlets have dubbed it, has shaken the country's $US35-billion diamond sector to the core. From the small family-run concerns of Zaveri Bazaar to the dealers at Mumbai's glistening Bharat Diamond Bourse, the largest in the world, many traders fear that an industry that largely ran on trust might find its reputation on par with that of the scavengers sweeping the streets outside their shops. Modi came from the Jain community of Palanpur, a small town in the western state of Gujarat. And it is among the Palanpuri Jains that the fallout of his alleged crimes is being most acutely felt


 





Mumbai’s jewellery market, the Zaveri Bazaar. CREDIT:GETTY IMAGES
The alleged modus operandi behind the biggest bank fraud in Indian history was revealed in a July 2018 dossier prepared for the US Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York, which is investigating the activities of three of Modi's American jewellery companies. According to the 165-page dossier, Modi and his co-conspirators illegally borrowed approximately $US4 billion over a period of seven years by manufacturing sham transactions purportedly to "import" diamonds and other gems into India from trading hubs such as Belgium's Antwerp, using a web of more than 20 secretly controlled shell entities.
Diamonds sold to or purchased from these entities "were routinely shipped out the same day or within days after arrival, without ever being opened or inspected by employees to ascertain the contents of the packets", the dossier states. Certain high-value diamonds were bought and sold multiple times at often wildly inflated prices in order to create the appearance of millions of dollars worth of legitimate transactions and to facilitate the movement of funds.
Fraudulently obtained letters of undertaking (LOUs), or guarantees under which Indian banks allow their customers to obtain short-term credit from another bank's foreign branch to facilitate import transactions into India, were also used. It was only when one of the bank employees allegedly involved in the scam retired that the seven-year-long operation was exposed. US authorities are also believed to be considering extraditing Modi.

Punjab National Bank shares plummeted when the scandal broke in February 2018, as did confidence in India's dysfunctional state-run banking sector, which has lost billions of dollars in recent years from investor frauds. Screaming matches erupted in India's parliament, with opposition parties accusing the government of colluding with the diamantaire to allow him to flee the country.

Modi had left India early the previous month bound for Britain, the bolthole of choice for business barons wanted by Indian authorities for tax evasion, fraud and other related crimes. Modi's Indian assets, including the flagship stores that bore his name, a fleet of luxury cars and several factories, have been seized by the authorities. Last month, his art collection was auctioned by India's tax authority, raising $US8 million. Thousands of his employees have been laid off.

Modi's Indian lawyer, Vijay Aggarwal, has successfully defended some of India's largest corporate fraud cases. Described as "pugilistic, pugnacious and aggressive" by his critics, his courtroom victories include securing the acquittal of several high-profile businessmen and politicians accused of defrauding the state of a staggering $US26 billion in the allocation of second generation or 2G telecom licences.
Aggarwal, who did not respond to interview requests by Good Weekend, told a Mumbai court in January that India's Enforcement Directorate had tried to "falsely implicate" his client by giving a "colour of criminality" to "usual civil banking transactions" to camouflage the bank's failures in connection with the alleged scam. Modi's defence team is expected to argue that the charges against him are politically motivated. India is in the middle of a six-week-long national election, with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party's alleged connivance with corrupt business figures a major issue.
For a man whose number was once on the speed-dial of many of Mumbai's A-list, Modi's fall from grace has been dramatic. The 48-year-old grew up in Belgium, where his father, Deepak Modi, ran a business trading in uncut diamonds. He attended the Antwerp International School, where he dreamt of becoming a music conductor, but instead enrolled in Wharton business college at the University of Pennsylvania.
In 1990, he moved from the US to Mumbai to begin a decade-long apprenticeship with his uncle, Mehul Choksi, learning everything from polishing diamonds to selling them. He would later say that he worked 12 hours a day, six and a half days a week, for 3500 rupees ($70) a month. By 1999, he had raised enough capital to launch his own company, Firestar Diamond. Over the next few years, Firestar went on to raise hundreds of millions of dollars to acquire firms such as US-based jewellery retailer Samuels and the De Beers-owned Nakshatra brand, which had 480 stores in India.

 

 


Modi’s uncle and co-accused, Mehul Choksi, with Bollywood actress Urvashi Sharma. CREDIT:AFP

When the global financial crisis hit in 2008 and the value of large diamonds fell by up to 40 per cent, Modi took the opportunity to buy diamonds at cheap prices, including $15 million worth of rare pink diamonds from Argyle in Australia's Kimberley. In 2009, he switched his main supplier from De Beers to Russia's Alrosa, just as the global diamond giant's output plummeted and the Russian company's rose.
His move from retail to design came in 2009, when a friend asked him to make a pair of earrings for her. After months of persuasion, he relented. "I can actually look back to [this] single moment that propelled me into starting my eponymous brand," Modi told Forbes in 2017. He had at last found his calling.
His big breakthrough as a designer came in 2010, when a necklace set with a flawless pear-shaped 12.29-carat Golconda diamond was featured on the cover of a Christie's auction catalogue.
The piece went under the hammer in Hong Kong for $US3.6 million, nearly a million dollars more than its asking price. A year later, he launched his eponymous Nirav Modi brand, a line that would blend the best of Eastern and Western designs. "All of my jewellery marries my Indian roots with my international exposure and love of art, nature, travel and poetry," he once said. "Every collection has its own unique story to tell." His target buyer was the "woman of global sensibilities". His focus was on delivering pieces that would go as well with a gown as with a sari. "The jewellery should move with the woman, it should be a second skin."
No expense was spared in achieving his dream of becoming one of the world's top five luxury jewellery brands. Millions of dollars were spent on two state-of-the-art factories in India to manufacture his designs. Showrooms fitted out by Spanish artist-designer Jaime Hayon sprang up in cities such as New York, London, New Delhi and Hong Kong. Former palaces were hired for product launches, with Bollywood stars and Indian billionaires arriving by private jet.
Modi's public persona – he was rarely photographed without being flanked by celebrities – was very different to his private one. "He never could look you in the eye," says a former business associate, who asks not to be named. "He always played his cards close to his chest."
By 2013, Modi had entered the Forbes list of billionaires with a net worth of $US1.4 billion and two years later, became the first Indian retailer to open on New York's Madison Avenue. His signature pieces now graced the necklines and earlobes of celebrities such as Naomi Watts, Kate Winslet, Taraji P. Henson and supermodel Karlie Kloss as they strode down the red carpet at the Oscars. British actor and model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley was hired to be the "face" of the brand. Indian actress Priyanka Chopra (now Chopra-Jonas) appeared in a commercial that ended with the punchline "Say Yes, Forever". Chopra-Jonas is now suing Modi for non-payment of fees.
The fallout from the Modi affair goes far deeper than his failure to settle his debts. Shortly after India's independence in 1947, the Jains of Palanpur – followers of a religion which emerged on the subcontinent around the sixth century BC and which preaches non-violence, strict vegetarianism and renunciation of worldly effects – abandoned their traditional occupations as bankers and money-lenders and began trading in diamonds. Like Modi's father, many moved to Antwerp, buying low-quality roughs, sending them back to India for polishing and then selling them at a small profit. Today a community of no more than 20,000 controls India's multibillion-dollar diamond cutting and polishing industry.


“Modi never could look you in the eye. He always played his cards close to his chest.”

"Their reputation has definitely taken a beating because of Modi," says Usha Balakrishnan, a Mumbai-based authority on India's jewellery trade. "Normally the community will close ranks behind one of their own. This time, they have disowned him." Balakrishnan traces the community's rise to the 1960s, when De Beers began looking for a centre to cut and polish its vast stockpile of industrial and small diamonds. India's plentiful supply of low-cost skilled labour made it the most attractive option and the Palanpuris were well positioned to supply the mining giant's demands.
Community members started returning to India, where they dominated the wholesale diamond trade in Zaveri Bazaar and the cutting and polishing centres in cities such as Surat in Gujarat. When Zaveri Bazaar's congested office spaces became too small, most traders moved to the Bharat Diamond Bourse, a sprawling eight-hectare complex in central Mumbai that opened in 2001 and is now home to more than 2500 companies.
Known for their work ethic and close family ties, Palanpuri Jains rarely marry outside their community. If one of their own falls on hard times, extended families act as a safety net, providing jobs, accommodation and financial help. Networks of loyalty and trust that go back generations have been shaken by Modi's alleged wrongdoings.
Ashish Mehta, a Palanpuri Jain whose company, Kantilal Chhotalal, is one of the diamond industry's leading players, says the allegations surrounding Modi have shocked the community. "The last few years when he was opening stores in places like London, New York and Hong Kong, most people were wondering how he was able to grow so fast. Nobody knew that there was this borrowed money behind the market aggression that he was showing. That was to most of us a big surprise."
Modi kept a low profile in the community, once boasting: "Ask any jeweller in Mumbai if he has met me in the last decade and the answer you'll get is no." When it came to networking with the city's business and cultural elite, however, he was everywhere, buying up contemporary Indian art at auctions, attending high-society weddings, and enticing Bollywood stars to buy his creations. He was anathema in a traditionally conservative community that shied away from retail and prided themselves on keeping out of the spotlight.
After the Punjab National Bank scandal broke, the demand for diamond jewellery in India plummeted by 10 to 15 per cent, according to the Indian industry lobby group Assocham. There are also fears that India might lose its near monopoly on diamond cutting and polishing, with new entrants such as China poised to take advantage of the turmoil. Small and medium-sized traders are feeling the greatest impact, says Mehta. "Banks are worried, so they have curtailed their lending facilities and are now asking for more collateral than before."
While hikes in short-term interest rates and a tightening of repayment terms are quantifiable, the erosion of trust is harder to measure.
At Mumbai's Diamond Bourse, transactions worth millions of dollars are sealed with a handshake and contracts and invoices are almost unheard of. Even the transportation of rough diamonds from the bourse to the cutting and polishing centres is entrusted to a centuries-old system run by the Angadias, a community of couriers who secrete their precious cargo in hidden pockets and rely on their anonymity to keep it safe.
Naming and shaming is not something that comes naturally to Palanpuri Jains, but Mehta concedes that Modi's actions have harmed the trade. "When the consumers see that there is a guy like this in your community, your credibility for sure gets affected."
Back in Zaveri Bazaar, the streets have been swept by the niarewalas to a level of cleanliness uncharacteristic by Mumbai standards and the stores are starting to open. My guide is the pugnacious Rajesh Chugani, a small-time jewellery manufacturer who buys his stones from local wholesalers and sends them to his workshop in nearby Masjid Bandar.
Chugani takes me deep inside the labyrinthine laneways of the bazaar, up crumbling staircases and down dimly lit corridors so narrow two people can hardly pass. An open doorway reveals a huddle of buyers engaged in heated negotiations with a wholesaler over a fistful of gold necklaces. Further on, a diamond is being cut in a hot and humid room no bigger than a broom closet.
Business is brisk and demand for traditional commodities such as gold is as strong as ever. But the traders Chugani deals with say the Modi affair has made it harder for them to get bank credit and consumers are suspicious about the quality of stones on sale.
"In this industry it's impossible to grow overnight; that should have sent alarm bells ringing … somewhere down the line, I think the government is also covering up," Chugani says, referring to the commonly held belief of a nexus of corruption between politicians and high-profile business people.
Small units such as Chugani's have always accounted for the bulk of India's jewellery manufacturing. The set-up inside the four-metre by three-metre room where eight men work 10-hour days might look Dickensian, but it is sophisticated and includes the use of 3D-printers to make moulds, and a network of CCTV cameras that monitor every corner of the workshop and can be remotely controlled by an app on his smartphone.
It's unlikely that Chugani's clients, many of whom are based in the Middle East, would know or care about the conditions under which their engagement rings or diamond bracelets are made. Maintaining close relations with his suppliers and customers and providing quality products is what makes thousands of businesses like his prosper.
"Whatever you'll see in a catalogue, we can copy and sell it more cheaply," says Chugani as he inspects a diamond brooch that one of his workmen is repairing. "I can make you a Nirav Modi piece as well," he adds cheekily. "And I don't think he's in a position to complain if I do."
Chugani is safe for now. Even if Britain accedes to India's extradition request, it may take years for the country's notoriously slow legal system to decide on Modi's guilt or innocence. The damage to the trust that has kept the diamond industry so prosperous may take even longer to repair.
To read more from Good Weekend magazine, visit our page at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and Brisbane Times

After graduating from George Washington University, Paul Linebarger went to Oxford in England where he was groomed for his intelligence career.  84    
In the future, Paul Linebarger would be one of several CIA agents who helped Hubbard start Dianetics and Scientology. In addition to that, Linebarger and Hubbard worked for a CIA unit called Political Action Staff.
The head of that CIA unit was under Kermit Roosevelt junior whose father was a ROOM member.   86   

 
Intelligence Assignment in Puerto Rico
In 1932 Vincent Astor starts forwarding ROOM intelligence directly to Franklin Roosevelt.
Most early data concerned general conditions in the Caribbean and Panama Canal Zone.   30

November 1928 – Hubbard is leaving China, going back to Guam.
January 1, 1929 – Ian MacBean writes to Hubbard, calls him a lieutenant and says he has been retained. 16
Dear Red,
You’ll probably hear this officially soon but I want to let you know first. You’re still a Lieutenant. You’ve been retained in spite of all the fuss the Ambassador made.
Please come back…
Mac
A copy of Ian MacBean’s 1929 letter to L. Ron Hubbard was an exhibit in the Gerald Armstrong 1 trial.
We see from this that Ron Hubbard was hired by British intelligence and given the rank of Lieutenant.
It was to be his lifelong career…

A campaign rally in 2008 in Florida. Once in the White House, Mr. Biden was to play the sage mentor, helping an unseasoned president navigate the treacherous politics of the capital. CreditDamon Winter/The New York Times

Roosevelt as Assistant Secretary of the US Navy.Astor and Roosevelt had in common that their grandfathers became wealthy trafficking opium into China.
The grandfather of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Warren Delano Jr., was chief of operations for Russell & Co., a Boston trading firm which did big business in the China opium trade in Canton. He first went to China at age 24 and spent a decade dealing opium on the Pearl River before returning to New York wealthy. He admitted in letters home that opium had an “unhappy effect” on its users, but argued that its sale was “fair, honorable, and legitimate,” akin to importing wine and spirits to America. Astor’s grandfather became wealthy from trading furs and trafficking opium.

Human 2.0 Is Almost Here: The Transhumanism Agenda Just Went Mainstream
“Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.” …Charles Mackay
Truthstream Media
Please help support us on Patreon, read our goals here: https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia Truthstream Can Be Found Here: Our Film: TheMindsofMen.net Site: http://TruthstreamMedia.com Twitter: @TruthstreamNews Backup Vimeo: Vimeo.com/truthstreammedia DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX

Development of Dianetics and Scientology
Stephen Pearl Andrews was a leader in the religious movement called Spiritualism.


Stephen Pearl Andrews (March 22, 1812 – May 21, 1886) was an American individualist anarchist, linguist, political philosopher, outspoken abolitionist and author of several books on the labor movement and individualist anarchism.
Andrews was born in Templeton, Massachusetts on March 22, 1812, the youngest of eight children of the Reverend Elisha Andrews and his wife Ann Lathrop. He grew up thirty-five miles northeast in Hinsdale, New Hampshire.[1] Andrews went to Louisiana at age 19 and studied and practiced law there. Appalled by slavery, he became an abolitionist. He was the first counsel of Mrs. Myra Clark Gaines in her celebrated suits. Having moved to Texas in 1839, Andrews and his family were almost killed because of his abolitionist lectures and had to flee in 1843. Andrews travelled to England, where he was unsuccessful at raising funds for the abolitionist movement back in the United States.

While in England, Andrews became interested in Isaac Pitman's new shorthand writing system and upon his return to the United States he taught and wrote about the shorthand writing system and devised a popular system of phonographic reporting. To further this, he published a series of instruction books and edited two journals, The Anglo-Saxon and The Propagandist. Andrews devised a "scientific" language he called Alwato in which he was wont to converse and correspond with pupils. At the time of his death, Andrews was compiling a dictionary of Alwato which was published posthumously. A remarkable linguist, he also became interested in phonetics and the study of foreign languages, eventually teaching himself "no fewer than 32" languages.
By the end of the 1840s, he began to focus his energies on utopian communities. Fellow individualist anarchist Josiah Warren was responsible for Andrew's conversion to radical individualism and in 1851 they established Modern Times in Brentwood, New York. He was elected an Associate Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1846.  In 1857, Andrews established Unity Home in New York City. By the 1860s, he was propounding an ideal society called pantarchy which is a society with a voluntary government strongly connected with a New Catholic Church and from this he moved on to a philosophy he called "universology" which stressed the unity of all knowledge and activities. He was also among the first Americans to discover Karl Marx and the first to publish his Communist Manifesto in the United States.
Andrews was one of the first to use the word scientology. The word is defined as a neologism in his 1871 book The Primary Synopsis of Universology and Alwato: The New Scientific Universal Language.[4] In the 1870s, Andrews promoted Joseph Rodes Buchanan's Psychometry besides his own universology predicting that a priori derived knowledge would supersede empirical science as exact science.[5][6] Andrews was also considered a leader in the religious movement of spiritualism. Anarcho-syndicalist Rudolf Rocker called Andrews a significant exponent of libertarian socialism in the United States.

L. Ron Hubbard was not “mankind’s greatest friend”.
As an intelligence agent for the British slavemasters – he was one of mankind’s greatest enemies.


Formation of MI 6

In 1909, the British Home Office became MI 5 and the British Foreign Office became MI 6.
MI5 is Britain’s counter-espionage service. It operates inside Great Britain.
MI6 conducts intelligence activities on foreign soil, outside of Britain.


Admiral Sir George Mansfield Smith-Cumming headed the new Foreign Section of the British Secret Service.
The new Foreign Section is called the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) and MI 6.

Mansfield_Cumming_Admiral Sir George Mansfield Smith-Cumming headed the new Foreign Section of the British Secret Service.

Commander Thompson Mentor To Ron Hubbard
.
Commander Joseph Thompson was a medical officer (neurosurgeon) in the US Navy.

Joseph Cheesman Thompson
Joseph Thompson of the US Navy and Consuelo Andrew Seoane of the US Army, served together as spies in Japan starting in 1909. They pretended they were studying coastal reptiles and amphibians, but they were actually charting possible invasion routes and counting all the Japanese fortifications and naval guns that were part of Japan’s coastal defenses. Their espionage work went on from there into places other than Japan. In a subsequent assignment, Thompson was sent into China because of the Boxer rebellion there.
Commander Thompson had a career doing intelligence work using the same archaeologist, exploring scientist cover. He studied bugs and dug up ancient graves, sometimes operating under his real name and sometimes using fake names such as Dr. Victor Kuhne and Joe Tom Sun.  24
Commander Thompson would become the mentor to Ron Hubbard.
On 13 March 1911 Lafayette Ronald Hubbard was born. He is the son of United States naval commander Harry Ross Hubbard and Ledora May Hubbard. A friend of Ron’s father was US Navy Commander Joseph “Snake” Thompson.

All of the basic mental, spiritual, and religious ideas found in Dianetics and Scientology were already developed by the Society for Psychical Research, before L. Ron Hubbard was even born. That includes the therapy used.


Vincent Astor Intelligence Network – Naval Reserves
Waldorf Astor was an early member of the Round Table. He and his wife Nancy lived in an estate called Cliveden.
Waldorf and Nancy Astor

The Astors held regular weekend parties and the group that attended them was known as ‘the Cliveden set’.
Some of them were –
Edward Wood, Lord Halifax  (member of Round Table)
Philip Kerr, Lord Lothian  (member of Round Table)
Lionel Curtis  (member of Round Table)
Robert Brand  (member of Round Table)
Geoffrey Dawson  (member of Round Table, editor London Times)
Samuel Hoare  (Foreign Secretary, MI 6)

Waldorf Astor had a wealthy relative in America – William Vincent Astor.
William Vincent Astor
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was Assistant Secretary of the US Navy from 1913 to 1920. Vincent Astor was good friends with Franklin Roosevelt, and they met during World War I to discuss using yachts to make a Naval Reserve Force. They selected their wealthy socialite friends to form a private intelligence network called the Naval Reserves. Their socialite pals were young men who shared the “right” schools, clubs, and connections, and all of them were pro-British. These reserve intelligence officers were under the Office of Naval Intelligence.  12, 15

Roosevelt as Assistant Secretary of the US Navy
Astor and Roosevelt had in common that their grandfathers became wealthy trafficking opium into China.

The grandfather of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Warren Delano Jr., was chief of operations for Russell & Co., a Boston trading firm which did big business in the China opium trade in Canton. He first went to China at age 24 and spent a decade dealing opium on the Pearl River before returning to New York wealthy. He admitted in letters home that opium had an “unhappy effect” on its users, but argued that its sale was “fair, honorable, and legitimate,” akin to importing wine and spirits to America.
Astor’s grandfather became wealthy from trading furs and trafficking opium.
Woodrow Wilson became President of the United States in 1913.
Edward House helped Wilson get elected and was Wilson’s closest adviser.
Colonel Edward Mandell House

World War I was from 1914 to 1919. That was an European conflict that had nothing to do with the United States. American citizens were against America getting into the war. But the British wanted to get America involved on the British side.
Sir George Mansfield Smith-Cumming sent Sir William Wiseman to run the British intelligence effort in America. Wiseman and Colonel House were good buddies. Wiseman was the handler of House, and House was invested in controlling American President Woodrow Wilson. Wiseman and House worked together on handling Wilson to get America into the war.

Woodrow Wilson became President of the United States in 1913.

Woodrow Wilson
Edward House helped Wilson get elected and was Wilson’s closest adviser.
Colonel Edward Mandell House

World War I was from 1914 to 1919. That was an European conflict that had nothing to do with the United States. American citizens were against America getting into the war. But the British wanted to get America involved on the British side.
Sir George Mansfield Smith-Cumming sent Sir William Wiseman to run the British intelligence effort in America. Wiseman and Colonel House were good buddies. Wiseman was the handler of House, and House was invested in controlling American President Woodrow Wilson. Wiseman and House worked together on handling Wilson to get America into the war.

Aleister Crowley was an MI 6 agent who had the cover of being in the occult. Robert Cecil was his patron who had sent him to Cambridge University for training as a “diplomat”. So, Robert Cecil himself was who recruited Aleister Crowley for British intelligence.
Aleister Crowley worked for William Wiseman during World War I and helped with getting America into the war.
In the 1920’s and 1930’s Crowley spied on Germans with occult interests. 17, 25 

Edward Alexander Crowley
Spencer Eddy, a wealthy New York socialite, was close friends with Franklin Roosevelt.
Spencer Fayette Eddy

In early 1916, William Wiseman recommends to Franklin Roosevelt to have Spencer Eddy start up a spy network to gather domestic intelligence. Eddy agreed to do it.

Commander Edward McCauley, Jr. was assistant director of Naval Intelligence and he acted as the handler for Eddy. Eddy recruited agents from the Naval Reserve Force. The agents in Eddy’s intelligence group were designated voluntary agents of Office of Naval Intelligence. 1

On 6 January 1917, Commander McCauley recruited all these voluntary agents into the United States Naval Reserve Force and gave them the rank of lieutenant junior grade. These men were made officers with temporary commissions and served as “volunteer agents” for the Office of Naval Intelligence. Vincent Astorwas made a Commander in the Naval Reserve.  13, 14

The Naval Reserve was basically a pro-British private intelligence network headed by Vincent Astor.

A little later in time Ron Hubbard was accepted into the Naval Reserves as an intelligence officer.

.

Behavior Modification by Psychiatry

.
During World War I, John Rawlings Rees and some other psychs were brought into the British Army to handle officer selection and to treat soldiers suffering from shell shock. They called it battle neurosis when the soldiers did not want to kill and be killed.

Their interest was in how to make men into killers and how to choose men to lead and influence others to kill.

They used abreactive therapy on the soldiers, followed up by drugs and electroshock “therapy”.

 

 

In 1920, these same psychs formed the Tavistock Institute of Medical Psychology, also called the Tavistock Clinic. They used the same treatments on the civilian population then.

John Rawlings Rees made the following statements about Tavistock Clinic –

…the best results with the war neuroses are obtained when they have active treatment.

“Psychosurgery” in the shape of abreaction followed by simple re-education should as a rule precede a period of rest under narcosis.

There is, however, no question that the general method of abreaction followed by sedation is applicable to many cases in civilian life…  64

 

JOHN RAWLINGS REES – TAVISTOCK
John Rawlings Rees was one of the psychiatrists who worked for British intelligence.

Hubbard Imitated Commander Thompson

1923 – Commander Joseph “Snake” Thompson had recently been to Vienna and was a personal student of Sigmund Freud on the subject of the mind and psychoanalysis.
Joseph Thompson
In the autumn of 1923, Snake was on his way back to Washington DC aboard the USS Ulysses S. Grant. Ron Hubbard and his parents boarded the same ship on 1 November 1923, also on their way to Washington, DC.
During this voyage, Ron meets Commander Joseph Thompson. 5

United States Ship Ulysses S. Grant
Commander Thompson was stationed at Saint Elizabeths Hospital in Washington, DC – a mental health hospital.

Commander Thompson was very close friends with Clara Thompson. She worked at Chestnut Lodge Sanitarium which is only a few miles away from Saint Elizabeths Hospital. She was trained at Tavistock Clinic, the place where John Rawlings Rees was working.

Clara Thompson
Starting in 1923, Commander Thompson became the mentor of L. Ron Hubbard who is 12 years old at the time. Thompson spent many afternoons in the Library of Congress teaching Ron Hubbard about the human mind. 5

Further Introduction to Dianetics, an LRH lecture 23 September 1950
I was in the Orient when I was young. Of course, I was a harum-scarum kid; I wasn’t thinking about deep philosophic problems; but I had a lot of friends. One such friend was Commander “Snake” Thompson.
He had studied under Sigmund Freud, and he found me a very wide-eyed and wide-eared boy. He had just come from Vienna, and his mouth and mind were full of associative words, libido theories, conversion, and all the rest of it. He had served as an intelligence officer in Japan during the First World War.

The Story of Dianetics and Scientology, an LRH lecture 18 October 1958 –

Anyway, at the Library of Congress in Washington, DC, where they have all the books on everything, he [Thompson] started shoving my nose into an education in the field of the mind. Now, that’s a very unusual thing to do, to take a twelve-year-old boy and start doing something with the mind. But he really got me interested in the subject – up to the point where I was pretty sure that Freud didn’t know what he was talking about.

Practicalities of a Practical Religion, an LRH lecture 3 June 1955 –
Now, another fellow who had been more or less my mentor when I was a little kid – as a matter of fact, I followed in the footsteps of this man – Commander Thompson…
I followed in the footsteps of this man –
Commander Thompson
Commander Thompson was an intelligence agent – not just in Japan during World War I, being an intelligence agent was his career. And that is exactly the career of Ron Hubbard, British intelligence agent, including him being the front man for Scientology. Scientology was always under the thumb of British intelligence.

Commander Joseph Thompson got Ron Hubbard started on his intelligence career.
Ron Hubbard followed Commander Thompson’s footsteps as an intelligence agent.
Mechanics of the Mind, an LRH lecture 10 January 1953 –
…I have approximated to a very remarkable degree the career of Commander Thompson…
…in the field of expeditions, explorations, I always favored certain quarters of the world, always went there and, when there, did certain things. It fits Commander Thompson’s record.
This man had a tremendous influence upon me.
Hubbard is revealing that his expeditions and explorations were cover for doing intelligence work.
Just like Commander Thompson did in his various explorations such as collecting bugs, digging up ancient graves, etc. Those activities were only a cover story to hide what he was really doing in each area – intelligence work.

The common denominator that explains all of Hubbard’s actions in life ….
L. Ron Hubbard
Vincent Astor Intelligence Network – The ROOM
Vincent Astor and his socialite friends required a retreat where they could gather in private to discuss political, financial and international topics. In 1927 Astor formed a secret society called The ROOM, which met monthly in an apartment at 34 East 62nd Street in New York City. All members had British ties and served as British agents. 4

The ROOM building
The ROOM was an outcropping of the previously formed Naval Reserves. The ROOM was the forerunner of the Office of Strategic Services – which was the forerunner of the Central Intelligence Agency.
The members conducted espionage in their travels around the world and they reported at the monthly meeting. Vincent Astor then forwarded the intelligence on to Franklin Roosevelt. It was a Roosevelt-Astor Espionage Ring.
Vincent Astor and Franklin Roosevelt
The most significant ROOM members were –
William Vincent Astor  (family connection in Round Table)
William Wiseman  (head of MI 6 in America)
William Donovan  (Chief of OSS)
David Kirkpatrick Este Bruce  (Chief of OSS in London)
Robert Gordon McKay  (member of OSS)
Charles Suydam Cutting  (member of OSS)
Frederick Trubee Davison  (member of CIA)
Somerset Maugham  (MI 6 agent)
Clarence L. Hay  (Naval Reserve intelligence agent)
William Rhinelander Stewart  (U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence)
Other important Room members were –
Winthrop Williams Aldrich  (son of Nelson Aldrich – who helped enact federal reserve system)
Nelson Doubleday  (publisher, friend of MI 6 agent Ian Fleming)
Barklie McKee Henry (schooled at Oxford University)
Kenneth B. Schley (close friends with Duke and Duchess of Windsor)
H. Nugent  (Kermit Roosevelt’s close English friend)
Reginald Fincke  (his daughter married a British nobleman)
Oliver Dwight Filley  (pilot with the Royal Flying Corps in World War I)
Kermit Roosevelt Sr. (son of American President Theodore Roosevelt, joined the British Army)
Theodore Roosevelt Jr. (son of American President Theodore Roosevelt)    27, 28

Leah Remini and her missing friend Shelly Miscavige, the wife of David Miscavige the head of Scientology 

The sluice constructed by Carper and Hubbard

On 20 November 1932, Hubbard writes a letter in Corozal, Puerto Rico –
“Carper and Wilkerson went out yesterday to see some property and left me running the sluice.”
In another Church collection, Hubbard says:
“…as Carper had left me in charge of the sluice for some days, I closed down shop and paid off the native workers with my last money. After that I sat on my heels and wondered what Carper had found which detained him so long out in the island.
But I did not have to worry for long about Carper and sluicing, as he suddenly took himself and the remainder of the eight hundred dollars out of the picture without even telling me goodbye.
After that I had ample time to study the history of gold mining in Puerto Rico, for I was too broke to do any prospecting other than with a pan…”
So, this mining expedition was a joke. They had one little sluice which they closed down within a month.
Pedro Campos was having a lot of pull with the people, especially the inland farmers who were called the jibaros.
The Church of Scientology claims that Hubbard “made the first complete mineralogical survey of Puerto Rico” during which he “sluiced inland rivers and crisscrossed the island in search of elusive gold” as well as carrying out “much ethnological work amongst the interior villages and native hillsmen or jíbaros“.
After closing the sluice, Hubbard had 4 months free to run around the island doing what he is really there to do, a psychological survey of the rebelling jíbaros. That was the intelligence mission, Hubbard’s employer wanted to find out how they could manipulate the jíbaros.
In another letter Hubbard says –
“…my friends in the North sent support to me in the form of Thomas Finley McBride…”
Thomas McBride was a mining engineer who worked for American Smelting and Refining Company. One of its owners is William Rockefeller and Grant Schley was on the board of directors, he is the father of ROOM member Kenneth B. Schley. Now we see who Hubbard’s employer was, who wanted to get control of the political situation in Puerto Rico.
West Indies Minerals sends a letter to Hubbard on 30 March 1933 –

Dear Mr. Hubbard,

Due to the recent developments in the investigations of the deposits and properties under consideration on the island it is imperative that you return to Washington for a conference.
You will leave Puerto Rico on the first available transportation for New York and thence to Washington, D.C
The “conference” would have been where Hubbard was debriefed on what he had learned about the jíbaros.
Ship records show Hubbard departing San Juan on 6 April 1933 on the SS Coamo bound for New York.  36
West Indies Minerals was also a joke. It was used to provide cover for Hubbard’s intelligence work in Puerto Rico.
Its small office had two guys with no experience in mining. It was closed down shortly for failure to pay taxes. 38
Pedro Campos was subsequently arrested on false charges and sentenced to prison in Atlanta, Georgia.
During his imprisonment Campos was subjected to human radiation experiments.

Campos with burns caused by intense radiation

It was later revealed that Sargant worked for MI 5 and MI 6.

Hubbard Recruited by British Intelligence
In April 1928 Hubbard drops out of high school and goes to meet his parents in Guam.
On 30 May 1928 Hubbard traveled to China aboard the Mariana Maru, without his parents along.
Ron Hubbard aboard the Mariana Maru – he is 17 years old
Hubbard apparently spent more than six months in China, because a journal entry in his diary on November 11, 1928 shows that he has left Peking, and is now at sea again.
This is the time when Hubbard’s British intelligence career gets officially going.
Major Ian MacBean worked for MI 6 in China. His wife was Phyllis Bedell and since childhood she was lifelong friends with Admiral Mark Kerr. His cousin was Philip Henry Kerr, a member of the Round Table who held top positions in British intelligence and he worked directly with Lord Robert Cecil. The point is – Major Ian MacBean had family connection right to the top of the British slavemasters.  57
Starting in June 1928, Hubbard gets trained by British intelligence man Ian MacBean, for the next six months.
An autobiographical excerpt by Hubbard:
I was up and down the China coast several times in my ‘teens from Ching Wong Tow to Hong Kong and inland to Peking and Manchuria. I had a very good friend in the British Legation in Peking, Major Ian MacBean who was an intelligence officer. My friends were very kind to me, even indulgent, and I was extremely fortunate in having the friendship of a great many older men. They found me a good listener.
Ian MacBean took Hubbard on a tour of British intelligence efforts from Peking through northern China.
From the L. Ron Hubbard website –
…among those encountered through the course of his second Asian venture… was a Major Ian MacBean of the British Secret Service. Precisely why this MacBean would take a seventeen-year-old L. Ron Hubbard through a tour of British intelligence efforts from Peking through northern China is not known. Nonetheless, and as we shall see, MacBean’s lessons were to serve Ron well.
http://adventurer.lronhubbard.org/page06.htm

Hubbard, in his own words in Dime Adventure magazine, October 1935 –
I completely missed the atmosphere of the city, devoting most of my time to a British major who happened to be head of the Intelligence out there.
Originally published in the February 1935 issue of Five Novels –
It was on Hubbards second journey to East Asia that he met British Secret Service agent, Major Ian MacBean, who introduced him to “The Great Game,” the geopolitical tug-of-war between China, Japan, and Britain.   32

Scientology Aleister Crowley Tarot Card The rose-and-cross Tarot card developed by Satanist Aleister Crowley. Note the likeness with the Scientology cross.

Scientology E-Meter Are we having fun yet? Tell all your most intimate secrets to the E-Meter; it’s strictly confidential! Author William S. Burroughs, pedophile, occultist and suspected CIA asset had plenty of blackmail material handy.

What is Scientology - A Religion or Business?
Marc Headley
Former Scientologist and Sea Org Member
Valuetainment presents..Aan interview with Patrick Bet-David the Founder of Valuetainment

 

Question:
When you think about Scientology .. what does it mean to you?
Answer: I's rather be deads than be in Scientology..
Question: Seriously .. you say that ...
Answer: I comtemplated just ... driving into a wall and just killing myself.. 
Question: You're being serious...
Answer:  Absolutely..
Questio: Suicide...
Answer: Death would be a better existence ... that living there in Scientology...
Question:
When you say beating people .. what do you mean by that?
Answer:  
They are being punched, and kicked while they are sotting at the table ... 
Quesion:
It is hard to belive that... how can an organisation do that period.?
Answer: Under the guise of religion ... you have thousands and thousands of these little aliens attached  to you ... 
Question: I have aliens attached to me?
Answer: everybody does... especially you ...
Question: 
Either its brilliant or the people that represent the CHurch of Scientology  and the Government that approved the Church of Scientyology are idiots ... 
INTRODUCTION:
"... So before you watch this interview I want to preface a few things because:
a part of this interiew is going to controversial and there are a lot of areas where I push the guest and some areas where he's going to say something that Scientologists are not going to agree with or like .. ther're probably  going to hare some of it .. some of what the guest say s... so while we did this interview we  decide to reach out to David McSchavich .. we sent and email ... our executive producer Sir Gerard Haran sent an email to him ... and sayin i am the exective producer to David Bed-David of Valuetainment Media we interviewed Marc Heady and in an effor to provide a right of objection and fair and balanced coverage we will like to offer David Mschavich equal time to tell his side of the story ... thank you Gerrard Haran... 
So that was our email to him..,. to be able to sit down with him .. as there was a lot fo questions I had to ask .. I have worked with a lot of Scientologists myself .. I've many good experiences .. I am not a Scientologist myself, but there was a time in my like when I was extremely curious ... I was an athestic at the time.... I went and studied everything ... I would go to every church and debate everybody .... with all these tough questions .... because I was trying to get clarity for myself... 


This was the response we received from the Church of Scientology..

Dear Mr Haran,


Controversy" about the Church is in evitably traceable to the same handfull of bitter former members licked out for their malfeandance and eithical lapsed many years ago.  Those who would seek to introduce controversy where noen exists have an agenda. In their case, it is always financial. They get paid to feen tales to tabloids that are salacious and untrue. They know nothing about what is on out new television channel -- our spiritual headquarters in Clearwater, Bridge Publications, our International Dissemination and Distribution Center, and our new Churches that span 23 nations and six continents. Thy eknow noting about Scientology Media productions, our hmanitiarian, drug rehabiliation and social betterment programs, and success. They have no creditability. Those who live in tim houses shouldn't throw can openers. We suggest you look into them. See, for example wwww.whoismarcheadley.com.
Regards
Media Relations


And the have a link below to find out more about the gentleman I am interviewing ...  and to be and give full disclosure ... sp not one's getting paid for this ...we are not paying Marc to do this interview .. we don;t pay our guests to be interviewed on Valuetainment ... that is full diisclosure ... Marc and I don't know each other ....  we don't have a friendship .. we don;t have a relationship .... the first time I ever met Marc when he was a guest on this show ... with that being said ... as you watch this .. you will notice a couple of parts where Marc gets pushed very ... very ... hard .... in certain areas and if there is an area that I am going give a perspective that nobody has thought about whne ti comes down to the Church of Scientology so i ask you to watch this with an open mind from the beginning to the end .... and I really want the hear from you as to what you took away from this interview with Marc Headly on the stories regarding Scientology ... truth or not .. I want to hear from you ... with that been said ... here's the interview with Marc Headly 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eTmlwFlyQQ 


 talks about the book
Blown for Good
Behind the Iron Curtain of Scientology
by  Marc Headly
 also was in Scientology and the Aftermath with Leah Remini
331,459 views  

So I got a call from friends of mine and entrepenures 


What do you think about Scientology?
So I said listen..
I think that the best way to answer the question about what I think about Scientology ... I have my own opinionss about Scientology ....  I have a lot of friends who are Scientologists ... and I've worked with a lot of people who are Scientologists .... so i said .... let me reach out and find out who we can interview that can tell you all about Scientology and we can go through questions... 
So we contacted  David Miscavige   .. who pretty well runs Scientology 


David Miscavige is the leader of the Church of Scientology. His official title is Chairman of the ... The group started with running Hubbard's errands, but as they grew into ... well managed by Author Services Inc., of which Miscavige was Chairman of the ....  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Miscavige 
 David Miscavige (/mɪˈskævɪdʒ/) is the leader of the Church of Scientology.[1] His official title is Chairman of the Board of the Religious Technology Center (RTC), a corporation that controls the trademarks and copyrights of Dianetics and Scientology.


Miscavige was a deputy to church founder L. Ron Hubbard (a "Commodore's messenger") while he was a teenager. He rose to a leadership position by the early 1980s and was named Chairman of the Board of RTC in 1987. Official church biographies describe Miscavige as "the ecclesiastical leader of the Scientology religion"

Since he assumed his leadership position, there have been a number of allegations made against Miscavige. These include claims of forced separation of family members, coercive fundraising practices, harassment of journalists and church critics, and humiliation of church staff members, including physical assaults upon them by Miscavige. Miscavige and church spokespersons deny the majority of these claims, often criticizing the credibility of those who bring them.


We realised that the last time David Miscavige did an interview was 24 years ago with Ted Carple ...and then after that ... out team did a little research and we came towith the name Marc Headley and we contacted Marc ... now this may not be the favourite person that Scientologists would want me to interveiw ...but ... because it would be a lot different if could have got David...then is we could not get David we wanted to get somebody ...we got Marc here... for some of you to know who Marc is ....Marc work for the Church of Scientology for 15 years from 1990 up until 2005 .... four years after L Ron Hubbard died... Marc was there for 15 years at the International Base of Scientology in California ... 
Marc Headley: The International Base of Scientology in California ...  is the facility that runs and control Scientology internationally..
Question: You guys have around 5,000 people that work for Scientology world wide and around 700 people who work at the International Base of Scientology in California ... 
Answer:  yes at that facility there is bewteen 500 and 700 people working there ... at that one facility in Cakifornia ..
Marc also wrote a book called:
"Blown for Good "
Behind the Iron Curtain of Scientology..
Marc's book ... Blown for Good ...  means blown for good the image and secrets of the Church of Scientology .. when Marc stepped away form the Church..... there were some ugly things that happened to Marc when he left Scientology for good ... 
Marc is going to shrae some of that experience ..
Mrc also was in an Emy Award Winning Series called
"Scientology and the Aftermath" ...  with Leah Remini
 Question:
When you think about Scientology .. what does it mean to you? 
back then ... not now..
Answer:  Then I just  considered   Scientology  as a belief system 
Answer: Then I just knew it as a belief system .... L Ron Hubard has written thousands and thousands of Policy Letters ...  and Bulletens ... about how an individual is treated if they resign from Sea Org...
the policy leters have to do with how they have to work in the Sea Orgnanisation and how they apply to the Sea Org buisnesses ... then the Bulletins .... have to do with the teachings of Scientology ... the auditing ... the councilling they do in Scientology .. the courses .... and that sort of thing .... so i went to a Scientology School when I was little ... I did Scientology Courses  at the Scientology Centre at night .... and that's sort of all I knew as a kid .... that's how we did things... you just .... they have certain ways about gong about living and ... that's all I knew as a kid, so when I was recruited to work for the Sea Organisation 
 expected when you are a kid in Scientology ... is that the best thing you can expect you can do is join the Sea Organisation... because that is the most dedicated group of Scientologists...
They dedicate a billion years ... you actually sign a contract .. a Billion_Year-Contract  of Employment with the Sea Organization...
Its almost expected when you are a kid in Sceintology  ... that the best
"It is expected when you are a kid in Scientology ... is that the best thing you can expect you can do is join the Sea Organisation... because that is the most dedicated group of Scientologists...
They dedicate a billion years ... you actually sign a contract .. a Billion_Year-Contract  of Employment with the Sea Organization...
Question:
You mean you are contracted to be with them for one billion years..
Answer: Yes  .. even when you die .. you are contracted to come back in the next life time to work for the Sea Org ..
In the Sea Organisation ... sometimes when people die ... you actually have an In Mormorium Notice that goes out ... and it says at the end that .... 
" this person in granted a 21 year Leave of Absense .. "
and they expect to see them back...
Question:
Did you yourself ... your mother was a member of the Church of Scientology in 1979, when Marc was 6 or 7 years old ... .... then afterwards .. all you know is Scientology ... then you started working with Scientology form the age of 16 to 31 ... what is Scientology you?
Answer: Then I just knew it as a belief system .... L Ron Hubard has written thousands and thousands of Policy Letters ...  and Bulletens ... about how an individual is treated if they resign from Sea Org...
the policy leters have to do with how they have to work in the Sea Orgnanisation and how they apply to the Sea Org buisnesses ... then the Bulletins .... have to do with the teachings of Scientology ... the auditing ... the councilling they doin Scientology .. the courses .... and that sort of thing .... so i went to a Scientology School when I was little ... I did Scientology Courses  at the Scientology Centre at night .... and that's sort of all I knew as a kid .... that's how we did thing ... you just .... they have certain ways about gong about living and ... that's all I knew as a kid, so when I was recruited to work for the Sea Organisation 
He originally thought Scientology as a beleif System
He was recruited to work for the Sea Organisation
Many Are Called. Few Are Chosen
Join Sea Org
"It is almost 
 expected when you are a kid in Scientology ... is that the best thing you can expect you can do is join the Sea Organisation... because that is the most dedicated group of Scientologists...
They dedicate a billion years ... you actually sign a contract .. a Billion_Year-Contract  of Employment with the Sea Organization...
Its almost expected when you are a kid in Sceintology  ... that the best
"It is expected when you are a kid in Scientology ... is that the best thing you can expect you can do is join the Sea Organisation... because that is the most dedicated group of Scientologists...
They dedicate a billion years ... you actually sign a contract .. a Billion_Year-Contract  of Employment with the Sea Organization...

Question:
You mean you are contracted to be with them for one billion years..
Answer: Yes  .. even when you die .. you are contracted to come back in the next life time to work for the Sea Org ..
I the Sea Organisation ... sometimes when people die ... you actually have an In Mormorium Notice that goes out ... and it says at the end that .... 
" this person in granted a 21 year Leave of Absense .. "
and they expect to see them back...
Question:
Did you yourself ... your mother was a member of the Church of Scientology for 11 years from  1979, when Marc was 6 or 7 years old ... .... then afterwards .. all you know is Scientology ... then you started working with Scientology from the age of 16 to 31 ... from 1979 onewards ..what is Scientology you? 
Did you look at Scientology as a religion of was it more as a secret society .. or like an organisation like the Freemasons or ... like a personal development .. Tony Robbins type of organisation .... estabilished group that had been around longer that Tony Robbins had been around ... and its kind of like the Nightingale Type of Group .. learning how to process  issues ... how to work better ,... how did you view Scientolgy when you were in it ... not today .. but when you were actally in Scientology ...


Answer:
Well they kind of drilled into us  the whole region angle ... 
They drilled us it was like we are a religion .. these are our religious beliefs? ... so when i was there .. I viewed Scientology as a religion .... but at the same time .. when you are at the International Headquaters of Scientology in California .. .there's crazy shit going on you all ovr the place .... so when you see that stuff... there's a lot of mental gymnatistics  is happening to justify we are doing this is the name of religion .... like this guy  David Miscavige   is beating people   

Question:
You actually witnessed  David Miscavige   actually beating people ....  when you say beating people .. what do you mean by that..
Answer:
Absolutely ... absolutely .... punching with you fists into the face ....  shoving ... kicking ... punching .... kicking ... throwing people across tables ... and throwing people against walls ..
Question:
Who were the people that this was happening to...
Answer:
Most of the people he would give beat downs to were  International Executives ...
so these were the people who were in  charge of runing Scientology  ....  were to most beat people at that property ..
Question:
These were influential names ....
these were influential figures within the Church of Scientology ... and they were also
 in the Sea Organisation .... so the people that are fighting ..... the people that are beating each other up .... are the top executives  of the Church of Scientology and the Sea Org.   .... 
Answer: Yeh... if any Scientologist knew that the people that we was beating.. they would know all their names ... Marc Ingerg, Marc Jager ...Gullaume Leserve 
Hiborjans  .. Mike Rinder ...  any of the people ...  these people he would give a beat down to were well know executives in the Church of Scientology ...  they were also in the Sea organization, so ... the people that are fighting and beating each othewr up are the top executives of Scientology ... so mit wouldn't be a public member like a person whoi goes into an Org in Cincinatti .. that person wouldn't see or be part this ... its all..
Question:  Behind the Scenes?
Answer: It all happened behind the curtain..
Question: Did it ever happen to you... did you 
Answer: On two occasisons David Miscavige struck me ... and one of the last occassions wa sin thr 2000's ... it was shortly before I left Scientology ...David Miscavige punched me .. be basically ... ... I had glasses at the time ... David Miscavige punched me so hard in the face that my glasses broke ....and um .. I went up against a cabinet  .. kinda like a desk unit  and um ... I didn't fall down or anything ... but when I regained myself David Miscavige saw i was coming for him ... and he's not a big guy .. he usually has an entourage with him though .... and as soon as he saw the look in my eyes ... these two guys grabbed and took me out of the building and as I was being led out of the building ... David Miscavige said ... " did you see that? ....jhat was the guy that was going tohit me.. and I said .. you bet .... I was the guy that was going to hit you ... "
Question: Not tgo play the devils advocate ... but how many other peoplehave come out saying what you're saying about David Miscavige actually hitting people .... 
Answer: at  least 20 to 30 other people..
Question: 20 other people have come out saying this has happened?
Answer: Absolutely ...
Question: if that is the case ... how come David Miscavige is still runniing the entire thing... ?
Answer: Because they've got a group of 50 people there that they write affidavits for the people ...
Question: Right?
Answer: They give them to them and they sign them..
So he's got 50 people against the 30 people ... that say that never happened and that David Miscavige never even yelled at anybody ...  and
say in the affidavits that David Miscavige  found a little birdie outside that wa damaged and David Miscavige nursed the little birdie back to life .... 
#avid Miscavige 
Question: Right?:
Answer:  These people writing these affidavits were experts and good at writing pure fiction ... and if they wanted to, tghey could have 200 of those affidavits ..
Question: Has there ever been a deep investigation into the Church ... or no...
Answer: Absolutley ..
Question: I mean deep ... deep ... investigations..
Answer: I have seen government drone footage of the actual International Headquaters .. I was shown this by the FBI ... 
Question: What was the court ruling afterwards?
Answer: it was dropped ..
Question: So you can see that ... I am not trying to defend the Scientologists .. I am not trying to defend the other side .. I am just trying to get an argument on both sides to say ... OK ... if that's really happened... who hasn't a court ... the court process .. someone would say .. the court probably didn't proceed because the court paid them off.... 

Answer: No... I can tell you exactly why they get out of it ... 
Question: Tell me why?
Answer: How ever spends the most money on their lawyers and who ever has the best legal team are the ones that win the case... and Scientology in the cases that have been brought against them..
Question: Yep..
Answer: Have ... like myself and my wife sued Scientology ,,, 
Legal Opinion by O'Scannlain, Curcuit |Judge
We considered two fromer minister's claims that the Church of Scientology forced them to provide labour in violation of the Trafficing Victims Protection Act...
And Scientology spent 10's of million of dollars fighting that case... 
Question: Your case..?
Answer: Just my case ... Scientology has an unlimited legal and private investigation team and dirty budget that they can call from .... they have an entire spy wing in Los Angelos .... in the 1970's there was a group called The Guardian's Office .. and that was the spy wing of Scientology  .. they purpetrated the largest infiltration into the United States Government in its history ....you can Google this ... Guardian's Office ...
Newspaper clippings
The F.B. I. Raid
Scientologists Charge Narcotics Vover-Up
Los Angelos Times ..
F.B.I Raids of Scientology Are Ruled Improper...
Judge clalls Warrants Too Broad to Justify Seizure of Paper From Scientology Files
Church Sues F.B.I Agents for $7 million Dollars 
Scientologists Claim Raids, Seizure of Documents Were in Retaliation for Suits Against Goovernment
Scientology Battles
F.B.I raids on Church offices were part of drug investigations

If you Google FIB Scientology Raids it iwll show up... I think 11 top Scientology Officials were jailed ... had jail time based on this whole thing... the F.B.I conducted a raid of several Scientology Facilities.. I think it was 1977 ...
Newspaper Article
FBI agent prepared to drive knob through a door with a sledge hammer during a raid on Cedars complex ...
Newspaper article and photo
Scientology officials (from left) Hugh Withere,  Jeff Friendman and Rom Haugen address press conference... 
In that raid they found documents that exonerated people that Scientology had sued... and they found all this evidence of how Scientology had basically framed these people .. all sorts of dirty tricks ...  Ok.... that organisation is called the Office of Special Affairs Today ... and its ins Hollywood .. its on 63/31 Hollywood Boulevard  ... and that organisation is the one the hires the lawyers ... they hire private investigators ..
Question: Is it part of the Church?
Answer: Absolutely ...the people that work in the office of Special Affars are Sea Organization members ..... One thing that you've got to know about SCientology is that ..L Ron Hubbard ... wrote anything its in stone ... it can never be changed .... and  ..L Ron Hubbard ... wrote a policy that says that when somebody leaves Scientology and then is they attack Scientology or they speak badly about Scientology .. the policy is to destroy them utterly ...
Question: Is that public information to the members?
Answer: No..Its an internal policy..
Question: Right.. who has read that .. the 5,000 members that work for Scientology world wide ... 
Answer: Most of them probably have...
Question: And they know about it?
This is a common thing?
If they ever leave you have to desstroy them?
Answer: Even to a point ... there is a book that is caled the Ethics Book
An Intruction to Scientology Ethics by L. Ron Hubbard
and that book that any Scientologist can read.... anybody can reads it even if your not a Scientologist ... and in there it has crimes and high crimes and misdomenours ... and in that it talks about if you associate with a supressive person .. if you help a supressive person ... if you give a supressive person a platform to speak out ... these are High Crimes .... so either way .. this group .. the Office of Special Affairs .. one of theirt sole purposes is to destroy crtics of Scientology .... that's all they do .. they actually have graphs on their wall in their desk unit of how many Scientologists they have cut connections from these supressive persons ... 
Question: You may say that this is common in other religions as well .. likeI was part of a group and I watched what happen in front of my when a couple of people steped away from the Church ... their families turned against those two people ... it was very ugly when that happened.. and |i thought ...wow that was pretty ugly .. and then ... they used to be lifte up .. all because something happened .... 
Answer: There is one thing in Scientology is called disconnection ... 
What is Disconnection?
A Scientologist can have trouble making speritual progress in his audiig or training if he is connected to someone who is supressive or who is antagpnostic to Scientology or its tenets. All spititual advance gained from |Scientology may well be losy becaue one os continually invalidated by an antogolistic person 
 by a supressive person who wants nothing more than to do harm to tha person.
There are words for it in other religions ... so I leave ... and you don't want to talk to me anymore ... ok that's fine.... but when you call child services to try and get my ids taken away .... or you have private investigators camped outside my house  or ...
Question: Did this happen to somebody else ... or did that happen to you?
Answer: That happened to me.... 
 Child Services got an anomynmous tip ...that our kids were in danger ...  and Child Services showe dup to our house ... when we were working with the FBI in the investigation ... we gave al the information over ... about this  Child Services thing ..,. to the FBI .... without officially saying it ...,,
. they said ... yep they did that .... OK you can say other religions .. I do not know how many other religions have... have million and millions of dollars to pay private investigators to follow former members ... 
Question:
Wel i will tell you this.... there is an individual that worked at Scientology's International Headquarters ...and he left in the 1980's .. and David Miscavige  .. this is documented ... this was reported on by the |Tamper Bay Times ...

Newspaper article and photo:
" IN my view the warrant ... invited agents to sieze any documents in the Church's files that struck their fancy ...  the sweep of that discretion is constututionally tollerable ... (Federal Justice William Bryant)

Tampa Bay Times
tampabay.com
The Truth Rundown
High-Ranking Defections say Scientology's leader Enforces Loyalty with beatings and Bullying... 
Two private invetstigators were paid by David Miscavige  adn they reported to David Miscavige  ... they watched this former Scientologist that worked in the Sea Orh International Base fp 25 years ... two private investigators ... that was their whole life ... they were paid milions and million ... just two guys were paid millions and millions of dollars to watch one single ex-Scientologist .... that's one..
Question: How important was that one...?
Answer:  He was the guy that David Miscavige  ... they have these levels in Scientology ... they have OT Levels ....
OT I
OT II
to
OT XV etc
to total freedom 
and you have hundreds of thousands of dollars to get to the top level ,,,
Question: How many levels ... I seen 15 levels .. I've seen 10 levels?
Answer: They have eight levels.. OK ... this guy that left ... David Miscavige  thought that this guy took levels 9 and 10 with him ...
because they don't have a 9 and 10 level ... 
L Romn Hubbard wrote a chart that goes from OT I to OT 15 ... but l Ron Hubbard only finishe dup to level 8 before he died... he himself only wrote up to either levels... they have been telling Scientologists that these levels 9 to 15 exist ... but they don't ...that's fiction .... but this guy that left ...David Miscavige  thinks that he took levels9 and ten with him ... because the guy that left worked with l Ron Hubbard .... 
Question:   So this was not a regular guy that left that they spent $25 million dollars on private investorgators to watch him ... this was a pretty influenntial guy that leeft Scientology .... so lets ..
Answer: Ether way ... you say its like other religions ....well I've worked there for 15 years and I've seen other things... don't get me wrong.... I've seen other horrible things that happens in other cults and in other religions .. but form working there for 15 years ... I can tell you that Scientology ... and Scientology has benn around since the 1950's   ... Scientology has spent 60 to 70 years perfecting this spy ops ... this black ops type of engagement against former members ... so ... there maybe other placed that do it .. but Scientology's Spy Operations are lowe level ... they know how to do stuff ..... 
Question: If you think about it ... ENRON .... ENRON is a very big compant ... multi million to multo billion dollar company ... they have some of the best lawyers ... the best lawyers than anybody else at that time ... they were still taken down ... you Google  various large comanies which are $50 billion dollar empires .... bigger than Scientology ,, bigger than a lot of other compant empires and it the proper investigation in done they still go down ... so how come it hasn't happened to Scientology?
I know that Scientology has 20 to 30 thousand members .... don't know the exact numbers ... you would know better than me ..
Answer: That's fairly accurate..
Question: 20 to 30 thousand members ... and the biggest name in probably To, Cruise and you have John TRavalta .. I know in the past Scienfield dabbled with it a little bit but says i was never part of it... I just took a few courses ... Brad Pitt used ot be there whern he used ot date a girl who used to be a bib scientologist .... he used to dabble with it a litle bit ... youi have some other names .. such as Katie Homes ... al these girls that were with Tom Cruise who used ot part of it ... one pf Tom Cruises ex wives that used to be part of Scientology that introduced Tom Cruise to Scientology ... she left Scientology ... Greta Van Sistrin in sa Scietologist and she works for Fex News ... I don't know about John Travolta .. I dress like John Travolta Style from Saturday Night Fever ... when I wa sin the Army .. he has great taste ... and he knows how to dance ... but I do not know if I would put John Travolta as a genious ... I dont' think I would put him in that category ... 
Answer: John Travolta is not their best spokes person..
Question: I can tell you that om Cruise comes across as a very smart guy to me ... when i saw Tom's interview with Mat Louer and he's going bacdk and forward ... he made a come back in his career ... there's pasrt of that interview that shows that this guy in making sense and he's pushing Mat back and forward ... and Greta is not a dummy .. Gretta is a smart person ... so then if it is watch you say it is .. and you're not the only person that is saying tihis ...then whu have so many intelligent smart people been turned onto this this ... why is that ... is it jusy because of the power and the fame .. or is is just because the content of Scientology changed their lives... 
Answer: I explain it like this .. let's say you hae a relationship problem ...you just can't get into relationships... and you ... some Scientologist say  hey we have a course
Book : How to Improve Relationships with others
Based on the works of L. Ron Hubbard
that can help you with relationships ...
Question: Sure...
Answer: I aleardy know that that is a
Book: Creating A Successful Marriage 
Based on the works of L. Ron Hubbard  

they call this a Ruin.... something that you have in your life that you can't  figure out and you can't solve it .. theu then say that we have as course that will help you with that exact thing... its $50 buck.... $100 bucks. you do that course you find out that there another 10 thongs that are messed up with your life that you didn't know were messed up ... yo just wanted to sort out getting a girl friend...they wil now sell you another $5,000 worth of courses to handle those ten problems that you figured out .... 
Fast forward ... 15 years later ... your third divorse .... you've spent $500.000 dollars (half a million dollars) and you've brnn chasing this relationship thing ... that then turned into all this other stuff....  and it doesn't matter what your Ruin is ... Scientology has a course that will handle that Ruin .... if you're a person who is not good at communicating ... they have a communications course ... if you can't get along with your family ... they have a course called '... How to Get Along With Others ... 
they've isolated ... and this is the genious of L Ron Hubbard ... he isolate all these different aeas of life that people have problems with and they made all these $50 courses ... that's the cheese .... once they get you in the trap .., it just goes like that for ever .... all the way up to OTA .. its always a bate and switch ... al these these things ... they say that you've got these Aliens attached to you ... 
Question: So they are creating an imaginary problem and having a solution for te imaginary problem ... which is called the Egallion Dilectic .. which is ..
Theis ( Propositio) v Anti thesis (Counter Proposition) 
to reconciliation
to Synthesus ( New Thesis) v Antithesis (Counter-Proposition)
tp reconciliation 
tp
Synthesis (New Thesis)
 I do not know if you are familiar with that..
Answer: I am and this is like the best part of it...
IT a set of cards .. this whole thing... but you build it...
Question: Right? it an old tactic
Answer: They get you in.... then you build the house  of cards yourself... and your navigating all these problems that essentially that you've put in your own road block in front og you and their saying .. Oh ...tthis how we can get you though thta road block... and that's eseentially what happens ... now ... I've talked to Scientologists that have gone all the way up to OTA ... and their like Yeh.... I've got nothin ... if I could rewind and got rid of all that .. I'd right were I am right now .... you learn a lot of things in Scientology about yourself ... but most of those things you are prompted for you to say ... so ... they are trying to get your money... that's the bottom linr. their trying to get your money .. and they are alos trying to get you to get other people is .. so they can thodr people's money .... there's anothrer thing ... there are not as lot of poor Scientologists ... if you know people who are Scientology ..... most of those people thaat you know have money ... because  ... they don't need porr people ... they don't need people that don't have money ... because what are they going to do .. they are just going to do thaat $50 dollsr course and  thren what .. that's it ... OK ...tnat's not as good value for them to get in those sort of people ....  and L. Ron Hubbard in the 1960's ot 1970's actually wrote this program .. I think it was called Project Celebrity ...
It we are to do anything about the society at large, we must do something about its communication lihnes.
One of the parts of this plan is Projecy Celebrity.
There are many of hom America and the world listens. On the backs of these are carried most of the enthusiasms on which society runs. it is vital, on or Third Dynamic operation, to put such persons into wonderful condition.
It is obvious what would happem to America if we helped its leaders to help others. Project Celelbrity is part of that program. It is obvious what would happen to Scientology if prime communications benefitting from it would metion it now and then.
Herein you finf a list of celebrities. If you want one of these, write us ay omce, giving the ONE celebrity you have celected. We will then allocate this person to tou as your game.
Having been awarded one of these celebrities, it will be up to you to learm what you can about your quarry and them put yourself at every hand across his or her path, and not permittingdiscourasgements or "no's" or clerks or secretaries to intervene, in days or weeks or months, to bring your celebirty into formal auditing session and deliver an amount ofgood auditing necessary to (1) make him much more effective, and (2) make him aware of the benefits of Scientology on the Third Dynamic.
Finance, your pay, your expeneses on this hunt are up to you. OBviusly, at whatever future date, the investment will repay itself some doczen of times,
The HASI and HDRF will do this for you:
1. Award the celebrity to you as your quarry.
2. Restrain any other audor from bothering your game.
3. Gove you, tuition free, teo weeks of special coaching of the Hubbard Professional |College in Phoenix. (You would have to pay your transpory and living costs.)
4. Assist ny maining to the celebrity, your actions.
here we have Project Celebrity. Much later, as part of the Third Dynamic action of Scientology, we will have other comm-lines to take over. Just now we have these. They are powerful ines.
Thes celebrities are wull guared, well barricaded, over-worked, aloof quarry. If you brin one of them home you will get a small plaque as your reward. 
If you want one of these celebrities as your game, write us at once so the notable will be yours to hunt without interference.

They have done that every since... they get on celebrity in... then they get one or two other ones in and they get one or two other ones is and so on,...so even they only have 20 to 20,000 people in Scientology ... 5,000 of those are giving them a few million bucks each  year .. they don't pay these 5,000 people that work there ...  ther're not makling any money ... 
Question: When you worked  there ... what were you making... what were you making for 15 years... ?
Answer: I was getting... if you paid... it was about $50 bucks... er week... but taxes were taken out .... $46. bucks 24 cents a week ...
 Question: How much?
Answer:  $46. bucks 24 and 24 cents a week ...
what ever the SDA took out for tax..... but here's the the thing .. |i was working 120 hours per week..... e very week ... the schedule was aboiut 110 hours per week ... but we worked... sometimes we pulled all nighters.... sometimes we pulled multiple all nighters ...but it aaveraged out about 110 to 120 hours per week tha we worked ... 52 weks a year..
Question: When were you sleeping ... were you sleeping at the place..
Answer: Now they live in quarters right next door to where the work ..but at the time I worked there ... I lived just down the street from the compound...I was restricted to the property .. I was not allowed to leave the propert and for about a year I slept on my desk or in a closet ..
Question: So you didn't live at the compound?
Answer: I didn't live at the compound.... 

when I lieft there I got my social security statement... it showed \i made a totsl of $29,000 dollars for 15 years of workimg 120 hours a week 52 week per year,,

Nourmahal

Tanja Castle (David Miscavige's secretary) leaves Gold Base
SoUpstat Published on Jul 10, 2012

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdHEh6toiWI
David Miscavige's secretary Source: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/video?id=... Please support ABC's great journalism and visit the link above. http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/html5/vid... Dear ABC, please put this on YouTube under your official account When Ron Hubbard was a teenager he was recruited by British intelligence. Thereafter he executed one intelligence assignment after the other for his entire life. They groomed Hubbard to be the front man for their subjects of Dianetics and Scientology. You can read about that in Scientology Roots Chapter Seven – The First Scientologists and Their Masters. The common denominator that explains all of Hubbard’s actions in life …. Ron Hubbard told Scientologists to support the British New World Order. He advocates the worst sociopaths in the world having direct control over the life of every individual person.
http://www.awn.bz/Ron_Hubbard_GroomedByMI6.html
https://mikemcclaughry.wordpress.com/the-reading-library/scientology/scientology-roots/scientology-roots-chapter-twelve-1-hubbards-lifelong-intelligence-career/


The Tyranny & Violence of Scientology Leader David Miscavige 1 of 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BddkM-qcLvo
doyle63l5 Published on Nov 3, 2009 ABC Nightline News Broadcast - 22 October 2009 Part 1 of 2 ABCs feature on how David Miscavige abuses and Physically Assaults his staff. This includes testimony from, amongst others, former high-ranking scientologists Mike Rinder, Amy Scobee, Marty Rathbun and Bruce Hines.

Ron Hubbard on the left

Ron Hubbard on the left - Carper and Hubbard constructed a sluice. Hubbard said –
“After locating a likely spot, Carper built a test sluice from discarded boards, and we began the task of sluicing the Negro in hope of fabulous riches. The sluice itself was a simple affair—a twenty-foot box without a top, a foot deep and a foot wide…

Vincent Astor

How the Fairfax takeover will further concentrate Australia's media
Data shows that the Australian Media Industry was already one of the most concentrated in the world before the Fairfax Takeover was announced

 The takeover of Fairfax Media by Nine will significantly increase the concentration of the online news market, with the C4 value increasing by 8%. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP

https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2018/aug/03/the-fairfax-takeover-and-how-it-will-worsen-australias-media-industry-squeeze

The takeover of Fairfax Media by Nine further concentrates the Australian media, which, data shows, was already one of the more concentrated media industries in the world.
In 2016, a landmark study on media ownership and concentration, Who Owns the World Media?, was published. The study was a collaboration between academics in 30 countries, and it collated and analysed data on the ownership and concentration of media in each nation.
For each country, the researchers calculated a number of different measures of market concentration across 13 “media” industries.

They looked at which companies controlled how much of any given market using two key measures of concentration. The first is the C4 index, which is the sum of the market share of the top four companies, and the second is the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI), which sums the square of the market share of all companies in the market.

The research further differentiated “content media” – newspapers, magazines, books, radio, TV and film – and “platform media”, which consists of sectors like telecom and internet service providers.

The results show that, in 2011, Australia’s content media industry was among the most concentrated in the world, and had been getting steadily more concentrated over time.


Media ownership concentration for selected countries, 2011 or most recent

Showing the HHI concentration index for a country's content media industry against the trend in the HHI index. The HHI index is a measure of media concentration derived from the market shares of companies, and ranges between 0 and 10,000 (where one company holds 100% of the market). The value shown here is the average HHI across each country's content media industry (newspapers, magazines, books, radio, broadcast TV and film). A market is considered highly concentrated if it has a HHI value above 2,500
The authors described this combination of high concentration with an upward trend as “problematic”, highlighting Australia alongside Switzerland, the Netherlands, Italy, Turkey, France and Russia.

Australia had the 10th most concentrated content media industry by this measure. For news media, it ranked as the 11th most concentrated. It is also worth pointing out that the media of several of the countries that ranked more highly are largely state-owned, such as in China and Egypt.
The research also looked at another way of measuring media diversity by counting the number of “voices” in a media market. So, two radio stations, three newspapers and a television channel would all each count as unique “voices”, and a large number of different voices would indicate a diverse market with a range of choices and views, particularly once adjusted for ownership.

Counting the proportion of these voices that are part of multivoice companies gives a measure of media cross-ownership for each country:

Cross-ownership of media in selected countries, 2011 or most recent

https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2018/aug/03/the-fairfax-takeover-and-how-it-will-worsen-australias-media-industry-squeeze
This measurement of media cross-ownership looks at media voices (eg. newspapers, radio stations) owned by a multi-voice firm as a percentage of the overall number of voices in a market. Higher values mean higher cross-ownership
Australia ranks toward the higher end, a result of “a combination of the strong position of the private companies and of the public broadcasters in a tight oligopoly”, according to the authors.
Australia also had the most concentrated newspaper industry out of any country studied, again with the exception of China and Egypt:
Newspaper ownership concentration by country, 2011 or most recent
The HHI index measures market concentration, ranging from 0 (least concentrated) to 10,000 (market dominated by single owner).

This concentration is largely due to Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, which, at the time, controlled 57% of the newspaper market by circulation.
Since this research was carried out, the market has become even more concentrated – APN News & Media was bought by News Corp in December 2016. Based on the 2011 figures, News Corp would have then controlled more than 60% of the market by circulation.
Unfortunately it is difficult to update these figures as News Corp has withdrawn all its print titles from circulation auditing in favour of a new metric that measures readership across all platforms.
However, it is possible to look at the impact of the Fairfax takeover on the online news market.
Using the January 2018 “unique audience” figures from Nielsen as a measure of market share, we can calculate the C4 and HHI for news and current affairs websites with a significant Australian presence:
Estimated online news market concentration change following Fairfax takeover by Nine
Showing the online news 'market share' of the four largest media companies, based on Nielsen unique audience figures for January 2018
This analysis shows the Fairfax takeover will significantly increase the concentration of the online news market, with the C4 value going from 68% to 73.4% – an 8% increase, and an indication of a fairly concentrated market. The HHI would increase from 1,619 to 1,961 post-takeover.
Note: I’ve used Nielsen’s January unique audience figures to calculate the C4 and HHI, changing the ownership of Fairfax properties from Fairfax Media to Nine Entertainment to approximate the post-takeover concentration figure. I’m counting any site that has an Australian-specific homepage or edition, and a substantial editorial staff presence in Australia. You can check the working here, please let me know if you spot any errors.

• Support our independent journalism with a monthly or one-off contribution.

Colonel Edward Mandell House Edward House helped Wilson get electedas US President and was Wilson’s closest adviser

scientology-moscow

Ron Hubbard on his way to Alaska

The ROOM

The ROOM was an outcropping of the previously formed Naval Reserves. The ROOM was the forerunner of the Office of Strategic Services – which was the forerunner of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Joseph Cheesman Thompson

Joseph Cheesman Thompson of the US Navy and Consuelo Andrew Seoane of the US Army, served together as spies in Japan starting in 1909. They pretended they were studying coastal reptiles and amphibians, but they were actually charting possible invasion routes and counting all the Japanese fortifications and naval guns that were part of Japan’s coastal defenses. Their espionage work went on from there into places other than Japan. In a subsequent assignment, Thompson was sent into China because of the Boxer rebellion there.

Mr. Biden was given some of the highest-profile assignments of Mr. Obama’s presidency. CreditStephen Crowley/The New York Times

L. Ron Hubbard with John W. Campbell

Ron Hubbard in 1936. 

A declassified document describing MK-ULTRA

Sigmund Freud was an Austrian neurologist and the founder of psychoanalysis, a clinical method for treating psychopathology through dialogue between a patient and a psychoanalyst. Freud was born to Galician Jewish parents in the Moravian town of Freiberg, in the Austrian Empire

L. Ron Hubbard in 1932

US Intelligence Community -Here is the emblem of the United States Intelligence Community:

Ron Miscavige fears for his daughter-in-law

Arthur James Balfour, KG, OM, PC, FRS, FBA, DL, from 1922 1st Earl of Balfour, was a British statesman and Conservative Party politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1902 to 1905.

Joseph Thompson, 1923 – Commander Joseph “Snake” Thompson had recently been to Vienna and was a personal student of Sigmund Freud on the subject of the mind and psychoanalysis.

William Wiseman

Wikipedia Exposed Media - WEM www.wikipediaexposed.org

FREEDOM TO PROVIDE FACTS, INFORMATION, OPINION AND DEBATE WIKIPEDIA EXPOSED MEDIA - TRUTHFUL NEWS MEDIA, ENCOURAGE OPEN DEBATE

The Gold Base Compound, the international headquarters of Scientology.